1. R.D. Sorkin, “A Specimen of Theory Construction from Quantum Gravity”, in J. Leplin (ed.),The Creation of Ideas in Physics: Studies for a Methodology of Theory Construction (Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Symposium in Philosophy, held Greensboro, North Carolina, March, 1989) pp. 167–179 (Number 55 in the University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995) 〈grqc/9511063〉

   Google Scholar 

2. L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer and R.D. Sorkin, “Spacetime as a causal set”,Phys. Rev. Lett.59: 521–524 (1987); C. Moore, “Comment on’ space-time as a causal set’,”Phys. Rev. Lett.60: 655 (1988); L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer and R.D. Sorkin, “Bombelli et al. Reply”,Phys. Rev. Lett.60: 656 (1988).

   Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

3. L. Bombelli,Space-time as a Causal Set, Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University (1987)

   Google Scholar 

4. G. ’t Hooft, “Quantum gravity: a fundamental problem and some radical ideas”, inRecent Developments in Gravitation (Proceedings of the 1978 Cargese Summer Institute) edited by M. Levy and S. Deser (Plenum, 1979)

   Google Scholar 

5. J. Myrheim, “Statistical geometry,” CERN preprint TH-2538 (1978)

   Google Scholar 

6. G. Brightwell and R. Gregory, “The Structure of Random Discrete Spacetime”,Phys. Rev. Lett.66: 260–263 (1991)

   Article MathSciNet ADS MATH  Google Scholar 

7. David D. Reid, “Discrete Quantum Gravity and Causal Sets”,Canadian Journal of Physics79: 1–16 (2001) 〈gr-qc/9909075〉

   Article ADS  Google Scholar 

8. Mituo Taketani, “On formation of the Newton Mechanics”,Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys.50: 53–64 (1971)

   Article ADS  Google Scholar 

9. Alfred Arthur Robb,Geometry of Time and Space (Cambridge University Press, 1936) (a revised version ofA theory of Time and Space (C.U.P. 1914))

   Google Scholar 

10. Hans Reichenbach:Physikal. Zeitschr.22: 683 (1921); andAxiomatik der relativistische Raum-Zeit-Lehre, translated into English asAxiomatization of the theory of relativity (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

11. E.C. Zeeman, “Causality Implies the Lorentz Group”,J. Math. Phys.5: 490–493 (1964)

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

12. Roger Penrose,Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity, AMS Colloquium Publications (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

13. S.W. Hawking, A.R. King and P.J. McCarthy, “A New Topology for Curved Space-Time which Incorporates the Causal, Differential and Conformal Structures”,J. Math. Phys.17: 174 (1976)

    Article MathSciNet ADS MATH  Google Scholar 

14. David Malament, “The class of continuous timelike curves determines the toplogy of space-time”,J. Math. Phys18: 1399 (1977)

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

15. Bernhard Riemann, “Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen”, inThe Collected Works of B. Riemann (Dover NY 1953)

    Google Scholar 

16. A. Einstein, Letter to Walter Dällenbach, Nov. 1916, Item 9-072 translated and cited by Stachel in the following article, page 379.

    Google Scholar 

17. A. Einstein, Letter to H.S. Joachim, August 14, 1954, Item 13-453 cited in J. Stachel, “Einstein and the Quantum: Fifty Years of Struggle”, inFrom Quarks to Quasars, Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, edited by R.G. Colodny (U. Pittsburgh Press, 1986), pages 380–381.

    Google Scholar 

18. David Finkelstein, “The space-time code”,Phys. Rev.184: 1261 (1969)

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

19. R.D. Sorkin, “Lisp Functions for Posets”, http://www.physics.syr.edu/~sorkin (version 1.0 1997, version 2.0 2002). Another poset package (using Maple) is [56].

    Google Scholar 

20. Alan Daughton, “An investigation of the symmetric case of when causal sets can embed into manifolds”Class. Quant. Grav.15: 3427–3434 (1998)

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

21. G. Brightwell and P. Winkler, “Sphere Orders”,Order6: 235–240 (1989)

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

22. Graham Brightwell, “Models of Random Partial Orders”, inSurveys in Combinatorics, 1993, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series187: 53–83, ed. Keith Walker (Cambridge Univ. Press 1993)

    Google Scholar 

23. B. Pittel and R. Tungol, “A Phase Transition Phenomenon in a Random Directed Acyclic Graph”, (Ohio State preprint, 1998) (submitted toCombinatorics, Probability and Computing)

    Google Scholar 

24. Klaus Simon, Davide Crippa and Fabian Collenberg, “On the Distribution of the Transitive Closure in a Random Acyclic Digraph”,Lecture Notes in Computer Science726: 345–356 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

25. Charles M. Newman, “Chain Lengths in Certain Random Directed Graphs”,Random Structures and Algorithms3: 243–253 (1992)

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

26. Jeong Han Kim and Boris Pittel, “On tail distribution of interpost distance” (preprint, Ohio State University and Microsoft Corp., 1999)

    Google Scholar 

27. Ioannis Raptis, “Algebraic Quantization of Causal Sets”Int. J. Theor. Phys.39: 1233–1240 (2000) 〈gr-qc/9906103〉

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

28. B. Bollobas and G. Brightwell, “The Height of a Random Partial Order: Concentration of Measure”,Annals of Applied Probability2: 1009–1018 (1992)

    Article MathSciNet MATH  Google Scholar 

29. D.A. Meyer: “Spherical containment and the Minkowski dimension of partial orders”,Order10: 227–237 (1993); andThe Dimension of Causal Sets, Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T. (1988).

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

30. R.D. Sorkin, “On the Entropy of the Vacuum Outside a Horizon”, in B. Bertotti, F. de Felice and A. Pascolini (eds.),Tenth International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation (held Padova, 4–9 July, 1983), Contributed Papers, vol. II, pp. 734–736 (Roma, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, 1983); G.’ t Hooft, “On the quantum structure of a black hole”,Nuclear Phys. B256: 727–745 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

31. L. Bombelli and D.A. Meyer, “The origin of Lorentzian geometry,”Physics Lett. A141: 226–228 (1989)

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

32. Johan Noldus, “A new topology on the space of Lorentzian metrics on a fixed manifold”Class. Quant. Grav19: 6075–6107 (2002)

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

33. Luca Bombelli, “Statistical Lorentzian geometry and the closeness of Lorentzian manifolds”,J. Math. Phys.41: 6944–6958 (2000) 〈gr-qc/0002053〉

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

34. R.D. Sorkin: “On the Role of Time in the Sum-over-histories Framework for Gravity”, paper presented to the conference on The History of Modern Gauge Theories, held Logan, Utah, July 1987, published inInt. J. Theor. Phys.33: 523–534 (1994); and “A Modified Sum-Over-Histories for Gravity”, reported inProceedings of the International Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology, Goa, India, 14–19 December, 1987, edited by B. R. Iyer, Ajit Kembhavi, Jayant V. Narlikar, and C. V. Vishveshwara, see pages 184–186 in the article by D. Brill and L. Smolin: “Workshop on quantum gravity and new directions”, pp 183–191 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    Article MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

35. R.D. Sorkin, “Forks in the Road, on the Way to Quantum Gravity”, talk given at the conference entitled “Directions in General Relativity”, held at College Park, Maryland, May, 1993, published inInt. J. Th. Phys.36: 2759–2781 (1997) 〈gr-qc/9706002〉

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

36. R.D. Sorkin, “Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Measure Theory”,Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 (No. 33): 3119–3127 (1994) 〈gr-qc/9401003〉

    Article MATH MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

37. J.B. Hartle, “Spacetime Quantum Mechanics and the Quantum Mechanics of Spacetime”, in B. Julia and J. Zinn-Justin (eds.),Les Houches, session LVII, 1992, Gravitation and Quantizations (Elsevier Science B.V. 1995)

    Google Scholar 

38. David P. Rideout and Rafael D. Sorkin, “A Classical Sequential Growth Dynamics for Causal Sets”,Phys. Rev. D61: 024002 (2000) 〈gr-qc/9904062〉

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

39. David P. Rideout,Dynamics of Causal Sets, Ph.D. thesis (Syracuse University 2001)

    Google Scholar 

40. T. Jacobson, “Black Hole Entropy and Induced Gravity”, 〈gr-qc/9404039〉; S.L. Adler, “Einstein gravity as a symmetry-breaking effect in quantum field theory”,Reviews of Modern Physics54: 729–766 (1982); V.A. Kazakov, “The appearance of matter fields from quantum fluctuations of 2D-gravity”,Mod. Phys. Lett. A4: 2125–2139 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

41. R.D. Sorkin: “First Steps with Causal Sets”, in R. Cianci, R. de Ritis, M. Francaviglia, G. Marmo, C. Rubano, P. Scudellaro (eds.),General Relativity and Gravitational Physics (Proceedings of the Ninth Italian Conference of the same name, held Capri, Italy, September, 1990), pp. 68–90 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); and “Spacetime and Causal Sets”, in J.C. D’Olivo, E. Nahmad-Achar, M. Rosenbaum, M.P. Ryan, L.F. Urrutia and F. Zertuche (eds.),Relativity and Gravitation: Classical and Quantum (Proceedings of theSILARG VII Conference, held Cocoyoc, Mexico, December, 1990), pages 150–173 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

42. R.D. Sorkin, Two Talks given at the 1997 Santa Fe workshop: “A Review of the Causal Set Approach to Quantum Gravity” and “A Growth Dynamics for Causal Sets”, presented at: “New Directions in Simplicial Quantum Gravity” July 28–August 8, 1997. The scanned in transparencies may be viewed at http://t8web.lanl.gov/people/emil/Slides/sf97talks.html; Y. Jack Ng and H. van Dam, “A small but nonzero cosmological constant”, (Int. J. Mod. Phys D., to appear) 〈hep-th/9911102〉

    Google Scholar 

43. Maqbool Ahmed, Scott Dodelson, Patrick Greene and Rafael D. Sorkin, “Everpresent Λ”, 〈astro-ph/0209274〉

    Google Scholar 

44. Djamel Dou, “Causal Sets, a Possible Interpretation for the Black Hole Entropy, and Related Topics”, Ph. D. thesis (SISSA, Trieste, 1999) 〈gr-qc/0106024〉. See also Dj. Dou and R.D. Sorkin, “Black Hole Entropy as Causal Links”,Foundations of Physics (2003, to appear).

    Google Scholar 

45. R.D. Sorkin, “Toward an Explanation of Entropy Increase in the Presence of Quantum Black Holes”,Phys. Rev. Lett.56: 1885–1888 (1986)

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

46. Edward Witten, “Quantum Gravity in De Sitter Space” 〈hep-th/0106109〉

    Google Scholar 

47. Graham Brightwell, H. Fay Dowker, Raquel S. García, Joe Henson and Rafael D. Sorkin, “General Covariance and the ‘Problem of Time’ in a Discrete Cosmology”, in K.G. Bowden, Ed.,Correlations, Proceedings of the ANPA 23 conference, held August 16–21, 2001, Cambridge, England (Alternative Natural Philosophy Association, London, 2002), pp 1–17 〈gr-qc/0202097〉

    Google Scholar 

48. Graham Brightwell, Fay Dowker, Raquel Garcia, Joe Henson and Rafael D. Sorkin, ““Observables” in Causal Set Cosmology”, 〈gr-qc/0210061〉

    Google Scholar 

49. Xavier Martin, Denjoe O’Connor, David Rideout and Rafael D. Sorkin, “On the “renormalization” transformations induced by cycles of expansion and contraction in causal set cosmology”,Phys. Rev. D63: 084026 (2001) 〈gr-qc/0009063〉

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

50. Rafael D. Sorkin, “Indications of causal set cosmology”,Int. J. Theor. Ph.39(7): 1731–1736 (2000) (an issue devoted to the proceedings of the Peyresq IV conference, held June–July 1999, Peyresq France) 〈gr-qc/0003043〉

    Article MATH MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

51. Avner Ash and Patrick McDonald, “Moment problems and the causal set approach to quantum gravity”, 〈gr-qc/0209020〉

    Google Scholar 

52. A.R. Daughton,The Recovery of Locality for Causal Sets and Related Topics, Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

53. Roberto Salgado, Ph.D. thesis, Syracuse University (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

54. Richard F. Blute, Ivan T. Ivanov, Prakash Panangaden, “Discrete Quantum Causal Dynamics”, 〈gr-qc/0109053〉

    Google Scholar 

55. Fay Dowker, “Topology Change in Quantum Gravity”, 〈gr-qc/0206020〉

    Google Scholar 

56. John R. Stembridge (jrs@math.lsa.umich.edu),A Maple Package for Posets: Version 2.1, (Ann Arbor 1998-may-10) available at www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~jrs

    Google Scholar 

57. David P. Rideout and Rafael D. Sorkin, “Evidence for a continuum limit in causal set dynamics”,Phys. Rev. D63: 104011 (2001) 〈gr-qc/0003117〉

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

58. F. Markopoulou and L. Smolin, “Causal evolution of spin networks”,Nuc. Phys.B508: 409–430 (1997) 〈gr-qc/9702025〉

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

59. R.D. Sorkin, “Percolation, Causal Sets and Renormalizability”, unpublished talk delivered at the RG2000 conference, held in Taxco, Mexico, January 1999

    Google Scholar 

60. David P. Rideout and Rafael D. Sorkin, “Evidence for a Scaling Behavior in Causal Set Dynamics”, (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

61. L. Smolin, “The fate of black hole singularities and the parameters of the standard models of particle physics and cosmology”, 〈gr-qc/9404011〉

    Google Scholar 

62. Roberto B. Salgado, “Some Identities for the Quantum Measure and its Generalizations”,Mod. Phys. Lett.A17: 711–728 (2002) 〈gr-qc/9903015〉

    MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

63. Fay Dowker and Rafael D. Sorkin, “Toward an Intrinsic Definition of Relativistic Causality” (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

64. A. Criscuolo and H. Waelbroeck, “Causal Set Dynamics: A Toy Model”,Class. Quant. Grav.16: 1817–1832 (1999) 〈gr-qc/9811088〉

    Article MathSciNet ADS MATH  Google Scholar 

65. Joohan Lee and Rafael D. Sorkin, “Limits of Sequential Growth Dynamics” (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

66. T. Jacobson, “Black-hole evaporation and ultrashort distances”,Phys. Rev. D44: 1731–1739 (1991))

    Article MathSciNet ADS  Google Scholar 

67. Curtis Greene et al.,A Mathematica Package for Studying Posets (Haverford College, 1990, 1994) available at www.haverford.edu/math/cgreene.html

    Google Scholar 

68. C.D. Broad,Scientific Thought (Harcourt Brace and Company, 1923)

    Google Scholar 

Download references