Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview
List overview
Download

Wikitech-lSeptember 2023

wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  • 38 participants
  • 40 discussions
Start a nNew thread
Database dumps
by Byrial Jensen 17 Apr '25

17 Apr '25
Until some weeks agohttp://dumps.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html usedto show 4 dumps in progress at the same time. That meant that newdatabase dumps normally was available within about 3 weeks for alldatabases except for enwiki and maybe dewiki where the dump process dueto size took longer time.However the 4 dumps processes at one time become 3 some weeks ago. Andafter massive failures at June 4, only one dump has been in progress atthe same time. So at the current speed it will take several months tocome thru all dumps.Is it possible to speed up the process again using several dumpprocesses at the same time?Thank you,Byrial
3 2
0 0
User-Agent:
by Domas Mituzas 17 Apr '25

17 Apr '25
Hi!from now on specific per-bot/per-software/per-client User-Agent header is mandatory for contacting Wikimedia sites.Domas
19 61
0 0

17 Apr '25
Hoi,This is an inquiry from my friend in academia, researching about Wikipedia.He would like to know whether there's a way to acquire a list of templatesincluding external links. Here are some examples including external links.https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:JOI/dochttps://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Twitter/docSuch links are stored in externallinks.sql.gz, in an expanded form.When you want to check increase/decrease of linked domains in chronologicalorder through edit history, you have to check pages-meta-history1.xml etc.In a such case, traditional links and links by templates are mixed,Therefore, the latter ones (links by templates) should be expanded totraditional link forms.Sorry if what I am saying does not make sense.Thanks in advance,--Takashi Ota [[U:Takot]]
13 24
0 0
EBNF grammar project status?
by Steve Bennett 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25
What's the status of the project to create a grammar for Wikitext in EBNF?There are two pages:http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitext_Metasyntaxhttp://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Markup_specNothing seems to have happened since January this year. Also the comments onthe latter page seem to indicate a lack of clear goal: is this just a funproject, is it to improve the existing parser, or is it to facilititate anew parser? It's obviously a lot of work, so it needs to be of clearbenefit.Brion requested the grammar IIRC (and there's a comment to that effect athttp://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7), so I'm wondering what became of it.Is there still a goal of replacing the parser? Or is there some alternativeplan?Steve
26 217
0 0
Phabricator upstream shutdown
by Brian Wolff 21 Mar '25

21 Mar '25
It sounds like phabricator upstream is going away:https://admin.phacility.com/phame/post/view/11/phacility_is_winding_down_op…Just curious, are we planning to continue using it long term or move tosomething else?--Brian
10 12
0 0
Missing Section Headings
by Marc Riddell 13 Sep '24

13 Sep '24
Hello,I have been a WP editor since 2006. I hope you can help me. For some reasonI no longer have Section Heading titles showing in the Articles. This istrue of all Headings including the one that carries the Article subject'sname. When there is a Table of Contents, it appears fine and, when I clickon a particular Section, it goes to that Section, but all that is there is astraight line separating the Sections. There is also no button to edit aSection. If I edit the page and remove the "== ==" markers from the SectionTitles, the Title then shows up, but not as a Section Heading. Also, I don'thave any Date separators on my Want List. This started 2 days ago. Anythoughts?Thanks,Marc Riddell[[User:Michael David]]
10 11
0 0
I know it has been annoying a couple of people other than me, so now that I've learned how to make it work I'll share the knowledge here.tl;dr: Star the repositories. No, seriously. (And yes, you need to star each extension repo separately.)(Is there a place onmw.org to put this tidbit on?)------- Forwarded message -------From: "Brian Levine" <support(a)github.com> (GitHub Staff)To: matma.rex(a)gmail.comCc:Subject: Re: Commits in mirrored repositories not showing up on my profileDate: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:47:19 +0200Hi BartoszIn order to link your commits to your GitHub account, you need to have some association with the repository other than authoring the commit. Usually, having push access gives you that connection. In this case, you don't have push permission, so we don't link you to the commit.The easy solution here is for you to star the repository. If you star it - along with the other repositories that are giving you this problem - we'll see that you're connected to the repository and you'll get contribution credit for those commits.CheersBrian-- Matma Rex
3 3
0 0
Research FAQ gets a facelift
by Dario Taraborelli 25 Jun '24

25 Jun '24
We just released a new version of Research:FAQ on Meta [1], significantlyexpanded and updated, to make our processes at WMF more transparent and tomeet an explicit FDC request to clarify the role and responsibilities ofindividual teams involved in research across the organization.The previous version – written from the perspective of the (now inactive)Research:Committee, and mostly obsolete since the release of WMF's openaccess policy [2] – can still be found here [3].Comments and bold edits to the new version of the document are welcome. Forany question or concern, you can drop me a line or ping my username on-wiki.Thanks,Dario[1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:FAQ[2]https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Open_access_policy[3]https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:FAQ&oldid=15176953*Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundationwikimediafoundation.org •nitens.org • @readermeter<http://twitter.com/readermeter>
2 1
0 0

23 Apr '24
Hello all,The Technical Decision-Making Forum Retrospective team<https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making> invites you tocomplete a survey about Wikimedia's technical decision-making processes.While there will be more ways to participate, this is the first and mostimportant step in our data collection. It aims to gather information aboutyour experience, thoughts, and needs regarding the process of makingtechnical decisions across the Wikimedia technical spaces.This survey will be used for gathering information about the process andthe needs around technical decision-making that touches our productionsystems.You can find the survey link here:https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/885471?lang=enWho should take this survey?People who do technical work that relies on software maintained by theWikimedia Foundation (WMF) or affiliates. If you contribute code toMediaWiki or extensions used by Wikimedia, or you maintain gadgets or toolsthat rely on WMF infrastructure, this survey is for you.What is the deadline?*August 7th, 2023 *What will the Retrospective team do with the information?The retrospective team will synthesize the collected data and publish ananonymized analysis that will help leadership make decisions about thefuture of the process.We will collect anonymized information that we will analyze in two mainways: - Sentiments based on demographic information: these will tell us whether there are different needs and desires from different groups of people. - General needs and perceptions about decision-making in our technical spaces: This will help us understand what kind of decisions happen in the spaces, who is involved, and how to adjust our processes accordingly.Is the survey the only way to participate?The survey is the most important way for us to gather information becauseit helps us gather input in a structured manner. But it will not be theonly way you can share your thoughts with us - we will have moreinformation soon about upcoming listening sessions where you can talk withus live. In the meantime, you are always welcome to leave feedback on thetalk page:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Technical_decision_making/Technical_Dec…Where can I see more information?There are several places where you can find more information about theTechnical Decision-Making Process Retrospective: - The original announcement about the retrospective from Tajh Taylor:https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org/… - The Technical Decision-Making Process general information page:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making - The Technical Decision-Making Process Retrospective on MediaWiki:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making/Technical_Decision… - Phabricator ticket:https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T333235How to contact the retrospective core team: - Write to the core team mailing list: tdf-retro-2023(a)lists.wikimedia.org - The Technical Decision-Making Process Retrospective on MediaWiki talk page:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Technical_decision_making/Technical_Dec…Thank you,Moriel, on behalf of the TDMP Retro Core GroupCore group: - Moriel Schottlender (chair) - Daniel Kinzler - Chris Danis - Kosta Harlan - Temilola Adeleye-- Moriel Schottlender (she/her <https://pronoun.is/she>)Principal Software EngineerWikimedia Foundationhttps://wikimediafoundation.org/
3 6
3 0
SemanticCite
by Sorin Gheorghiu 30 Oct '23

30 Oct '23
Hello folks!does anybody know if this extension is still maintained? The latest commit is from May 16, 2020.There are older tickets about SCI being not compatible with SWM 4.0.0 (and therefore not compatible with MW1.39 which will become EOL end of 2023).Sorin
4 3
0 0
Results per page:
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp