• Arn, H. 1990. Pheromones: Prophecies, economics, and the ground swell, pp. 717–722,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Arn, H. 1992. Mating disruption on its way to perfection: some thoughts, pp. 3–5,in C. Ioriatti and H. Arn (eds.). Use of Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals in Integrated Control. Bulletin OILB/SROP, XV, 5.

• Arn, H., Rauscher, S., andSchmid, A. 1979. Sex attractant formulations and traps for the grape mothEupoecilia ambiguella Hb.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 52:49–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Arn, H., Rauscher, S., Buser, H.-R., andGuerin, P.M. 1986. Sex pheromone ofEupoecilia ambiguella female: Analysis and male response to ternary blend.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1417–1429.

  Google Scholar 

• Audemard, H., Leblon, C., Neumann, U., andMarboutie, G. 1989. Bilan de sept années d'essais de lutte contre la Tordeuse orientale du pêcherCydia molesta Busck. (Lep., Tortricidae) par confusion sexuelle des mâles.J. Appl. Entomol. 108:191–207.

  Google Scholar 

• Barnes, M.M., Millar, J.G., Kirsch, P.A., andHawks, D.C. 1992. Codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) control by dissemination of synthetic female sex pheromone.J. Econ. Entomol. 85:1274–1277.

  Google Scholar 

• Bartell, R.J. 1982. Mechanisms of communication disruption by pheromone in the control of Lepidoptera: A review.Physiol. Entomol. 7:353–364.

  Google Scholar 

• Bengtsson, M., Liljefors, T., Hansson, B.S., Löfstedt, C., andCopaja, S.V. 1990. Structure-activity relationships for chain-shortened analogs of (Z)-5-decenyl acetate, a pheromone component of the turnip moth,Agrotis segetum.J. Chem. Ecol. 16:667–684.

  Google Scholar 

• Bovey, P. 1972. Super-famille des Tortricoidea,in A.S. Balachowsky (ed.). Entomologie Appliquée à l'Agriculture, Vol. II. Masson, Paris.

  Google Scholar 

• Bradley, J.D., Tremewan, W.G., andSmith, A. 1973. British Tortricoid Moths. Cochylidae and Tortricidae: Tortricinae. The Ray Society, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, D.F., Knight, A.L., Howell, J.F., Sell, C.R., Krysan, J.L., andWeiss, M. 1992. Emission characteristics of a polyethylene pheromone dispenser for mating disruption of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 85:910–917.

  Google Scholar 

• Cardé, R.T. 1990. Principles of mating disruption, pp. 47–71,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Cardé, R.T., Doane, C.C., Granett, J., andRoelofs, W.L. 1975. Disruption of pheromone communication in the gypsy moth: Some behavioral effects of disparlure and an attractant modifier.Environ. Entomol. 4:793–796.

  Google Scholar 

• Caro, J.H., Glotfelty, D.E., andFreeman, H.P. 1980. (Z)-9-Tetradecen-1-ol formate. Distribution and dissipation in the air within a corn crop after emission from a controlled-release formulation.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:229–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Caro, J.H., Freeman, H.P., Brower, D.L., andBierl-Leonhardt, B.A. 1981. Comparative distribution and persistence of disparlure in woodland after aerial application of three controlled-release formulations.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:867–880.

  Google Scholar 

• Charlton, R.E., andCardé, R.T. 1981. Comparing the effectiveness of sexual communication disruption in the Oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta) using different combinations and dosages of its pheromone blend.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:501–508.

  Google Scholar 

• Charmillot, P.-J., andPasquier, D. 1992. Comparison of three dispensers for mating disruption technique to control the summerfruit tortrixAdoxophyes orana.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 65:107–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Christensen, T.A., Mustaparta, H., andHildebrand, J.G. 1991. Chemical communication in heliothine moths. II. Central processing of intra- and interspecific olfactory messages in the male corn earwormHelicoverpa zea.J. Comp. Physiol A 169:259–274.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, H.G., McDonough, L.M., Burditt, A.K., Jr., andBierl-Leonhardt, B.A. 1984. Filbertworm sex pheromone. Identification and field tests of (E,E)- and (E,Z)-8, 10-dodecadien-1-ol acetates.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:53–61.

  Google Scholar 

• Flint, H.M., andMerkle, J.R. 1983. Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Communication disruption by pheromone composition imbalance.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:40–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Flint, H.M., andStone, M. 1985.Pectinophora scutigera (Holdaway) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Monitoring populations and disrupting sexual communication withZ,Z- andZ,E-7, 11–16: Ac in the field.J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 24:281–286.

  Google Scholar 

• Greenway, A.R. 1984. Sex pheromone of the pea moth,Cydia nigricana (F.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 10:973–982.

  Google Scholar 

• Hathaway, D.O., Moffitt, H.R., andGeorge, D.A. 1985. Codling moth (Lepid.: Tortricidae): Disruption of sexual communication with an antipheromone [(E,E)-8, 10-dodecadien-1-ol acetate].J. Entomol. Soc. B. C. 82:18–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Howell, J.F., Knight, A.L., Unruh, T.R., Brown, D.F., Krysan, J.L., Sell, C.R., andKirsch, P.A. 1992. Control of codling moth in apple and pear with sex pheromone-mediated mating disruption.J. Econ. Entomol. 85:918–925.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D.T., Lewis, B.A., andSnow, J.W. 1991. Control of grape root borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) by mating disruption with two synthetic pheromone compounds.Environ. Entomol. 20:930–934.

  Google Scholar 

• Jutsum, A.R., andGordon, R.F.S. (eds.). 1989. Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. Wiley, Chichester.

  Google Scholar 

• Karandinos, M.G., Tumlinson, J.H., andEichlin, T.D. 1977. Field evidence of synergism and inhibition in the Sesiidae sex pheromone system.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:57–64.

  Google Scholar 

• Karg, G., Sauer, A.E., andKoch, U.T. 1990. The influence of plants on the development of pheromone atmospheres measured by EAG method, p. 301,in N. Elsner and G. Roth (eds.). Brain-Perception-Cognition, Proceedings of the 18th Goettingen Neurobiology Conference. Thieme, Stuttgart.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirsch, P.A. 1992. Mating disruption: Ideas on breaking through the glass ceiling? pp. 18–26.in C. Ioriatti and H. Am (eds.). Use of Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals in Integrated Control. Bulletin OILB/SROP, XV, 5.

• Kolodny-Hirsch, D.M., andSchwalbe, C.P. 1990. Use of disparlure in the management of the gypsy moth, pp. 363–385,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Linn, C.E., Jr., Campbell, M.G., andRoelofs, W.L. 1986. Male moth sensitivity to multicomponent pheromones: Critical role of female-released blend in determining the functional role of components and active space of the pheromone.J. Chem. Ecol. 12:659–668.

  Google Scholar 

• Liu, Y.-B., andHaynes, K.F. 1992. Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background chemical noise in cabbage looper moth,Trichoplusia ni. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:299–307.

  Google Scholar 

• Marks, R.J. 1976. The influence of behaviour modifying chemicals on mating success of the red bollwormDiparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi.Bull. Entomol. Res. 66:279–300.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, E., Staten, R.T., Nowell, C., andGourd, J. 1990. Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Point source density and its relationship to efficacy in attracticide formulations of gossyplure.J. Econ. Entomol. 83:1321–1325.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J.R., andRoelofs, W.L. 1978. Gypsy moth responses to pheromone enantiomers as evaluated in a sustained flight tunnel.Environ. Entomol. 7:42–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Neumann, U. 1990. Commercial development: mating disruption of the European grape berry moth, pp. 539–546,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Neumann, U., Vogt, H., Schropp, A., Englert, W.D., andSchruft, G. 1988. Lutte par confusion sexuelle contre la Tordeuse de la grappe (Cochylis), pp. 167–174,in C. Descoins and B. Frérot (eds.). Médiateurs Chimiques: Comportement et Systématique des Lépidoptères. Applications en Agronomie. Les Colloques de l'INRA, No. 46, Paris.

• Novak, M.A., andRoelofs, W.L. 1985. Behavior of male redbanded leafroller moths,Argyrotaenia velutinana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in small disruption plots.Environ. Entomol. 14:12–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Palaniswamy, P., andUnderhill, E.W. 1988. Mechanisms of orientation disruption by sex pheromone components in the redbacked cutworm,Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Environ. Entomol. 17:432–441.

  Google Scholar 

• Palaniswamy, P., Chisholm, M.D., Underhill, E.W., Reed D.W., andPeesker, S.J. 1983. Disruption of forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) orientation to baited traps in aspen groves by air permeation with (5Z,7E)-5,7-dodecadienal.J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1159–1163.

  Google Scholar 

• Palaniswamy, P., Underhill, E.W., Gillott, C., andWong, J.W. 1986. Synthetic sex pheromone components disrupt orientation, but not mating, in the fall cankerworm,Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae).Environ. Entomol. 15:943–950.

  Google Scholar 

• Pfeiffer, D.G., Killian, J.C., Rajotte, E.G., Hull, L.A., andSnow, J.W. 1991. Mating disruption for reduction of damage by lesser peachtree borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) in Virginia and Pennsylvania peach orchards.J. Econ. Entomol. 84:218–223.

  Google Scholar 

• Pfeiffer, D.G., Kaakeh, W., Killian, J.C., Lachance, M.W., andKirsch, P. 1993. Mating disruption for control of damage by codling moth in Virginia apple orchards.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 67:57–64.

  Google Scholar 

• Preiss, R., andKramer, E. 1983. Stabilization of altitude and speed in tethered flying gypsy moth males: influence of (+) and (−)-disparlure.Physiol. Entomol. 8:55–68.

  Google Scholar 

• Priesner, E., andWitzgall, P. 1984. Modification of pheromonal behaviour in wildColeophora laricella male moths by (Z)-5-decenyl acetate, an attraction-inhibitor.J. Appl. Entomol. 98:118–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Rauscher, S., andArn, H. 1979. Mating suppression in tethered females ofEupoecilia ambiguella by evaporation of (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate in the field.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 25:16–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Rice, R.E., andKirsch, P. 1990. Mating disruption of Oriental fruit moth in the United States, pp. 193–211,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Richerson, J.V. 1977. Pheromone-mediated behavior of the gypsy moth.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:291–308.

  Google Scholar 

• Ridgway, R.L., Silverstein, R.M., andInscoe, M.N. (eds.). 1990. Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Rumbo, E.R., Deacon, S.M., andRegan, L.P. 1993. Spatial discrimination between sources of pheromone and an inhibitor by the light-brown apple mothEpiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 19:953–962.

  Google Scholar 

• Sanders, C.J. 1982. Disruption of male spruce budworm orientation to calling females in a wind tunnel by synthetic pheromone.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:493–506.

  Google Scholar 

• Sauer, A.E., Karg, G., Koch, U.T., de Kramer, J.J., andMilli, R. 1992. A portable EAG system for the measurement of pheromone concentrations in the field.Chem. Senses 17:543–553.

  Google Scholar 

• Schwalbe, C.P., andMastro, V.C. 1988. Gypsy moth mating disruption: Dosage effects.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:581–588.

  Google Scholar 

• Suckling, D.M., andClearwater, J.R. 1990. Small scale trials of mating disruption ofEpiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).Environ. Entomol. 19:1702–1709.

  Google Scholar 

• Tatsuki, S. 1990. Application of the sex pheromone of the rice stem borer moth,Chilo suppressalis, pp. 387–406,in R.L. Ridgway, R.M. Silverstein, and M.N. Inscoe (eds.). Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management: Applications of Pheromones and Other Attractants. Marcel Dekker, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Vogt, H. 1987. Several years of experience with the mating disruption technique for control of the European grape mothEupeocilia ambiguella Hbn., pp. 5–6,in H. Arn (ed.). Mating Disruption: Behaviour of Moths and Molecules. Bulletin OILB/SROP, X, 3.

• Wall, C., Sturgeon, D.M., Greenway, A.R., andPerry, J.N. 1981. Contamination of vegetation with synthetic sex attractant released from traps for the pea mothCydia nigricana.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30:111–115.

  Google Scholar 

• Webb, R.E., Tatman, K.M., Leonhardt, B.A., Plimmer, J.R., Boyd, V.K., Bystrak, P.G., Schwalbe, C.P., andDouglass, L.W. 1988. Effect of aerial application of racemic disparlure on male trap catch and female mating success of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 81:268–273.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiesner, C.J., Silk, P.J., Tan, S.-H., andFullarton, S. 1980. Monitoring of atmospheric concentrations of the sex pheromone of the spruce budworm,Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae).Can. Entomol. 112:333–334.

  Google Scholar 

• Witzgall, P., andPriesner, E. 1991. Wind tunnel study on an attraction inhibitor in maleColeophora laricella (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae).J. Chem. Ecol. 17:1355–1362.

  Google Scholar 

• Witzgall, P., Bengtsson, M., Unelius, C.R., andLöfqvist, J. 1993. Attraction of pea mothCydia nigricana F. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to female sex pheromone (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-yl acetate, is inhibited by geometric isomersE,Z,Z,E, andZ,Z.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1917–1928.

  Google Scholar 

• Yamamoto, A., andOgawa, K. 1989. Chemistry and commercial production of pheromones and other behaviour-modifying chemicals, pp. 123–148,in A.R. Jutsum and R.F.S. Gordon (eds.). Insect Pheromones in Plant Protection. John Wiley, London.

  Google Scholar 

Download references