1995Accesses
26Citations
Abstract
In this paper I discuss the advantages and challenges of using active learning, when teaching an accounting ethics course offered in higher education (see Footnotes1 and6). The willingness of an instructor to use active learning in an accounting ethics course may be influenced at least in part by that instructor’s assessment of the advantages and challenges of using active learning. Consequently, my paper may be of assistance to instructors with experience in teaching an accounting ethics course and to instructors who are preparing to teach their initial accounting ethics course.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
This paper relates to higher education. When I mention a student, students, teaching accounting ethics, an accounting ethics instructor, accounting ethics instructors, an accounting ethics course, an accounting ethics class, accounting ethics classes, accounting ethics instruction, or accounting ethics education it is in reference to an accounting ethics course in higher education. Except when specifically mentioned, ethics modules in an accounting course that is not focused on ethics is beyond the scope of the paper. However, much of the discussion in this paper has applicability to ethics modules which are part of an accounting course that is not focused on ethics.
As discussed below, each of these two approaches to teaching accounting ethics use different kinds of “teaching strategies” [see Bonwell and Sutherland (1996, p. 4); also see, e.g., Friedlan (1995, pp. 48, 61), Trigwell and Prosser (2004, p. 413), Lindblom-Ylänne et al. (2006, pp. 285–286); Ramsden et al. (2007, p. 140)].
A number of active learning strategies are mentioned in the literature (see, e.g., Adler and Milne1997, pp. 195–196; Katula and Threnhauser1999; Wingfield and Black2005, pp. 119–120; Heriot et al.2007, p. 428). Later, I discuss active learning strategies that can be used in teaching accounting ethics including “service-learning,” which is working on a project that addresses a societal need as part of a course requirement (e.g., Bringle and Hatcher1995, p. 112; also see Bringle and Hatcher1996, p. 222), and “an internship,” which is working and possibly receiving academic credit for that activity from a supervising faculty member (e.g., Parilla and Hesser1998, p. 311; Katula and Threnhauser1999, pp. 247–248). A discussion of the relationship of active learning strategies to a student’s “learning style” (see O’Leary and Stewart2013, p. 227) in the context of an accounting ethics course is beyond the scope of my paper [see O’Leary and Stewart (2013) for a discussion of this relationship in the context of ethics education in a “course” in “auditing” (p. 226)].
Bonwell and Eison (1991, pp. v, 59), e.g., use the words “obstacles” and “barriers” when considering concerns with using active learning strategies. Sutherland (1996, p. 84) uses the term “challenging barriers” when discussing colleague and student concerns with “nontraditional approaches” to education. Salemi (2002, p. 729) suggests that using active learning strategies at times can be in a positive sense a “challenge” and also “challenging.” In this paper, since accounting ethics education is a relatively young subject and in its formative period, I do not use the words “obstacles” or “barriers” (see, e.g., Bonwell and Eison1991, pp. v, 59), but instead use the words “challenges” and “challenging” when considering concerns with using active learning strategies in accounting ethics education (also see Sutherland1996, p. 92). Thus, I use the term “challenging” in the title of this paper and the term “challenges” in the abstract of this paper.
In Loeb (2007, pp. 21–22), based on personal experience and using different terminology, I suggest that accounting ethics instructors should use active learning strategies. Others (e.g., Williams and Elson2010, p. 112; Liu et al.2012, pp. 679–682), also encourage the use of active learning strategies in teaching accounting ethics.
There are papers relating to various disciplines that discuss the advantages and challenges of using of active learning strategies in higher education. For example, see Salemi’s (2002) discussion, including the advantages and challenges, of using active learning strategies in “undergraduate economics courses” (p. 721). Salemi (2002) indicates that his paper is “based on the literature” (p. 721), his teaching experiences (pp. 721, 725), and discussions with other “teachers” on “the benefits of active learning” (p. 725).
In this section, I provide examples of active learning strategies that can be used in an accounting ethics course. My discussion is not exhaustive or in detail. Additional information on using active learning strategies in accounting ethics education can be found, e.g., in Loeb (1990, pp. 287–289;1998, pp. 242–244;2007, pp. 17–18) and Massey and Van Hise (2009, pp. 490–492).
Also, see Loeb and Bedingfield (1972, p. 813). The use of a guest speaker is an active learning strategy when the guest speaker encourages class discussion. When I mention guest speakers in this paper, I assume the guest speaker encourages class discussion.
For example, both Mintz (2006) and Massey and Van Hise (2009) discuss an accounting ethics course in which students, at times, are involved in an active learning strategy that includes reflective learning. For further discussion of the use of reflective learning in teaching accounting ethics see, e.g., Mintz (2006) and Massey and Van Hise (2009). I am indebted to a reviewer for this journal for suggesting that I consider reflective learning.
In Mayer-Sommer and Loeb (1981, pp. 128–129), we suggest that there are possible limits to the “durability” (p. 129) of school-related “socialization” (p. 128). However, in Mayer-Sommer and Loeb (1981, pp. 129–133) we suggest approaches, which involve or could involve active learning strategies, that may increase the durability of school-related socialization.
See, e.g., AICPA (2013, ET Sections 56, 201, 202, 291) for information about the prescription that a public accounting practitioner be competent.
See, e.g., AICPA (2013, ET Sections 55, 100-1, 101, 102, 191, 291, 391) for information about the prescription relating to external audit independence.
Sutherland (1996, p. 86) suggests students may “not feel comfortable with” active learning strategies. Dodd (2007, p. 6) mentions the possibility of student “discomfort” when discussing an active learning strategy. Grauerholz and Copenhaver (1994, p. 322) include in their paper a student communication which expresses “‘discomfort’” with an active learning strategy.
When an instructor uses active learning strategies and cedes some control to students, that instructor is no longer the only source for all information relating to the accounting ethics course (see, e.g., November1997, p. 293). Further, when ceding some control, the instructor at times becomes, in essence, a “facilitator” (e.g., Adler and Milne1997, p. 194; November1997, p. 290).
Others (e.g., Bonwell and Eison1991, pp. 59–61; Cook and Hazelwood2002, p. 298; Salemi2002, pp. 725, 730; Auster and Wylie2006, p. 347) mention the issue of topic coverage when using active learning strategies and provide suggestions as to how an instructor using active learning strategies can deal with that specific challenge.
Others (e.g., Bonwell and Eison1991, pp. v, 62; Cook and Hazelwood2002, p. 298) also mention the challenge of instructors having a sufficient variety of assets to allow the use of active learning strategies. However, when using active learning strategies in an accounting ethics course, I have not found the availability of assets (e.g., facilities, materials), to be a limiting factor. Also, Bonwell and Eison (1991, p. 62) suggest that a number of active learning strategies are not too costly.
For example, Ravenscroft (1998, pp. 177–179) reports students having mixed reaction to service-learning.
The approach of introducing students to active learning strategies and subsequently reinforcing the introduction discussed in this paragraph, the preceding paragraph, the earlier discussion of instructional-related risks and difficulties, and in later sections of my paper is based in part on the approaches described in Adler and Milne (1997, pp. 197–198) and Sutherland (1996, p. 86).
A further discussion of the issue of how to assign grades when using active learning strategies to teach accounting ethics is outside the scope of my paper. However, I agree with both reviewers for this journal who suggested that the issue of grading in such circumstances needs additional consideration.
Norman et al. (2004, pp. 5–13) provide suggestions as to how to approach the possibility of varied performance by different group members and summarize selected papers that consider this challenge.
Students working in a community service-learning activity benefit from a learning experience that by its nature is ethics-related (see Ravenscroft1998, pp. 170–172). McCoskey and Warren (2003, pp. 407–408, 409) and Strupeck and Whitten (2004, p. 106), e.g., suggest that students can learn about ethics issues during accounting-related service-learning experiences.
A discussion of coordinating accounting ethics education with “field-based student consulting” (Heriot et al.2007, p. 428) or “cooperative education” (Katula and Threnhauser1999, p. 244; also, see Southard,1988, p. 158) is beyond the scope of my paper. Also, an accounting ethics course that is coordinated with an internship or service-learning project should include content other than class discussions and written assignments related to the work-related activity (see Condlin1983, pp. 337–338).
References
Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC). (1990).Objectives of education for accountants. Position Statement No. 1 (September). Bainbridge Island, WA: AECC.
Adler, R. W., & Milne, M. J. (1995). Increasing learner-control and reflection: Towards learning-to-learn in an undergraduate management accounting course.Accounting Education: An International Journal,4(2), 105–119.
Adler, R. W., & Milne, M. J. (1997). Improving the quality of accounting students’ learning through action-oriented learning tasks.Accounting Education: An International Journal,6(3), 191–215.
American Accounting Association Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (AAA). (1986). Future accounting education: Preparing for the expanding profession.Issues in Accounting Education,1(1), 168–195.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2013).AICPA professional standards: As of June 1, 2013, (Vol. 3). New York: AICPA.
Ammar, S., & Wright, R. (1999). Experiential learning activities in operations management.International Transactions in Operational Research,6(2), 183–197.
Anderson, S. L. (2003). Teaching today’s students how to examine ethical issues and be more actively involved in the learning process.Journal of Academic Ethics,1(2), 189–198.
Auster, E. R., & Wylie, K. K. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach.Journal of Management Education,30(2), 333–353.
Barclay, J. (1996). Learning from experience with learning logs.The Journal of Management Development,15(6), 28–43.
Beets, S. D. (1993). Using the role-playing technique in accounting ethics education.The Accounting Educators’ Journal,5(2), 46–65.
Bonwell, C. C. (1996). Enhancing the lecture: Revitalizing a traditional format. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.),Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Number 67, Fall) (pp. 31–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991).Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University.
Bonwell, C. C., & Sutherland, T. E. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage in the classroom. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.),Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Number 67, Fall) (pp. 3–16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty.Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,2(1), 112–122.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education.The Journal of Higher Education,67(2), 221–239.
Cherney, I. D. (2008). The effects of active learning on students’ memories for course content.Active Learning in Higher Education,9(2), 152–171.
Clark, T. C. (1975). Teaching professional ethics.The San Diego Law Review,12(2), 249–260.
Condlin, R. (1983). The moral failure of clinical legal education. In D. Luban (Ed.),The good lawyer: Lawyers’ roles and lawyers’ ethics (pp. 317–349). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Cook, E. D., & Hazelwood, A. C. (2002). An active learning strategy for the classroom—“Who wants to win … some mini chips ahoy?”.Journal of Accounting Education,20(4), 297–306.
Dodd, S-J. (2007). Identifying the discomfort: An examination of ethical issues encountered by MSW students during field placement.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,27(1/2), 1–19.
Frederick, P. J. (1987). Student involvement: Active learning in large classes. In M. G. Weimer (Ed.),Teaching large classes well, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Number 32, Winter) (pp. 45–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Friedlan, J. M. (1995). The effects of different teaching approaches on students’ perceptions of the skills needed for success in accounting courses and by practicing accountants.Issues in Accounting Education,10(1), 47–63.
Glennon, F. (2004). Experiential learning and social justice action: An experiment in the scholarship of teaching and learning.Teaching Theology and Religion,7(1), 30–37.
Grauerholz, E., & Copenhaver, S. (1994). When the personal becomes problematic: The ethics of using experiential teaching methods.Teaching Sociology,22(4), 319–327.
Hakeem, S. A. (2001). Effect of experiential learning in business statistics.Journal of Education for Business,77(2), 95–98.
Heriot, K. C., Cook, R. G., Matthews, C. H., & Simpson, L. (2007). Creating active and high-impact learning.Industry & Higher Education,21(6), 427–434.
Hermanson, D. R. (1994). The effect of self-generated elaboration on students’ recall of tax and accounting material: Further evidence.Issues in Accounting Education,9(2), 301–318.
Huss, H. F., & Patterson, D. M. (1993). Ethics in accounting: Values education without indoctrination.Journal of Business Ethics,12(3), 235–243.
Jacobs, W. R. (1998). The teacher as text: Using personal experience to stimulate the sociological imagination.Teaching Sociology,26(3), 222–228.
Katula, R. A., & Threnhauser, E. (1999). Experiential education in the undergraduate curriculum.Communication Education,48(3), 238–255.
Kvam, P. H. (2000). The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statistics.The American Statistician,54(2), 136–140.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context.Studies in Higher Education,31(3), 285–298.
Liu, C., Yao, L. J., & Hu, N. (2012). Improving ethics education in accounting: Lessons from medicine and law.Issues in Accounting Education,27(3), 671–690.
Loeb, S. E. (1988). Teaching students accounting ethics: Some crucial issues.Issues in Accounting Education,3(2), 316–329.
Loeb, S. E. (1990). Whistleblowing and accounting education.Issues in Accounting Education,5(2), 281–294.
Loeb, S. E. (1993). Forum participant. In J. S. Ang (Ed.), FM forum: On financial ethics.Financial Management,22(3), (pp. 53–59 relate to S. E. Loeb).
Loeb, S. E. (1998). A separate course in accounting ethics: An example. In B. N. Schwartz & D. E. Stout (Eds.),Advances in accounting education: Teaching and curriculum innovations (Vol. 1, pp. 235–250). Stamford, CT: JAI Press Inc.
Loeb, S. E. (2007). Issues relating to teaching accounting ethics: An 18 year retrospective. In C. Jeffrey (Ed.),Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (Vol. 11, pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI.
Loeb, S. E., & Bedingfield, J. P. (1972). Teaching accounting ethics.The Accounting Review,47(4), 811–813.
Loeb, S. E., & Ostas, D. T. (2000). The team teaching of business ethics in a weekly semester long format.Teaching Business Ethics,4(3), 225–238.
Massey, D. W., & Van Hise, J. (2009). Walking the walk: Integrating lessons from multiple perspectives in the development of an accounting ethics course.Issues in Accounting Education,24(4), 481–510.
Matveev, A. V., & Milter, R. G. (2010). An implementation of active learning: Assessing the effectiveness of the team informercial assignment.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,47(2), 201–213.
Mayer-Sommer, A. P., & Loeb, S. E. (1981). Fostering more successful professional socialization among accounting students.The Accounting Review,56(1), 125–136.
McCarthy, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science.Innovative Higher Education,24(4), 279–294.
McCoskey, M., & Warren, D. L. (2003). Service-learning: An innovative approach to teaching accounting: A teaching note.Accounting Education: An International Journal,12(4), 405–413.
Meisel, J. S. (2008). The ethics of observing: Confronting the harm of experiential learning.Teaching Sociology,36(3), 196–210.
Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993).Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mintz, S. M. (2006). Accounting ethics education: Integrating reflective learning and virtue ethics.Journal of Accounting Education,24(2–3), 97–117.
Montgomery, K., Brown, S., & Deery, C. (1997). Simulations: Using experiential learning to add relevancy and meaning to introductory courses.Innovative Higher Education,21(3), 217–229.
Moon, J. A. (2004).A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Norman, C. S., Rose, A. M., & Lehmann, C. M. (2004). Cooperative learning: Resources from the business discipline.Journal of Accounting Education,22(1), 1–28.
November, P. (1997). Learning to teach experientially: A pilgrim’s progress.Studies in Higher Education,22(3), 289–299.
O’Leary, C., & Stewart, J. (2013). The interaction of learning styles and teaching methodologies in accounting ethical instruction.Journal of Business Ethics,113(2), 225–241.
Parilla, P. F., & Hesser, G. W. (1998). Internships and the sociological perspective: Applying principles of experiential learning.Teaching Sociology,26(4), 310–329.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research.Journal of Engineering Education,93(3), 223–231.
Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2007). University teachers’ experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching.Learning and Instruction,17(2), 140–155.
Ravenscroft, S. P. (1998). Teaching professional accounting ethics with service-learning. In D. V. Rama (Volume Ed.),Learning by doing: Concepts and models for service-learning in accounting (pp. 167–189). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education (Published in Cooperation with KPMG Peat Marwick Foundation).
Rosenbloom, S. R., & Fetner, T. (2001). Sharing secrets slowly: Issues of classroom self-disclosure raised by student sex workers.Teaching Sociology,29(4), 439–453.
Ryan, M. P., & Martens, G. G. (1989).Planning a college course: A guidebook for the graduate teaching assistant. Ann Arbor, MI: The National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan.
Salemi, M. K. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning.Southern Economic Journal,68(3), 721–731.
Shaffer, T. L. (1996). On teaching legal ethics in the law office.Notre Dame Law Review,71(4), 605–618.
Sims, R. R. (2002). Business ethics teaching for effective learning.Teaching Business Ethics,6(4), 393–410.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning.Review of Educational Research,50(2), 315–342.
Southard, S. (1988). Experiential learning prepares students to assume professional roles.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,31(4), 157–159.
Specht, P. H. (1985). Experiential learning-based vs. lecture-based discussion: The impact of degree of participation and student characteristics on comprehension and retention.Journal of Business Education,60(7), 283–287.
Spencer, R. W., & Van Eynde, D. F. (1986). Experiential learning in economics.The Journal of Economic Education,17(4), 289–294.
Strupeck, C. D., & Whitten, D. (2004). Accounting service-learning experiences and the IRS volunteer income tax assistance programme: A teaching note.Accounting Education: An International Journal,13(1), 101–112.
Sundem, G. L., & Williams, D. Z. (1992). Changes in accounting education: Preparing for the twenty-first century.Accounting Education: An International Journal,1(1), 55–61.
Sutherland, T. E. (1996). Emerging issues in the discussion of active learning. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.),Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Number 67, Fall) (pp. 83–95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Swartzlander, S., Pace, D., & Stamler, V. L. (February 17, 1993). The ethics of requiring students to write about their personal lives.The Chronicle of Higher Education,39(24), B1–B2.
Tomassini, L. A. (1974). The use of role play simulation in accounting education. In J. D. Edwards (Ed.); W. J. Albers, T. R. Hofstedt, K. F. Skousen, J. Sorensen, & M. F. Usry (Associate Eds.),Accounting education: Problems and prospects (Education Series Number 1) (pp. 376–382). Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory.Educational Psychology Review,16(4), 409–424.
Venter, C. M. (1995). Encouraging personal responsibility—An alternative approach to teaching legal ethics.Law and Contemporary Problems,58(3&4), 287–296.
Williams, J., & Elson, R. J. (2010). Improving ethical education in the accounting program: A conceptual course.Academy of Educational Leadership Journal,14(4), 107–116.
Wingfield, S. S., & Black, G. S. (2005). Active versus passive course designs: The impact on student outcomes.Journal of Education for Business,81(2), 119–123.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Yura Kim, Robert Felix, Kyungran Lee, Yi Cao, and Congcong Li for their assistance. I am grateful for the comments that I received from several individuals on earlier versions of this paper. I particularly would like to thank Jim Staihar, Cynthia Loeb, and two reviewers who reviewed my paper for this journal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
Stephen E. Loeb
- Stephen E. Loeb
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toStephen E. Loeb.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loeb, S.E. Active Learning: An Advantageous Yet Challenging Approach to Accounting Ethics Instruction.J Bus Ethics127, 221–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2027-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative