711Accesses
3Altmetric
Abstract
The citation motivations among 51 self citing authors in several natural science disciplines were investigated. Results of a survey on reasons for both self citation and citation to others show that there are very few differences in motivation, and that there are plausible intellectual grounds for those differences which are substantial. Analysis of exposure in text reveals virtually no differences between self citations and citations to others. Analysis of individual disciplines also uncover no substantive differences in either motivation or exposure in text.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
Price includes VAT (Japan)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
S.M. Lawani, On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(1982) 281.
R. Tagliacozzo, Self-citation in scientific literature.Journal of Documentation, 33(4)(1977) 251.
P. Vinkler, A quasi-quantitative citation model,Scientometrics, 12(1987) 47.
H.W. Snyder, S. Bonzi, An enquiry into the behavior of author self citation.ASIS '89: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, New Jersey, Learned Information, 1989, pp. 147–51.
D.E. Chubin S.D. Moitra, Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?Social Studies of Science, 5(1975) 423.
M.J. Moravcsik, P. Murugesan, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5(1975) 86.
C.O. Forst, The use of citations in literature research: A preliminary classification of citation functions,Library Quarterly, 49(1979) 399.
I. Spiegel-Rösing, Bibliometric and content analysis,Social Studies of Science, 7(1977) 97.
T.A. Brooks, Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1985) 223.
P. Vinkler,op. cit. pp. 54–55.
Ibid..
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, USA
Susan Bonzi & H. W. Snyder
- Susan Bonzi
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- H. W. Snyder
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonzi, S., Snyder, H.W. Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others.Scientometrics21, 245–254 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017571
Received:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative