This paper (first reference) is the result of a class project I was part ofalmost two years ago for CSCI 5417 Information Retrieval Systems. It buildson a class project I did in CSCI 5832 Natural Language Processing and whichI presented at Wikimania '07. The project was very late as we didn't sendthe final paper in until the day before new years. This technical report wasnever really announced that I recall so I thought it would be interesting tolook briefly at the results. The goal of this paper was to break articlesdown into surface features and latent features and then use those to studythe rating system being used, predict article quality and rank results in asearch engine. We used the [[random forests]] classifier which allowed us toanalyze the contribution of each feature to performance by looking directlyat the weights that were assigned. While the surface analysis was performedon the whole english wikipedia, the latent analysis was performed on thesimple english wikipedia (it is more expensive to compute). = Surfacefeatures = * Readability measures are the single best predictor of qualitythat I have found, as defined by the Wikipedia Editorial Team (WET). The[[Automated Readability Index]], [[Gunning Fog Index]] and [[Flesch-KincaidGrade Level]] were the strongest predictors, followed by length of articlehtml, number of paragraphs, [[Flesh Reading Ease]], [[Smog Grading]], numberof internal links, [[Laesbarhedsindex Readability Formula]], number of wordsand number of references. Weakly predictive were number of to be's, numberof sentences, [[Coleman-Liau Index]], number of templates, PageRank, numberof external links, number of relative links. Not predictive (overall - seethe end of section 2 for the per-rating score breakdown): Number of h2 orh3's, number of conjunctions, number of images*, average word length, numberof h4's, number of prepositions, number of pronouns, number of interlanguagelinks, average syllables per word, number of nominalizations, article age(based on page id), proportion of questions, average sentence length. :*Number of images was actually by far the single strongest predictor of anyclass, but only for Featured articles. Because it was so good at picking outfeatured articles and somewhat good at picking out A and G articles theclassifier was confused in so many cases that the overall contribution ofthis feature to classification performance is zero. :* Number of externallinks is strongly predictive of Featured articles. :* The B class is highlydistinctive. It has a strong "signature," with high predictive valueassigned to many features. The Featured class is also very distinctive. F, Band S (Stop/Stub) contain the most information. :* A is the least distinct class, not being very different from F or G. =Latent features = The algorithm used for latent analysis, which is ananalysis of the occurence of words in every document with respect to thelink structure of the encyclopedia ("concepts"), is [[Latent DirichletAllocation]]. This part of the analysis was done by CS PhD student PrafulMangalath. An example of what can be done with the result of this analysisis that you provide a word (a search query) such as "hippie". You can thenlook at the weight of every article for the word hippie. You can pick thearticle with the largest weight, and then look at its link network. You canpick out the articles that this article links to and/or which link to thisarticle that are also weighted strongly for the word hippie, while alsocontributing maximally to this articles "hippieness". We tried this query inour system (LDA), Google (site:en.wikipedia.org hippie), and the SimpleEnglish Wikipedia's Lucene search engine. The breakdown of articles occuringin the top ten search results for this word for those engines is: * LDAonly: [[Acid rock]], [[Aldeburgh Festival]], [[Anne Murray]], [[CarlRadle]], [[Harry Nilsson]], [[Jack Kerouac]], [[Phil Spector]], [[PlasticOno Band]], [[Rock and Roll]], [[Salvador Allende]], [[Smothers brothers]],[[Stanley Kubrick]]. * Google only: [[Glam Rock]], [[South Park]]. * Simpleonly: [[African Americans]], [[Charles Manson]], [[Counterculture]], [[Druguse]], [[Flower Power]], [[Nuclear weapons]], [[Phish]], [[Sexualliberation]], [[Summer of Love]] * LDA & Google & Simple: [[Hippie]],[[Human Be-in]], [[Students for a democratic society]], [[Woodstockfestival]] * LDA & Google: [[Psychedelic Pop]] * Google & Simple: [[Lysergicacid diethylamide]], [[Summer of Love]] ( See the paper for the articlesproduced for the keywords philosophy and economics ) = Discussion /Conclusion = * The results of the latent analysis are totally up to yourperception. But what is interesting is that the LDA features predict the WETratings of quality just as well as the surface level features. Both featuresets (surface and latent) both pull out all almost of the information thatthe rating system bears. * The rating system devised by the WET is notdistinctive. You can best tell the difference between, grouped together,Featured, A and Good articles vs B articles. Featured, A and Good articlesare also quite distinctive (Figure 1). Note that in this study we didn'tlook at Start's and Stubs, but in earlier paper we did. :* This isinteresting when compared to this recent entry on the YouTube blog. "FiveStars Dominate Ratings"http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/09/five-stars-dominate-ratings.html…I think a sane, well researched (with actual subjects) rating systemiswell within the purview of the Usability Initiative. Helping people find andcreate good content is what Wikipedia is all about. Having a solid ratingsystem allows you to reorganized the user interface, the Wikipedianamespace, and the main namespace around good content and bad content asneeded. If you don't have a solid, information bearing rating system youdon't know what good content really is (really bad content is easy to spot).:* My Wikimania talk was all about gathering data from people about articlesand using that to train machines to automatically pick out good content. Youask people questions along dimensions that make sense to people, and givethe machine access to other surface features (such as a statistical measureof readability, or length) and latent features (such as can be derived fromdocument word occurence and encyclopedia link structure). I referenced page262 of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance to give an example of thekind of qualitative features I would ask people. It really depends on whatfeatures end up bearing information, to be tested in "the lab". Each word isan example dimension of quality: We have "*unity, vividness, authority,economy, sensitivity, clarity, emphasis, flow, suspense, brilliance,precision, proportion, depth and so on.*" You then use surface and latentfeatures to predict these values for all articles. You can also say, when aperson rates this article as high on the x scale, they also mean that it hashas this much of these surface and these latent features.= References = - DeHoust, C., Mangalath, P., Mingus., B. (2008). *Improving search in Wikipedia through quality and concept discovery*. Technical Report.PDF<http://grey.colorado.edu/mediawiki/sites/mingus/images/6/68/DeHoustMangalat…> - Rassbach, L., Mingus., B, Blackford, T. (2007). *Exploring the feasibility of automatically rating online article quality*. Technical Report. PDF<http://grey.colorado.edu/mediawiki/sites/mingus/images/d/d3/RassbachPincock…>
Hoi,I have asked and received permission to forward to you all this mostexcellent bit of news.The linguist list, is a most excellent resource for people interested in thefield of linguistics. As I mentioned some time ago they have had a fundingdrive and in that funding drive they asked for a certain amount of money ina given amount of days and they would then have a project on Wikipedia tolearn what needs doing to get better coverage for the field of linguistics.What you will read in this mail that the total community of linguists areasked to cooperate. I am really thrilled as it will also get us morelinguists interested in what we do. My hope is that a fraction will beinterested in the languages that they care for and help it become morerelevant. As a member of the "language prevention committee", I love to getmore knowledgeable people involved in our smaller projects. If it means thatwe get more requests for more projects we will really feel embarrassed withall the new projects we will have to approve because of the quality of theIncubator content and the quality of the linguistic arguments why we shouldapprove yet another language :)NB Is this not a really clever way of raising money; give us this much inthis time frame and we will then do this as a bonus...Thanks, GerardM---------- Forwarded message ----------From: LINGUIST Network <linguist(a)linguistlist.org>Date: Jun 18, 2007 6:53 PMSubject: 18.1831, All: Call for Participation: Wikipedia VolunteersTo: LINGUIST(a)listserv.linguistlist.orgLINGUIST List: Vol-18-1831. Mon Jun 18 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.Subject: 18.1831, All: Call for Participation: Wikipedia VolunteersModerators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar(a)linguistlist.org> Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry(a)linguistlist.org>Reviews: Laura Welcher, Rosetta Project <reviews(a)linguistlist.org>Homepage:http://linguistlist.org/The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,and donations from subscribers and publishers.Editor for this issue: Ann Sawyer <sawyer(a)linguistlist.org>================================================================To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form athttp://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html===========================Directory==============================1)Date: 18-Jun-2007From: Hannah Morales < hannah(a)linguistlist.org >Subject: Wikipedia Volunteers-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:49:35From: Hannah Morales < hannah(a)linguistlist.org >Subject: Wikipedia VolunteersDear subscribers,As you may recall, one of our Fund Drive 2007 campaigns was called the"Wikipedia Update Vote." We asked our viewers to consider earmarking theirdonations to organize an update project on linguistics entries in theEnglish-language Wikipedia. You can find more background information on thisat:http://linguistlist.org/donation/fund-drive2007/wikipedia/index.cfm.The speed with which we met our goal, thanks to the interest and generosityofour readers, was a sure sign that the linguistics community was enthusiasticabout the idea. Now that summer is upon us, and some of you may have a bitmoreleisure time, we are hoping that you will be able to help us get started ontheWikipedia project. The LINGUIST List's role in this project is a purelyorganizational one. We will:*Help, with your input, to identify major gaps in the Wikipedia materials orpages that need improvement;*Compile a list of linguistics pages that Wikipedia editors have identifiedas"in need of attention from an expert on the subject" or " does not cite anyreferences or sources," etc;*Send out periodical calls for volunteer contributors on specific topics orarticles;*Provide simple instructions on how to upload your entries into Wikipedia;*Keep track of our project Wikipedians;*Keep track of revisions and new entries;*Work with Wikimedia Foundation to publicize the linguistics community'sefforts.We hope you are as enthusiastic about this effort as we are. Just to help usallget started looking at Wikipedia more critically, and to easily identify anareaneeding improvement, we suggest that you take a look at the List ofLinguistspage at:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_linguists. MMany people are not listed there; others need to have more facts andinformationadded. If you would like to participate in this exciting update effort,pleaserespond by sending an email to LINGUIST Editor Hannah Morales athannah(a)linguistlist.org, suggesting what your role might be or whichlinguisticsentries you feel should be updated or added. Some linguists who saw ourcampaignon the Internet have already written us with specific suggestions, which wewillshare with you soon.This update project will take major time and effort on all our parts. Theendresult will be a much richer internet resource of information on the breadthanddepth of the field of linguistics. Our efforts should also stimulateprospectivestudents to consider studying linguistics and to educate a wider public onwhatwe do. Please consider participating.Sincerely,Hannah MoralesEditor, Wikipedia Update ProjectLinguistic Field(s): Not Applicable-----------------------------------------------------------LINGUIST List: Vol-18-1831
According to the recent Independent Auditors' Report of the WMF [1], atsome point prior to the end of June 2020, an entity called the "WikimediaKnowledge Equity Fund" was established, and $8.723 million was transferredto it by the WMF, in the form of an unconditional grant. The Fund is"managed and controlled by Tides Advocacy" (a 501(c)(4) advocacy nonprofitpreviously led by the WMF's current General Counsel/Board Secretary, whoserved as CEO, Board Secretary, and Treasurer there). Given that a Googlesearch for "Wikimedia Knowledge Equity Fund" yields zero results prior tothe release of the report, it is clear that the WMF kept this significantmove completely secret for over five months, perhaps over a year. TheReport FAQ additionally emphasizes that the WMF "has no right of return tothe grant funds provided, with the exception of unexpended funds."The WMF unilaterally and secretly transferred nearly $9 million of movementfunds to an outside organization not recognized by the AffiliationsCommittee. No mention of the grant was made in any Board resolutions orminutes from the relevant time period. The amount was not mentioned in thepublic annual plan, which set out rather less than this amount for theentire grantmaking budget for the year. No application was made through anyof the various Wikimedia grants processes. No further information has beenprovided on the administration of this new Fund, or on the text of thegrant agreement.I am appalled.-- Yair Rand[1]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/foundation/f/f7/Wikimedia_Foundation…
Hi all,Earlier this year when we decided to cancel Wikimania 2020, many of us werehopeful that we would be able to postpone it a year to 2021. I was lookingforward to connecting with all of you in Bangkok in August for our firstever Wikimania in Southeast Asia.However, as we look forward, in spite of promising developments in vaccineresearch it seems unlikely that we will all be able to travel freely andconvene together by August 2021. Over the past several months, theWikimedia Foundation Events team has been meeting with the WikimaniaSteering Committee[1] and the ESEAP Core Organizing Team (East, South EastAsia and Pacific regions)[2] to discuss how we can move forward withWikimania in 2021. Together, these stakeholders have decided that nextyear’s Wikimania will be a virtual event. Instead of being hosted by theESEAP Core Organizing Team, this virtual Wikimania will be hosted by awider group of community members. Since there still is a strong wish tohost Wikimania in the future from the ESEAP team, they will remain thehosts for the next in-person edition of Wikimania.For many of us, hearing that we won’t be gathering in person at Wikimaniain 2021 is disappointing news. But I am encouraged by the success andcreativity of all of the recent virtual movement events, from regionalevents like itWikiCon to the Wiki 20 event in Asia Pacific event tocelebrate Wikipedia’s 20th birthday and the Movement Strategy GlobalConversations held in December. I have gotten to hear from more of you overthe past months than I could have imagined at the beginning of thispandemic. As always, Wikimedians have adapted and found new ways to connectwith each other.We believe that this new virtual format will create opportunities for morepeople within our movement to be involved in putting together a movementevent than ever before. We will further build on the collaborative, openprocess for creating a Wikimania program that we started during Wikimaniain Sweden last year. Since this is our first virtual Wikimania, we willalso be able to learn from this experience and hopefully include optionsfor virtual participation in future in-person Wikimanias as well. Wikimania2021 may not happen as any of us initially imagined, but it will still bean opportunity for celebration, especially as Wikimania 2021 will happenduring Wikipedia’s 20th birthday year.We welcome ideas for this virtual Wikimania and in January, we plan toshare more information about how you can get involved in the planningprocess. We will also be able to share more information in the comingmonths about what this means in terms of invitations, submitting sessionsand scholarships. In the meantime, please share your thoughts, ideas andsuggestions with the Wikimania Steering Committee on Meta[3].As a movement, we value those opportunities to connect together in person,and look forward to when we can all gather in person again. Until then,stay safe and take care!Janeen Uzzell, on behalf of the - ESEAP Core Organizing Team - Wikimania Steering Committee - Wikimedia Foundation Events Team[1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_Committee[2]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ESEAP_Hub[3]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimania_2021-- ------------------------------*Jáneen Uzzell*Chief Operating OfficerWikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>@janeenuzzell
Hello everyone,TLDR; Wikimedia will soon be applying as a mentoring organization to Google Summer of Code 2021 <https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com> [1] and Outreachy Round 22 <https://www.outreachy.org/> [2]. The application submission deadline for GSoC is February 20th, and Outreachy is March 7th. We are currently working on a list of interesting project ideas to include in the application. If you have some ideas for coding or non-coding (design, documentation, translation, outreach, research) projects, share them here:https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T270429 [3].TimelineAs a mentor, you will be engaging potential candidates in the application period for GSoC between March 10th – April 13th, and for Outreachy between March 15th – April 16th. During this time, you will help candidates make small contributions to your project and answer any project related queries. You will be working more closely with the accepted candidates during the coding period between May-August.Project ideasWe have started compiling a list of projects that you can take a look at here:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2021 [4],https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Round_22 [5]If you don’t have an idea in mind and would like to pick one from an existing list, check out these projects:https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/outreach-programs-projects/ [6]Through GSoC, you can mentor only coding but with Outreachy also non-coding projects (including design, documentation, translation, outreach, etc.).Note that GSoC has some changes this year, including: * Smaller project size ~175 hr project (previously 350 hr) * Shortened coding period ~10 weeks long (previously 3 months) * Eligibility criteria redefined; the program is now open to candidates participating in a variety of academic programs (previously accredited university programs only)Please keep these changes in mind while sharing your project ideas.Some tips for proposing projects * Follow this task description template when you propose a project in Phabricator:https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/outreach-programs-projects [7]. Add #Google- Summer-of-Code (2021) or #Outreachy (Round 22) tag to it. * Remember, the project should require an experienced developer ~15 days to complete and a newcomer ~3 months for Outreachy and ~10 weeks for GSoC. * Each project should have at least 2 mentors, and one of them should hold a technical background. * When it comes to picking a project, you could propose one that is: * Relevant for your language community or brings impact to the Wikimedia ecosystem in the future. * Welcoming and newcomer-friendly and has a moderate learning curve. * A new idea you are passionate about, there are no deadlines attached to it; you always wanted to see it happen but couldn't due to lack of resources! * About developing a standalone tool (possibly hosted on Wikimedia Toolforge), with fewer dependencies on Wikimedia's core infrastructure, and doesn't necessarily require a specific programming language, etc.To learn more about the roles and responsibilities of a mentor, visit our resources onMediaWiki.org:https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Mentors [8],https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Mentors [9].Cheers,GSoC 2021 and Outreachy Round 22 Administrators[1]https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com[2]https://www.outreachy.org/[3]https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T270429[4]https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2021[5]https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Round_22[6]https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/outreach-programs-projects/[7]https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/outreach-programs-projects/[8]https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Mentors[9]https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreachy/Mentors
Hi all,Join the Research Team at the Wikimedia Foundation [1] for their monthlyOffice hours next week on 2021-02-02 at 17:00-18:00 PM UTC (9am PT/6pmCET).To participate, join the video-call via this Wikimedia-meet link [2]. Thereis no set agenda - feel free to add your item to the list of topics in theetherpad [3] (You can do this after you join the meeting, too.), otherwiseyou are welcome to also just hang out. More detailed information (e.g.about how to attend) can be found here [4].Through these office hours, we aim to make ourselves more available toanswer some of the research related questions that you as Wikimediavolunteer editors, organizers, affiliates, staff, and researchers face inyour projects and initiatives. Some example cases we hope to be able tosupport you in: - You have a specific research related question that you suspect you should be able to answer with the publicly available data and you don’t know how to find an answer for it, or you just need some more help with it. For example, how can I compute the ratio of anonymous to registered editors in my wiki? - You run into repetitive or very manual work as part of your Wikimedia contributions and you wish to find out if there are ways to use machines to improve your workflows. These types of conversations can sometimes be harder to find an answer for during an office hour, however, discussing them can help us understand your challenges better and we may find ways to work with each other to support you in addressing it in the future. - You want to learn what the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation does and how we can potentially support you. Specifically for affiliates: if you are interested in building relationships with the academic institutions in your country, we would love to talk with you and learn more. We have a series of programs that aim to expand the network of Wikimedia researchers globally and we would love to collaborate with those of you interested more closely in this space. - You want to talk with us about one of our existing programs [5].Hope to see many of you,Martin (WMF Research Team)[1]https://research.wikimedia.org/team.html[2]https://meet.wmcloud.org/ResearchOfficeHours[3]https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Research-Analytics-Office-hours[4]https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Office_hours[5]https://research.wikimedia.org/projects.html-- Martin GerlachResearch ScientistWikimedia Foundation
Hello everyone,Following up on recent news [1] that was shared in regards to the EventsRefresh [2] ,we are continuing our efforts to improve our processes,systems, accessibility and reevaluate our strategy.We are launching our first survey* and we are looking for your ideas,inputs and suggestions!With this survey we are zooming in on 4 areas of focus: - Capacity building - Newcomer strategy for first time event participants - Participation accessibility - Events team office hoursIn this survey you will be asked to identify and prioritize capacitybuilding practices, identify needs and tools you believe are most neededfor your local community’s development. The information you'll provide willprovide a basis for new tools, training processes, services and resourceswe will build in the coming months.We would like to invite you to participate by completing our survey by *January31st, 2021* at the latest [3]. The survey has 20 questions and should nottake more than 10-12 minutes. If you wish you could also choose toparticipate in Focus Group Interviews, which are scheduled to take placeduring the first quarter of 2021. An option to self-select has beenincluded in the survey.Please feel free to send this survey through to anyone you think would beinterested.Thank you so much for your participation!On behalf of the Community Events Team,Joël L.*This survey will be conducted via a third-party service, which may subjectit to additional terms. For more information on privacy and data-handling,see the survey's privacy statement [4][1]https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2020-November/095903.html[2]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Events_Refresh[3]https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_1TdTlK50Z7l6GMJ[4]https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Survey_Privacy_S…*Jo**ël Letang* (he/him)Senior Strategist EventsWikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
Hi there!As recently announced, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees isorganizing a call for feedback about community-and-affiliated seatselection processes between February 1 and March 14. You can find all theinformation on Meta:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_Boa…We are offering multiple channels for questions and feedback. With the helpof a team of community facilitators, we are organizing multipleconversations with multiple groups in multiple languages. I am thecommunity facilitator for English language communities and Meta discussionsabout the Board Governance updates.During this call for feedback we will publish weekly reports and we willdraft the final report that will be delivered to the Board. With the helpof this report, the Board will approve the next steps to organize theselection of six community seats in the upcoming months. Three of theseseats are due for renewal and three are new, recently approved.We are looking for a broad representation of opinions. We are interested inthe reasoning and the feelings behind your opinions. In a conversation likethis one, details are important. We want to support good conversationswhere everyone can share and learn from others.*How to participate*You can choose your preferred language and way of participation. A team offacilitators is watching multiple channels and capturing the outcome ofconversations in weekly reports (see below). - Discuss in the Talk page for each idea, or in this Talk page [1] for general comments. Translated pages welcome discussions in their respective languages. - Discuss in the WM Board Governance Telegram [2] group created for this call for feedback. - Join a conversation or an online meeting near you. We are organizing multiple conversations on wiki projects, with affiliates, and other groups.If there are no conversations or meetings organized for your project oryour affiliate, contact us here, on Telegram, or via email atcommunity-board-seats-cff(a)wikimedia.org. A facilitator will contact you toorganize one.Please do not hesitate to reach out if there is anything you suggest tobetter help me connect and gather feedback from your community. Thanks fortaking the time to participate in this process.Best,Jackie--*Jackie Koerner**she/her*Communication Facilitator, Board Governance*English language communities and Meta*[1]https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees…[2]https://t.me/wmboardgovernancechat
Dear fellow Wikimedians,Today I am informing you that I will not be renewing my contract withWikimedia Deutschland, which runs until January 2022. This decision was noteasy for me because Wikimedia has been such an important, even central,part of my life in the past nine years. After thorough introspection, Ifeel that this step is the right one for me and for our organisation.This means that a successor will have to be found for the position of theExecutive Director. The search is managed by our Supervisory Board and mewith support of an external executive search firm. The search process hasbeen well prepared in recent weeks and I am working closely with our boardon each of the steps.Together, we will ensure a good handover and transition to my successor.This point is very important to me, as is the fact that we will continue towork without losing focus on achieving our goals, on working with theentire movement, and on collaborating very closely on movement strategyimplementation. That's why I don't want to say a big goodbye right now.What’s next - In cooperation with the external executive search firm Kienbaum, we have developed a search profile and a job posting that will go online shortly. - We strive to have someone on board well before the end of my term in January 2022. As we have commenced the procedure so early, we are on a very good track. - I also consider it essential to be available for a comprehensive transition and onboarding of a new Executive Director.If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.Best regards,Abraham-- Geschäftsführender Vorstand / Executive DirectorWikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 BerlinTel. (030) 219 158 26-0http://wikimedia.de