Movatterモバイル変換

[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
• Next message:[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By "fundamentally", I mean for those strings that have not yet noticed that they contain no supplementary (>0xffff) characters.I've toyed with making this O(1) universally. Like Steven, I understand this to be a freedom afforded to implementers, rather than an issue of conformity.Jeff AllenOn 04/06/2014 02:17, Steven D'Aprano wrote:> There is a discussion over at MicroPython about the internal> representation of Unicode strings....> My own feeling is that O(1) string indexing operations are a quality of> implementation issue, not a deal breaker to call it a Python. I can't> see any requirement in the docs that str[n] must take O(1) time, but> perhaps I have missed something.>

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
• Next message:[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]