Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Ontology, Epistemology, Teleology: Triangulating Geographic Information Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series:Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

  • 1091Accesses

  • 14Citations

Abstract

For the past several years ontology has enjoyed a robust regard within the geographic information science community. Ontology is however only one apex of a triangle of knowledge that also involves epistemology and the (long discredited) notion of teleology. Without epistemology we lack a systematic understanding of the nature of the correspondence between ontologies and the general or specific domain of inquiry each of them represents. Without teleology we miss the crucial distinction – essential especially in ontologies of change – between the outcomes of causal processes on the one hand, and the results of purposeful action by sentient actors or machines on the other. This paper argues that connecting current conceptions of ontology with these two other, complementary perspectives would allow new kinds of scientific questions to be addressed as well as to expand the scope of ontology itself in geographic information science. I briefly outline an ontological framework that builds on the epistemological notion ofinformation and is guided by the teleological notion ofpurpose, and based on this sketch I suggest a possible way of completing the golden Greek triangle of geographic information science.

Was wir als Wirklichkeit wahrnehmen, ist unsere Erfindung1

(Heinz von Foerster)

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal P (2005) Ontological considerations in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 19(5): 501–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby P, Shepherd J (2000) GIS, land use, and representation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27(4): 583–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borst WN, Akkermans JM, Top JL (1997) Engineering Ontologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 46: 365–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton L (2007) Map making and map use in a multi-actor context: Spatial visualizations and frame conflicts in regional policymaking in the Netherlands. PhD Dissertation, Delft Technical University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AC (1968) 2001: A Space Odyssey, New American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn AG (2008) Mereotopology. Encyclopedia of GIS 2008: 652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (1992) Location, place, region, and space. In: Abler RF, Marcus MG and Olson JM (eds) Geography's Inner Worlds. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 215-233

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (2002) Modeling frameworks, paradigms, and approaches. In: Clarke KC, Parks BE and Crane MP (eds) Geographic information systems and environmental modeling, Longman & Co, New York, pp 34–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AU (2001) The rationality of epistemology and the rationality of ontology. Smith B and Brogaard,B (eds) Rationality and Irrationality: Proceedings of the 23rd International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp 667–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AU (2003) Ontology for spatio-temporal databases. In: Koubarakis M, Sellis T, Frank AU, Grumbach S, Güting RH, Jensen CS, Lorentzos N, Manolopoulos Y, Nardelli E, Pernici B, Schek H-J, Scholl M, Theodoulidis B, Tryfona N (eds) Spatiotemporal databases: The chorochronos approach, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2520, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Yuan M, Cova T (2007) Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographic Information Science (IJGIS) 21(3): 239–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Knowledge Acquisition 5: 199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1999) The role of identity conditions in ontology design. In: Freksa C and Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Proceedings of the International conference COSIT '99, Stade, Germany, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 221–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth JT (2008) Landscape and Purpose: modeling the functional and spatial organization of the land. PhD Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huchard M, Rouane Hacene M, Roume C and Valtchev P (2007) Relational concept discovery in structured datasets. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 49(1-4): 39–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter M, Bregt AK, Heuvelink GBM, De Bruin S, Virrantaus K (forthcoming) Spatial data quality: problems and prospects

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2003) Semantic reference systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (IJGIS) 17(5): 405–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W, Raubal M, Gärdenfors P (2007) Editorial: Cognitive semantics and spatio-temporal ontologies. Spatial Cognition and Computation 7(1): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce B (1991) Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst F (2007) Semantic Reference Systems for Observations and Measurements. PhD Thesis, University of Münster, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth A, Wiener N, Bigelow J (1943) Behavior, Purpose and Teleology. Philosophy of Science 10: 18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth CS (1998) A representational framework for geographic modeling. In: Egenhofer MJ and Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 191–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler BP, Elzas MS, G, Klir GJ, Oren TI (eds) (2001) Methodology in Systems Modelling and Simulation. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA

    Helen Couclelis

Authors
  1. Helen Couclelis

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHelen Couclelis.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. Geoinformation, TU Wien, Gußhausstr. 27-29 E127, Wien, 1040, Austria

    Gerhard Navratil

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couclelis, H. (2009). Ontology, Epistemology, Teleology: Triangulating Geographic Information Science. In: Navratil, G. (eds) Research Trends in Geographic Information Science. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88244-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp