Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Albanian, Bulgarian, Modern Greek, and Rumanian share the following clause structure: [CP C0 [MP M0 [T/AgrP T/Agr0 [AuxP Aux0 [VP V0]]]]]. In Balkan clauses, the phrase headed by the complementizer takes a phrase headed by an invariant modal particle as complement. The Tense/Agreement complex, the auxiliaries, and the main verb follow MP. In addition, Balkan languages share interesting varieties of X0-movement for non-finite verbs, with theoretical consequences for principles of UG. In Bulgarian and Rumanian, (Long) Head-movement raises V0 to C0 across the finite Aux0, as inPročel sŭm knigata ‘I have read the book’; such structures comply with the Empty Category Principle via Relativized Minimality, and escape the Head Movement Constraint. In Albanian, Greek, and Rumanian, Head-movement places the imperative V0 in C0, as inGhrápse to ‘Write it!’. Albanian imperatives show Long Head Movement and comply with the ECP like other LHM patterns in cases where the V-stem precedes the clitic and the affix in that order:Tregoj-i-ni ‘Tell him!’. Greek and Rumanian Gerunds display Head-movement to M0, as inI Maria kratóndas to ‘Mary holding it’. In similar Albanian constructions M0 is filled, and this prevents V0-raising, as inPashë [Brixhiden [M0duke]kenduar] ‘I saw Brigitte singing’.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Baker, Mark C.: 1985a,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

  • Baker, Mark C.: 1985b, ‘Syntactic Affixation and English Gerunds’,WCCFL4, Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark C.: 1988,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1990, ‘On the Morphosyntactic Nature of the Sequence “Aux + Past Participle” in Italian, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsley, Robert and María Luisa Rivero: 1991, ‘Clitic Auxiliaries and Incorporation in Polish’, paper read at the Vienna Eurotyp Meeting, October 1991.

  • Borsley, Robert, María Luisa Rivero, and Janig Stephens: 1992, ‘Long Head Movement in Breton’, paper read at the Celtic Syntax Conference, Bangor, Wales, June 1992.

  • Brandi, Luciana and Patricia Cordin: 1989, ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 111–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin (ed.),Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demiraj, Shaban: 1986,Gramatikë Historike e Gjuhës Shqipe, University of Tirana, Faculty of History and Philology, Tirana.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, Hans: 1983, ‘On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules’, in W. Abraham (ed.),On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, Hans and Gerd Webelhuth: 1990, ‘Stranding’, in G. Grewendorf and W. Sternefeld (eds.),Scrambling and Barriers, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1987,Syntaxe du roumain. Chaines thématiques, Thèse de Doctorat d'État, Université de Paris 7, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1989, ‘Emploi du subjonctif et structure de la phrase en roumain’,Revue des Langues Romances93.2.

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1990, ‘Auxiliaries and Sentence Structure in Romanian’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1976,A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1978, ‘The Verbal complex V′-V in French’,Linguistic Inquiry9, 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, Murvet: 1987, ‘Anchoring Conditions for Tense’,Linguistic Inquiry18, 633–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka: 1982,Intentionality and Romance Subjunctive Relatives, Ph.D. dissertation distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donca: 1984, ‘Subjunctive Complements in Rumanian’, in P. Baldi (ed.),Proceedings of the 12th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, Donka: 1989, ‘On the Morpho-syntax of Subjunctive Clauses in Rumanian’,International Journal of Rumanian Studies6(2), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1991, ‘Extended Projections’, manuscript, Brandeis University.

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Armin Mester: 1988, ‘Light Verbs and Theta-Marking’,Linguistic Inquiry19, 205–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéron, Jacqueline: 1990, ‘Particles, Prepositions, and Verbs’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Rudolf: 1980,Syntax of the Modern Greek Verbal System, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack: 1988, ‘On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax’,Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax42, Lund University, pp. 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine: 1990, ‘About Agr(P)’,Linguistic Inquiry21, 551–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Brian: 1988, ‘Pronominal Affixes in Modern Greek: The Case against Clisis’,Papers from the 24th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, pp. 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Brian and Irene Philippaki-Warburton: 1987,Modern Greek, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1983, ‘Chains, Categories External, to S and French Complex Inversion’,NLLT1, 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1984,Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1985, ‘L'accord du participe passé en français et en italien’,Modèles Linguistiques7, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1989, ‘Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.),The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 239–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempchinsky, Paula: 1986,Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempchinsky, Paula: 1989, ‘Directionality of Government and Nominative Case Assignment in Romanian’, in C. Kirschner and J. DeCesaris (eds.),Studies in Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Yoshihisha: 1986,Subjects in Japanese and English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1987,Domains and Dynasties, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, Itziar: 1989, ‘Constraints on Sentence Negation: The Case of Basque’,MIT Working Papers in Linguistics10, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, José: 1989, ‘Morphologization of the Spanish Future and Conditional: Synchrony and Diachrony’, manuscript, University of Ottawa.

  • Lema, José: 1992,Licensing Conditions on Head Movement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.

  • Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1989, ‘Long Head Movement: ECP vs. HMC’,Proceedings of NELS 20, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1991, ‘Types of Verbal Movement in Old Spanish: Modals, Futures, and Perfects’,Probus3(3), 237–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, José and Maria Luisa Rivero: 1992, ‘Inverted Conjugations and V-second Effects in Romance’, in C. Laeufer and T. Morgan (eds.),Theoretical Analysis in Contemporary Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, Giuseppe: 1985, ‘Connectedness, Scope, and C-command’,Linguistic Inquiry16, 163–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, Graham: 1986,Rumanian, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell-Ginet, Sally: 1982, ‘Adverbs and Logical Form’,Language58, 144–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, Gary: 1988 ‘Singl-ing’,Linguistic Inquiry19, 611–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, Leonard, Philip Hubbard, and Peter Prifti: 1982.Standard Albanian, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, Jamal: 1990, ‘Sentential Negation, Relativised Minimality, and the Aspectual Status of Auxiliaries’,The Linguistic Review7, 183–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English’,The Journal of Philosophy70, 601–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’,Linguistics and Philosophy7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1987 ‘Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP’,Linguistic Inquiry20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1986 ‘Parameters in the Typology of Clitics in Romance and Old Spanish’,Language62, 774–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1989, ‘Estructura flexional y movimiento(s) de verbo: Futuros, condicionales, y perfectos en rumano y español medieval’, to appear in R. Lorenzo (ed.),Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Romance Linguistics and Philology, Vol. 1, Fundación Pedro Barrié de la Maza, A Coruña.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1990, ‘The Location of Non-Active Voice in Albanian and Modern Greek’,Linguistic Inquiry21, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1991a, ‘Exceptional Case Marking Effects in Rumanian Subjunctive Complements’, in D. Wanner and D. A. Kibbee (eds.),New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1991b, ‘Long Head Movement and Negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech’,The Linguistic Review8, 319–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1992a, ‘Adverb-Incorporation and the Syntax of Adverbs in Modern Greek’,Linguistics and Philosophy15, 289–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, María Luisa: to appear, ‘Auxiliares funcionales y auxiliares léxicos’, to appear inNueva Revista de Filología Hispánica in 1993 (special issue edited by Violeta Demonte).

  • Rivero, María Luisa: 1993, ‘Long Head Movement and V2 vs Null Subjects in Old Romance’,Lingua89, 217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1989,Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, ‘Speculations on Verb Second’, in J. Mascaró and M. Nespor (eds.),Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1992,Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, Catherine: 1988, ‘On Multiple Questions and Multiple Wh-fronting’,NLLT6, 445–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scatton, Ernest: 1983,A Reference Grammar of Modern Bulgarian, Slavica, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa: 1984,Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Webelhuth, Gert: 1985, ‘German is Configurational’,The Linguistic Review4, 203–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, Karen: 1988, ‘Verb-Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, Raffaella: 1989, ‘Two Types of Negative Markers’,Proceedings of NELS, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 517–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    María Luisa Rivero

Authors
  1. María Luisa Rivero

Additional information

Research for this paper was partially subsidized by Grants 410-88-0101 and 410-91-0178 from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and by the European Science Foundation under the Eurotyp Project. The first version of this paper was entitled ‘The structure of IP and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans’ and was circulated in September 1988. The present version has benefited from later joint work with José Lema on the topic of LHM, and from the comments of several very careful readers who I thank, but who are not responsible for the solutions I propose for the interesting issues they raised. For Albanian, I thank Noreen Atkins for obtaining Tosk (= standard Albanian) examples from a northern informant and for discussion of many aspects of their grammar. For Bulgarian, I thank Emil Savov and Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova. For Modern Greek, I thank Erató Kostópoulou (northern Greece) for judgments and excellent help. For Rumanian, Rodica Ionescu's assistance has been invaluable; her origin is Transylvanian. For MG I use a rough phonetic transcription, withdh, gh, andth standing for fricatives.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp