Movatterモバイル変換

[Python-Dev] I think my set module is ready for prime time; comments?

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] I think my set module is ready for prime time; comments?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] I think my set module is ready for prime time; comments?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Guido van Rossum wrote:>>...>> > Cool idea, but even cooler (would catch more idioms, that is) is> > "the first time someone stores something not 'is'  something in the>> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by the ^^^ marked phrase.> Can you please elaborate?I wasn't clear about that either. The idea is:def add(new_value):    if not values_array:        if self.magic_value is NULL:            self.magic_value = new_value        elif new_value is not self.magic_value:            self.values_array=[self.magic_value, new_value, ... ]        else:            # new_value is self.magic_value: do nothingI am neutral on this proposal myself. I think that even if we optimizeany code where you pass the same thing over and over again, we shoulddocument a convention for consistency. So I'm not sure there is muchadvantage. Paul Prescod

• Previous message:[Python-Dev] I think my set module is ready for prime time; comments?
• Next message:[Python-Dev] I think my set module is ready for prime time; comments?
• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]