With respect, the work on the Sexual Content proposal as pretty muchthrown out all of Jimbo's work, and is proceeding from a directionmore consistent with the values of Commons. To say that " Jimmy isactively engaged in discussions with other Wikimedia editors aboutsexually-explicit materials on Wikimedia Commons." is highlymisleading: He has not been involved with this process since theattempted purge.Further:"and although the discussions over the past week have been unusuallyintense, we don’t consider them problematic. Discussion is howWikimedians work through policy development and policy interpretation:active argument and debate are normal for us — they are how we do ourwork. The Wikimedia Foundation is grateful for Jimmy’s involvement,and we’re glad he continues to be an important part of the Wikimediamovement."Actually, Jimbo was highly disruptive, editwarred to force artworks tobe included in the list of material to delete, threatened people, andno progress was or could be made until he left it to us volunteers.This is a rewrite of history.-Adam