• Arroyo, M. T. K. (1981). Breeding Systems and Pollination Biology inLeguminosae. In: R. M. Polhill, & P. H. Raven (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• Barneby, R. C. (1996). NeotropicalFabales at NY: asides and oversights.Phyllocarpus Riedel ex Endlicher, a monotypic genus. Brittonia, 48(2): 183 – 186.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Donnell Smith, J. (1913). Undescribed plants from Guatemala and other Central American republics 36. Bot. Gaz. 55(6): 433 – 434.

  Google Scholar 

• Endlicher, S. L. (1842). Genera Plantarum. Mantissa botanica sistens generum plantarum supplementum secundum. Vienna.

• Fougère-Danezan, M., Maumont, S. & Bruneau, A. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producingDetarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. In: B. B. Klitgaard & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, higher level systematics. pp. 161–180. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• Gentry, A. H. (1993). A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of Northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru).Phyllocarpus: 512. Conservation International, Washington, DC.

• Herendeen, P. S., Bruneau, A. & Lewis, G. P. (2003a). Phylogenetic relationships in caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. In: B. B. Klitgaard & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, higher level systematics. pp. 37 – 62. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• ____, Lewis, G. P. & Bruneau, A. (2003b). Floral morphology in caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the “Umtiza clade”. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.): S393 – S407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Isely, D. (1975).Leguminosae of the United States: II. SubfamilyCaesalpinioideae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 25(2): 178.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirkbride, J. H. Jr. (1999).Barnebydendron, a new generic name (Fabaceae,Caesalpinioideae,Detarieae, Brownea group). Sida 18 (3): 815 – 818.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewis, G. P. (2005). TribeCaesalpinieae. In: G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.) Legumes of the World, pp. 127 – 161. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• Mackinder, B. (2005). TribeDetarieae. In: G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.), Legumes of the World, pp. 69 – 109. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• Schrire, B. D., Lewis, G. P. & Lavin, M. (2005). Biogeography of the Leguminosae. In G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.), Legumes of the World, pp. 21 – 54. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, L. B. (1966). The great bromeliad hoax. Bromel. Soc. Bull. 16: 4 – 5.

  Google Scholar 

• Standley, P. C. & Steyermark, J. A. (1946). Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana: Botany 24 (5):Phyllocarpus on pp. 144 – 145. Chicago Natural History Museum, Chicago.

• Tulasne, L. R. (1843). Nova Leguminosarum genera.Phyllocarpus. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 2., 20: 142 – 143.

  Google Scholar 

• Woodson R. E. Jr., Schery, R. W. & collaborators (1951). Flora of Panama, part 5, fasc. 3 (Leguminosae, second part). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 38(1):Phyllocarpus on pp. 24 – 25.

  Google Scholar 

• Wurdack, J. J. (1970). Erroneous data in Glaziou collections ofMelastomataceae. Taxon 19: 911 – 913.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references