Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] folding cElementTree behind ElementTree in 3.3
Eli Benderskyeliben at gmail.com
Fri Feb 10 15:59:48 CET 2012
<snip>> """A common pattern in Python 2.x is to have one version of a module> implemented in pure Python, with an optional accelerated version> implemented as a C extension; for example, pickle and cPickle. This> places the burden of importing the accelerated version and falling> back on the pure Python version on each user of these modules. In> Python 3.0, the accelerated versions are considered implementation> details of the pure Python versions. Users should always import the> standard version, which attempts to import the accelerated version and> falls back to the pure Python version. The pickle / cPickle pair> received this treatment. The profile module is on the list for 3.1.> The StringIO module has been turned into a class in the io module.""">> Is there a good reason why xml.etree.ElementTree /> xml.etree.cElementTree did not "receive this treatment"?><snip>Since there appeared to be an overall positive response for makingthis change in Python 3.3, and since there isn't longer any doubtabout the ownership of the package *in Python's stdlib* (seehttp://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116389.html),I've opened issue 13988 on the bug tracker to follow theimplementation.Eli
More information about the Python-Devmailing list
[8]ページ先頭