• Benhamou S, Poucet B (1998) Landmark use by navigating rats (Rattus norvegicus): contrasting geometric and featural information. J Comp Psychol 112:317–322

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brown AA, Spetch ML, Hurd PL (2007) Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish. Psychol Sci 18:569–573

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Burgess N (2006) Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends Cogn Sci 10:551–557

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Burgess N, Maguire E, O’Keefe J (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35:625–641

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Carey S (2009) The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1982) How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source. Nature 295:560–564

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cheng K (1986) A purely geometric module in the rats’ spatial representation. Cognition 23:149–178

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cheng K (2008) Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends Cogn Sci 12:355–361

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cheng K, Gallistel CR (1984) Testing the geometric power of an animal’s spatial representation. In: Roitblat HL, Bever TG, Terrace HS (eds) Animal cognition: Proceedings of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Conference. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 409–242

• Cheng K, Newcombe NS (2005) Is there a geometric module for spatial reorientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bull Rev 12:1–23

  Google Scholar 

• Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2008) Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Animal Cogn 11:139–146

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Collett TS, Collett M (2002) Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:542–552

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cressant A, Muller RU, Poucet B (1997) Failure of centrally placed objects to control the firing fields of hippocampal place cells. J Neurosci 17:2531–2542

  CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Doeller CF, Burgess N (2008) Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proc National Academy Sci 105:5909–5914

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Doeller CF, King JA, Burgess N (2008) Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proc National Academy Sci 105:5915–5920

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Egerton S, Callaghan V, Chernett P (2000) A biologically inspired mapping model for autonomous mobile robots. In: Mohammadin M (ed) New frontiers in computational intelligence and its applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 20–29

  Google Scholar 

• Epstein R, Kanwisher N (1998) A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392:598–601

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N (1999) The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron 23:115–125

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Epstein R, DeYoe EA, Press DZ, Rosen AC, Kanwisher N (2001) Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cogn Neuropsychol 18:481–508

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Thompson-Schill SL (2005) Learning places from views: variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. J Cogn Neurosci 17:73–83

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Etienne AS (2004) Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14:180–192

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Garrad-Cole F, Lew AR, Bremner JG, Whitaker C (2001) Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 115:317–320

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gee AP, Chekhlov D, Calway A, Mayol-Cuevas W (2008) Discovering higher level structure in visual SLAM. IEEE Trans Robotics 24:980–990

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goodridge JP, Dudchenko PA, Worboys KA, Golob EJ, Taube JS (1998) Cue control and head direction cells. Behav Neurosci 112:749–761

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gouteux S, Spelke ES (2001) Children’s use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space. Cognition 81:119–148

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Grill-Spector K (2003) The neural basis of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:159–166

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hermer L, Spelke ES (1994) A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370:57–59

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hermer L, Spelke E (1996) Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation. Cognition 61:195–232

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hermer-Vazquez L, Spelke ES, Katsnelson AS (1999) Sources of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language. Cogn Psychol 39:3–36

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hermer-Vazquez L, Moffet A, Munkholm P (2001) Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition 79:263–299

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hupbach A, Nadel L (2005) Reorientation in a rhombic environment: no evidence for an encapsulated geometric module. Cogn Dev 20:279–302

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Huttenlocher J, Lourenco SF (2007) Coding location in enclosed spaces: is geometry the principle? Dev Sci 10:741–746

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Izard V, Pica P, Spelke ES, Dehaene S (2010) Euclidean intuitions of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group (in review)

• Lakusta L, Dessalegn B, Landau B (2010) Impaired geometric reorientation caused by genetic defect. Proc National Academy Sci 107:2813–2817

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Landau B, Lakusta L (2009) Spatial representations across species: geometry, language, and maps. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:1–8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2001) Toddlers’ use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. J Exp Child Psychol 80:225–244

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Learmonth AE, Nadel L, Newcombe NS (2002) Children’s use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory. Psychol Sci 13:337–341

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Sheridan N, Jones M (2008) Why size counts: Children’s spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. Dev Sci 11:414–426

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lee SA, Spelke ES (2008) Children’s use of geometry for reorientation. Dev Sci 11:743–749

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lee SA, Spelke ES (2010a) Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: young children’s use of distance, direction, and angle in a disoriented search task (under revision)

• Lee SA, Spelke ES (2010b) Young children reorient by computing layout geometry, not by matching images of the environment (in review)

• Lee SA, Spelke ES (2010c) Modular geometric mechanisms for navigation in disoriented children. Cogn Psychol (in press)

• Lee SA, Shusterman S, Spelke ES (2006) Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems. Psychol Sci 17:577–582

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lee SA, Winkler-Rhoades N, Spelke ES (2010) Fooling the geometric module: children reorient by perceived shape of the spatial layout, not by image-matching or relational information. In: Poster presented at the 24th international attention and performance symposium on “Space, Time and Number,” Paris, France

• Lever C, Wills T, Cacucci F, Burgess N, O’Keefe J (2002) Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry. Nature 416:90–94

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lever C, Burton S, Jeewajee A, O’Keefe J, Burgess N (2009) Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation. J Neurosci 29:9771–9777

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lew AR, Gibbon B, Murphy C, Bremner JG (2010) Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children only applies to symmetrical spaces. Dev Sci 13:490–498

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lourenco SF, Huttenlocher J (2006) How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks. Cognition 100:511–529

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lourenco S, Addy D, Huttenlocher J (2009) Location representation in enclosed spaces: what types of information afford young children an advantage? J Exp Child Psychol 104:313–325

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• McGregor A, Hayward AJ, Pearce JM, Good MA (2004) Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. Behav Neurosci 118:1011–1021

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mendez MF, Cherrier MM (2003) Agnosia for scenes in topographagnosia. Neuropsychologia 41:1387–1395

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mittelstaedt ML, Mittelstaedt H (1980) Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaft 67:566

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morris RGM, Garrard P, Rawlins JNP, O’Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681–683

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nardi D, Bingman VP (2007) Asymmetrical participation of the left and right hippocampus for representing environmental geometry in homing pigeons. Behav Brain Res 178:160–171

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nardini M, Atkinson J, Burgess N (2008) Children reorient using the left/right sense of coloured landmarks at 18–24 months. Cognition 106:519–527

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nardini M, Thomas R, Knowland V, Braddick O, Atkinson J (2009) A viewpoint-independent process for spatial reorientation. Cognition 112:241–248

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Newcombe NS, Ratliff KR (2007) Explaining the development of spatial reorientation: modularity-plus-language versus the emergence of adaptive combination. In: Plumert J, Spencer J (eds) The emerging spatial mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 53–76

  Google Scholar 

• Newcombe NS, Ratliff KR, Shallcross WL, Twyman AD (2009) Young children’s use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing. Dev Sci 12:1–8

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Keefe J, Burgess N (1996) Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature 381:425–428

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press, Oxford

  Google Scholar 

• Packard MG, McGaugh JL (1996) Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65:65–72

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pitcher D, Charles L, Devlin J, Walsh V, Duchaine B (2009) Triple dissociation between faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Curr Biol 19:319–324

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Quirk GJ, Muller RU, Kubie JL (1990) The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat’s recent experience. J Neurosci 10:2008–2017

  CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ratliff KR, Newcombe NS (2008) Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view. Psychol Sci 19:1303–1307

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sheynikhovich D, Chavarriaga R, Strösslin T, Arleo A, Gerstner W (2009) Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. Psychol Rev 116:540–566

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Shusterman A, Spelke E (2005) Language and the development of spatial reasoning. In: Carruthers P, Laurence S, Stich S (eds) The structure of the innate mind. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89–106

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Shusterman A, Lee SA, Spelke ES (2008) Young children’s spontaneous use of geometry in maps. Dev Sci 11:F1–F7

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Shusterman A, Lee SA, Spelke ES (2010) Cognitive effects of language on human navigation. Cognition (in review)

• Silveira G, Malis E, Rives P (2008) An efficient direct approach to visual SLAM. IEEE Trans Robotics 24:969–979

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Solstad T, Boccara CN, Kropff E, Moser M, Moser EI (2008) Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science 322:1865–1868

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Sovrano V, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2003) Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. J Exp Psychol Animal Behav Process 29:199–210

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sovrano V, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (2006) How fish do geometry in large and small spaces. Animal Cogn 10:47–54

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spelke ES, Lee SA, Izard V (2010) Beyond core knowledge: natural geometry. Cogn Sci (in press)

• Stürzl W, Cheung A, Cheng K, Zeil J (2008) The information content of panoramic images I: the rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. J Exp Psychol Animal Behav Process 34:1–14

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sutton J (2009) What is geometric information and how do animals use it? Behav Process 80:339–343

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thrun S (2003) Robotic mapping: a survey. In: Lakemeyer G, Nebel B (eds) Exploring artificial intelligence in the new millenium. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

  Google Scholar 

• Tommasi L, Gagliardo A, Andrew RJ, Vallortigara G (2003) Separate processing mechanisms for encoding geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 17:1695–1702

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Twyman AD, Newcombe NS, Gould TJ (2009) Of mice (mus musculus) and toddlers (Homo sapiens): evidence of species-general spatial reorientation. J Comp Psychol 123:342–345

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M, Pasti G (1990) Geometric modules in animals’ spatial representation: a test with chicks. J Comp Psychol 104:248–254

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Vallortigara G, Pagni P, Sovrano V (2004) Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain. J Cogn Neurosci 16:390–400

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wang RF, Spelke ES (2002) Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn Sci 6:376–382

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wang RF, Hermer L, Spelke ES (1999) Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats. Behav Neurosci 113:475–485

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wang RF, Crowell JA, Simons DJ, Irwin DE, Kramer AF, Ambinder MS, Thomas LE, Gosney JL, Levinthal BR, Hsieh BB (2006) Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: effects of the number of objects. Psychon Bull Rev 13:281–286

  CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• White NM, McDonald RJ (2002) Multiple parallel memory systems in the brain of the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77:125–184

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Wystrach A, Beugnon G (2009) Ants learn geometry and features. Curr Biol 19:61–66

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Yonas A, Granrud CE, Pettersen L (1985) Infants’ sensitivity to relative size information for distance. Dev Psychol 21:161–167

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zugaro MB, Berthoz A, Wiener SI (2001) Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons. J Neurosci 21:1–5

  Google Scholar 

Download references