Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
Thomas Woutersthomas@xs4all.net
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:46:10 +0200
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:51:49PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:> What's so hard about rat(2,3) ?I have to agree with MAL. I know, rationally, why a rational literal (or isit literal rational ?) is desirable, but it feels like clutter and all ofthe proposed syntactic solutions strike me as bad ideas. I'd much ratherhave the above (which deals with everyone else's favorite data type andtheir requests to have builtin support for it at the same time) than anot-quite-perfect way to spell a rational literally.-- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
[8]ページ先頭