1. Boella, G., Damiano, R., Lesmo, L.: Cooperating to the group’s utility. In: Jennings, N.R., Lesperance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 319–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Boman, M.: Norms as Constraints on Real_time Autonomous Agent Action. In: Boman, M., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1237, pp. 36–44. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

   Google Scholar 

3. Brainov, S.: The role and the impact of preferences on multi-agent interaction. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 349–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Brazier, F.M.T., Dunin Keplicz, B., Jennings, N., Treur, J.: DESIRE: Modelling Multi-Agent Systems in a Compositional Formal Framework. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, Special Issue on Formal Methods in Cooperative Information Systems: Multi-Agent Systems (Huhns, M., Singh, M. (eds.)) 6, 67–94 (1997); Preliminary shorter version in: Lesser V. (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS 1995, pp. 25–32. MIT Press, Menlo Park, VS (1995)

   Google Scholar 

5. Brazier, F.M.T., van Eck, P.A.T., Treur, J.: Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena, Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Simulations and Social Sciences, ICCS&SS 1997. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 456, pp. 103–107. Springer, Berlin (1997)

   Google Scholar 

6. Brazier, F.M.T., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Principles of Compositional Multiagent System Development. In: Cuena, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, WCC 1998, Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems, IT&KNOWS 1998, pp. 347–360 (1998)

   Google Scholar 

7. Brazier, F.M.T., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Compositional Design and Reuse of a Generic Agent Model. In: Gaines, B., Musen, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, KAW 1999, Banff (1999),http://sern.ucalgary.ca/KSI/KAW/KAW99/papers/Brazier1/KAW_brazier.pdf

8. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Teamwork. Nous 35, 487–512 (1991)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London (1995a)

   Google Scholar 

10. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Understanding the effects of norms in social groups through simulation. In: Gilbert, G.N., Conte, R. (eds.) Artificial societies: the computer simulation of social life. UCL Press, London (1995b)

    Google Scholar 

11. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: From Conventions to Prescriptions: Toward an integrated Theory of Norms. In: ModelAge 1996 Workshop, Sesimbra (January 1996) (AI&Law, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

12. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F.: Autonomous norm acceptance. In: Rao, A.S., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 99–112. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

13. Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? In: Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G. (eds.) Agents and Norms, special issue, AI&Law, vol. 7(1), pp. 1–15 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

14. Dignum, F.: Autonomous Agents and Social Norms. In: Falcone, R., Conte, R. (eds.) ICMAS 1996 Workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions, Kyoto, pp. 56–71 (1996); Revised version in In AI & Law, vol. 7(1), pp. 69–79 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

15. Hilpinen (ed.): Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel, Dordrechtz (1971)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Hogg, L., Jennings, N.R.: Variable sociability in agent-based decision making. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 305–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. Jennings, N.R.: Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 3, 223–250 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Jennings, N.R., Campos, J.R.: Towards a Social Level Characterisation of Socially Responsible Agents. IEEE Proc. on Software Engineering 144(1), 11–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Meyer, J.-J.C., Wieringa, R.J. (eds.): Deontic Logic in Computer Science. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chicester (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

20. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proc. of the Second Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

21. Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounters. MIT Press, Cambrige (1994)

    Google Scholar 

22. Shoham, Y., Tenneholtz, M.: On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (preliminary report). In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference, pp. 276–281 (1992a)

    Google Scholar 

23. Shoham, Y., Tenneholtz, M.: Emergent conventions in multi-agent systems: Initial experimental results and observations. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on KR&R, Cambridge, MA, pp. 225–232 (1992b)

    Google Scholar 

24. Wagner, T., Lesser, V.: Relating quantified motivations for organizationally situated agents. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 334–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

25. von Wright, G.: Deontic Logic. Mind 60, 58–74 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

26. Xuan, P., Lesser, V.: Incorporating uncertainty in agent commitments. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references