• Asian, S., & Nie, X. (2014). Coordination in supply chains with uncertain demand and disruption risks: Existence, analysis, and insights.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(9), 1139–1154.

• Azad, N., Saharidis, G. K., Davoudpour, H., Malekly, H., & Yektamaram, S. A. (2013). Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: An improved Benders decomposition approach.Annals of Operations Research,210(1), 125–163.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bagheri, M., Saccomanno, F., & Fu, L. (2012). Modeling hazardous materials risks for different train make-up plans.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,48(5), 907–918.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Batta, R., & Kwon, C. (2013).Handbook of OR/MS models in hazardous materials transportation. Berlin: Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Bellman, R. (1956). On a routing problem. Technical report, DTIC Document.

• Bonvicini, S., & Spadoni, G. (2008). A hazmat multi-commodity routing model satisfying risk criteria: A case study.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,21(4), 345–358.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bonvicini, S., Ganapini, S., Spadoni, G., & Cozzani, V. (2012). The description of population vulnerability in quantitative risk analysis.Risk Analysis,32(9), 1576–1594.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown, D. F., & Dunn, W. E. (2007). Application of a quantitative risk assessment method to emergency response planning.Computers and Operations Research,34(5), 1243–1265.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bubbico, R., Di Cave, S., & Mazzarotta, B. (2004). Risk analysis for road and rail transport of hazardous materials: a simplified approach.Journal of Loss prevention in the Process Industries,17(6), 477–482.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bubbico, R., Maschio, G., Mazzarotta, B., Milazzo, M. F., & Parisi, E. (2006). Risk management of road and rail transport of hazardous materials in sicily.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,19(1), 32–38.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carotenuto, P., Giordani, S., & Ricciardelli, S. (2007). Finding minimum and equitable risk routes for hazmat shipments.Computers and Operations Research,34(5), 1304–1327.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chakrabarti, U., & Parikh, J. (2013). Risk-based route evaluation against country-specific criteria of risk tolerability for hazmat transportation through Indian state highways.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,26(4), 723–736.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chakrabarti, U. K., & Parikh, J. K. (2011a). Route evaluation for hazmat transportation based on total risk-a case of indian state highways.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,24(5), 524–530.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chakrabarti, U. K., & Parikh, J. K. (2011b). Route risk evaluation on class-2 hazmat transportation.Process Safety and Environmental Protection,89(4), 248–260.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Das, A., Gupta, A., & Mazumder, T. (2012). A comprehensive risk assessment framework for offsite transportation of inflammable hazardous waste.Journal of Hazardous Materials,227, 88–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fabiano, B., Curr‘o, F., Reverberi, A., & Pastorino, R. (2005). Dangerous good transportation by road: From risk analysis to emergency planning.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,18(4), 403–413.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gantt, P. (2009).Hazardous materials: Regulations, response and site operations. New York: Delmar Cengage Learning.

  Google Scholar 

• Georgiadou, P. S., Papazoglou, I. A., Kiranoudis, C. T., & Markatos, N. C. (2010). Multi-objective evolutionary emergency response optimization for major accidents.Journal of Hazardous Materials,178(1), 792–803.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glickman, T. S., & Erkut, E. (2007). Assessment of hazardous material risks for rail yard safety.Safety Science,45(7), 813–822.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glickman, T. S., Erkut, E., & Zschocke, M. S. (2007). The cost and risk impacts of rerouting railroad shipments of hazardous materials.Accident Analysis and Prevention,39(5), 1015–1025.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goh, J. W., Lim, K. G., Sim, M., & Zhang, W. (2012). Portfolio value-at-risk optimization for asymmetrically distributed asset returns.European Journal of Operational Research,221(2), 397–406.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Iosjpe, M., Reistad, O., & Amundsen, I. (2009). Radioecological consequences of a potential accident during transport of spent nuclear fuel along an arctic coastline.Journal of Environmental Radioactivity,100(2), 184–191.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. B. (1977). Efficient algorithms for shortest paths in sparse networks.Journal of the ACM (JACM),24(1), 1–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kang, Y., Batta, R., & Kwon, C. (2014a). Value-at-risk model for hazardous material transportation.Annals of Operations Research, 222(1), 361–387.

• Kang, Y., Batta, R., & Kwon, C. (2014b). Generalized route planning model for hazardous material transportation with var and equity considerations.Computers and Operations Research,43, 237–247.

• Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints.Journal of Risk,4, 43–68.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ma, C., Li, Y., He, R., Duan, G., Sun, L., & Qi, B. (2012). New optimisation model and fuzzy adaptive weighted genetic algorithm for hazardous material transportation.International Journal of Computing Science and Mathematics,3(4), 341–352.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palmquist, J., Uryasev, S., & Krokhmal, P. (1999). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida.

• Quaranta, A. G., & Zaffaroni, A. (2008). Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection.Journal of Banking and Finance,32(10), 2046–2056.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reniers, G., & Dullaert, W. (2013). A method to assess multi-modal hazmat transport security vulnerabilities: Hazmat transport SVA.Transport Policy,28, 103–113.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reniers, G. L., Jongh, K. D., Gorrens, B., Lauwers, D., Leest, M. V., & Witlox, F. (2010). Transportation risk analysis tool for hazardous substances (trans)-a user-friendly, semi-quantitative multi-mode hazmat transport route safety risk estimation methodology for flanders.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,15(8), 489–496.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk.Journal of Risk,2, 21–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Samanlioglu, F. (2013). A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem.European Journal of Operational Research,226(2), 332–340.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sbihi, A., & Eglese, R. W. (2010). Combinatorial optimization and green logistics.Annals of Operations Research,175(1), 159–175.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Skiena, S. (1990).Dijkstras algorithm. Implementing discrete mathematics: Combinatorics and graph theory with mathematica. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Soleimani, H., & Govindan, K. (2014). Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk.European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2), 487–497.

• Stoyanov, S. V., Rachev, S. T., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2013). Sensitivity of portfolio VaR and CVaR to portfolio return characteristics.Annals of Operations Research,205(1), 169–187.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Toumazis, I., & Kwon, C. (2013). Routing hazardous materials on time-dependent networks using conditional value-at-risk.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,37, 73–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tsai, J. T., Wang, J. L., & Tzeng, L. Y. (2010). On the optimal product mix in life insurance companies using conditional value at risk.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,46(1), 235–241.

  Google Scholar 

• Verma, M. (2009). A cost and expected consequence approach to planning and managing railroad transportation of hazardous materials.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,14(5), 300–308.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verma, M. (2011). Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: A conditional exposure approach to minimize transport risk.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,19(5), 790–802.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2007). Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins.Computers and Operations Research,34(5), 1287–1303.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verma, M., & Verter, V. (2010). A lead-time based approach for planning rail-truck intermodal transportation of dangerous goods.European Journal of Operational Research,202(3), 696–706.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verma, M., Verter, V., & Zufferey, N. (2012). A bi-objective model for planning and managing rail-truck intermodal transportation of hazardous materials.Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review,48(1), 132–149.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang, Y. F., Faghih Roohi, S., Hu, X. M., & Xie, M. (2011). Investigations of human and organizational factors in hazardous vapor accidents.Journal of Hazardous Materials,191(1), 69–82.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yang, J., Li, F., Zhou, J., Zhang, L., Huang, L., & Bi, J. (2010). A survey on hazardous materials accidents during road transport in china from 2000 to 2008.Journal of Hazardous Materials,184(1), 647–653.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zografos, K. G., & Androutsopoulos, K. N. (2008). A decision support system for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,16(6), 684–703.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references