Aur-requests
Threads by month
- ----- 2025 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
May 2024
- 26 participants
- 783 discussions
03 Mar '25
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for avogadro2-appimage [2]:By AUR consensus, Avogadro2 is called 'avogadroapp' on AUR. [a]Therefore other packages should be named in alignment with that, anddeclare provides & conflicts for 'avogadroapp'.Also, this is a binary package, so it should be called'avogadro2-bin'.[a]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avogadroapp[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/avogadro2-appimage/
1 1
20 Dec '24
yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge manjaro-gaming-meta [2]into arch-gaming-meta [3]:There should be no need for two separate packages for Arch andManjaro. Either way, this is the Arch User Repository, not the ManjaroUser Repository.[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/manjaro-gaming-meta/[3]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arch-gaming-meta/
2 1
09 Dec '24
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for marionnet-trunk [2]:Dead, unused package from 2016, missing a dependency.The similarly broken and also abandoned stable marionnet package from2016 has already been deleted by @serebit. [a][a]: PRQ#54635https://tinyurl.com/aurPRQ54635 -https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/X5I7JDGNHBMRNE6BUR6JV3H574GFNHM2[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/marionnet-trunk/
1 1
28 Oct '24
MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for mkxp-git [2]:Please kindly disown this package if no willingness to maintain.Another user already suggested enhancements in a comment made in Feb2020.Now the package is broken and needs some TLC.[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mkxp-git/
2 2
01 Sep '24
Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge wechat-beta-bwrap [2] intowechat-uos-bwrap [3]:This package is basically wechat-uos-bwrap, with no sandboxing whichmeans this proprietary app can obtain any system data or user dataThe reason why wechat-uos-bwrap doesn’t come with beta in name is thefact that the app doesn’t recognize itself as a beta[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-beta-bwrap/[3]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-uos-bwrap/
4 4
01 Sep '24
7Ji [1] filed a request to merge wechat-beta-bwrap [2] into wechat-universal-bwrap [3]:The native Linux client `Wechat (Beta)` was released as `Wechat(Universal)` on the Uniontech OS appstore officially [a], being adistinct package (`com.tencent.wechat`) from the previous `wechat-uos`package (`com.tencent.weixin`, available on AUR as `wechat-uos`[b] and`wechat-uos-bwrap`[c]). As this is official, having `beta` in the namedoes not make sense any more.To make this distinct from the previous package that's not builtnatively for Linux, I've created a new PKGBUILD `wechat-universal-bwrap`, please merge the `-beta` into `-universal`.[a]:https://bbs.chinauos.com/zh/post/17786[b]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-uos[c]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-uos-bwrap[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/7Ji/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-beta-bwrap/[3]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-bwrap/
1 1
01 Sep '24
Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge wechat-universal-bwrap [2] intowechat-uos-bwrap [3]:Duplicated package (seehttps://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/T4I2ZYPOPHTIKYJTUSB7CMHSNA6BHIZ7/for more details)[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-bwrap/[3]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-uos-bwrap/
3 3
01 Jun '24
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for widevine [2]:This package is broken and not compatible with Arch Linux x86_64.It is also unneeded for Chromium or Firefox, as both of them candownload the widewine module on-demand, if the user enables supportfor DRM-protected content.There is an AUR/chromium-widevine [a] that is compatible with ArchLinux and can be used with other packages that need widewine, like thesilo-{netflix,primevideo} standalone apps or the qtwebflix-git plugin.Therefore keeping AUR/widewine is both pointless and superfluous.[a]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-widevine[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/widevine/
4 12
01 Jun '24
Taijian [1] filed a deletion request for gdm-nox [2]:Starting with 46.2-1 extra/gdm has moved xorg to optdepends.Therefore, this package has become obsolete, as it's whole raisond'être was to be GDM without the xorg stuff.[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Taijian/[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gdm-nox/
1 1
31 May '24
Request #60646 has been Accepted by Xangelix [1]:[Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for python-ytdl-sub.[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Xangelix/
1 0