Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] partition() (was: Remove str.find in 3.0?)
Phillip J. Ebypje at telecommunity.com
Tue Aug 30 17:27:54 CEST 2005
At 04:28 PM 8/30/2005 +0200, Eric Nieuwland wrote:>I have some use cases with:> cut_at = some_str.find(sep)> head, tail = some_str[:cut_at], some_str[cut_at:]>and:> cut_at = some_str.find(sep)> head, tail = some_str[:cut_at], some_str[cut_at+offset:] # offset !=>len(sep)>>So if partition() [or whatever it'll be called] could have an optional>second argument that defines the width of the 'cut' made, I would be>helped enormously. The default for this second argument would be>len(sep), to preserve the current proposal.Unrelated comment: maybe 'cut()' and rcut() would be nice short names.I'm not seeing the offset parameter, though, because this: head,__,tail = some_str.cut(sep) tail = tail[offset:]is still better than the original example.
More information about the Python-Devmailing list
[8]ページ先頭