Movatterモバイル変換

[Python-Dev] an alternative suggestion, Re: pdb: should next command be extended?

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] an alternative suggestion, Re: pdb: should next command be extended?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Ilya Sandler wrote:> So, would implementing gdb's "until" command instead of "next N" be a> better idea? In its simplest form (without arguments) "until" advances to> the next (textually) source line... This would solve the original problem of>  getting over list comprehensions...I like that idea.> There is a bit of a problem with abbreviation of "until": gdb abbreviates> it as "u", while in pdb "u" means "up"...It might be a good idea to have the> same abbreviationsIndeed. I don't know much about pdb internals, but I think "u" shouldbecome unbound, and "up" and "unt" should become the shortestabbreviations.Regards,Martin

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] an alternative suggestion, Re: pdb: should next command be extended?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]