Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] PEP 414
Ned Batchelderned at nedbatchelder.com
Sun Feb 26 13:34:59 CET 2012
On 2/26/2012 6:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:> As soon as you allow the use of "from __future__ import> unicode_literals" or a module level "__metaclass__ = type", you can't> review diffs in isolation any more - whether the diff is correct or> not will depend on the presence or absence of module level tweak to> the language semantics.>> Future imports work well for things like absolute imports, new> keywords, or statements becoming functions - if the future import is> missing when you expected it to be present (or vice-versa) will result> in a quick SyntaxError or ImportError that will point you directly to> the offending code. Unicode literals and implicitly creating new-style> classes are a different matter - for those, if the module level> modification takes place (or doesn't take place when you expected it> to be there), you get unexpected changes in behaviour instead of a> clear exception that refers directly to the source of the problem.There are already __future__ imports that violate this principle: from __future__ import division. That doesn't mean I'm in favor of this new __future__, just keeping a wide angle on the viewfinder.--Ned.
More information about the Python-Devmailing list
[8]ページ先頭