Movatterモバイル変換

[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> At OSCON, Anthony Baxter made the point that pdb is currently one of the> more unPythonic modules.What is unpythonic about pdb? Is this part of Anthony's presentationonline? (Google found a summary and slides from presentation but theydon't say anything about pdb's deficiencies)IlyaOn Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Aahz wrote:> On Sun, Aug 07, 2005, Ilya Sandler wrote:> >> > Solution:> >> > Should pdb's next command accept an optional numeric argument? It would> > specify how many actual lines of code (not "line events")> > should  be skipped in the current frame before stopping,>> At OSCON, Anthony Baxter made the point that pdb is currently one of the> more unPythonic modules.  If you're feeling a lot of energy about this,> rewriting pdb might be more productive.> --> Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>http://www.pythoncraft.com/>> The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and> loosely-couple the hell out of everything.>

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] pdb: should next command be extended?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]