• Akin O (1978) How do architects design? Artificial intelligence and pattern recognition. In: Latombe J-C (ed) Computer-aided design. North-Holland, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Bedau MA (2003) Artificial life: organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up.Cognit Sci 7(11):505–512

  Google Scholar 

• Bernt M, Rink D (2010) Not relevant to the system: the crisis in the backyards. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(3):678–685.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00985.x

• Boano C, Astolfo G (2015) Speculations on the Italian rhetoric of mending peripheries [Digital scholarly resource].http://quaderns.coac.net/en/2015/01/mending-peripheries/

• Borgo S, Stufano Melone MR (2019) How architectural rules make room for creativity: an ontology-driven analysis: an ontology-drive analysis, in TriCoLore 2018 creativity—cognition.http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2347

• Brenner N (2018) Debating planetary urbanization: For an engaged pluralism. In: Latombe JC (ed) Environment and planning D: society and space. IFIP, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Brenner N, Schmid C (2011) Planetary urbanization. In: Gandy M (ed) Urban constellations. Jovis, Berlin, pp 10–13

  Google Scholar 

• Brenner N, Schmid C (2015) Towards a new epistemology of the urban. City 19(2–3):151–182

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Checkland P (1978) The origins and nature of ‘hard’ systems thinking. J Appl Syst Anal 5:99–110

  Google Scholar 

• Dorst K (2006) Design issues. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Eastman CM (1969) Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Washington, DC

  Google Scholar 

• Eastman CM (1970) On the analysis theory, based in cognitive s, emerging methods. In: Moore GT (ed) Environmental design and planning. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. Sage, London

  Google Scholar 

• Epprecht N, von Wirth T, Stünzi C, Blumer YB (2014) Anticipating transitions beyond the current mobility regimes: how acceptability matters. Futures 60:30–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.001

• Evans G, Shaw P (2004) The contribution of culture to regeneration in UK: a review of evidence, a report to DCMS, LondonMet, cit. In Comunian R, Sacco PL, Newcastle-Gateshead: riqualificazione urbana e limiti della città creativa, DADI-IUAV, Marsilio, Venezia, 2006

  Google Scholar 

• Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (1996) From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Mag 17:3

  Google Scholar 

• Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how It’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fusco Girard L, Nijkamp P (2004) Energia, bellezza, partecipazione: La sfida della sostenibilitá. In: Valutazioni integrate tra conservazione e sviluppo. Angeli, Milano

  Google Scholar 

• Geneletti D, La Rosa D, Spyra M, Cortinovis C (2017) A review of approaches and challenges for sustainable planning in urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 165:231–243

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glass R (1964) London: aspects of change. Centre for Urban Studies, UCL, London

  Google Scholar 

• Grant JL (2009) Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Plan Theory Pract 10:11–33

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hall P (1966) The world cities. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

  Google Scholar 

• Harvey D (1989) The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Blackwell, London

  Google Scholar 

• Hatchuel A, Pascal Le Masson P, Weil B (2002) From knowledge management to design-oriented organisations. Int Soc Sci J 54(171):25–37

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hochstenbach C, Musterd S (2018) Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods. Urban Geogr 39(1):26–53.https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1276718

• Kallin H, Slater T (2014) Activating territorial stigma: gentrifying marginality on Edinburgh’s periphery. Environ Plan A 46:1351–1368.https://doi.org/10.1068/a45634

• Kazakci A (2013) On the imaginative constructivist nature of design: a theoretical approach. Res Eng Des 24(2):127–145

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kazakci A (2014) Conceptive artificial intelligence: insights from design theory. In: International design conference DESIGN 2014, Croatia, pp 1–16

  Google Scholar 

• Kelly G (1955) The psychology of personal constructs. Norton & Company, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Kelly G (1970) A brief introduction to personal construct theory. Academic Press, London

  Google Scholar 

• La Rosa D, Geneletti D, Spyra M, Luther M, Albert C (2017) Editorial. Special issue on sustainable planning approaches for urban peripheries. Landsc Urban Plan 165:172–176

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ley D (2003) Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Stud 40:2527–2544

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Manzione L (2014) Rammendo nel vuoto.https://www.archphoto.it/archives/3329

• Meij J (2002) Dealing with the data flood: mining data. Beweton, The Hague

  Google Scholar 

• Midgley G (1997) Mixing methods: developing systemic intervention. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: the theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 249–290

  Google Scholar 

• Montibeller G, Franco A (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis for strategic decision making. In: Zopounidis C, Pardalos P (eds) Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Applied optimization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  Google Scholar 

• Munda G (2004) Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur J Oper Res 158(3):662–677

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ostanel E (2017) Rigenerazione Urbana e Innovazione sociale in periferia. Quali competenze quali coinvolgimenti. In: AA. VV., Atti della XIX Conferenza Nazionale SIU. Cambiamenti. Responsabilità e strumenti per l'urbanistica al servizio del paese, vol 2016. Planum Publisher, Roma-Milano, pp 1281–1285

  Google Scholar 

• Parés M, Martì-Costa M, Blanco I (2014) Geographies of governance: how place matters in urban regeneration policies. Urban Stud 51(15):3250–3267

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Phelps NA, Tarazona Vento A, Roitman S (2015) The suburban question: grassroots politics and place making in Spanish suburbs. Environ Plann 33:512–532

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Piano R (2014) Diversamente Politico, in Periferie, p. 12.https://www.renzopianog124.com/pubblicazioni/

• Pluchinotta I, Kazakci AO, Giordano R, Tsoukiàs A (2019) Design theory for generating alternatives in public decision making processes. Group Decis Negot 28:341–374

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raco M, Street E (2012) Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of post-recession development in London and Hong Kong. Urban Stud 49:1065–1087

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rey-Valette H, Mathé S, Salles JM (2017) An assessment method of ecosystem services based on stakeholders perceptions: the rapid ecosystem services participatory appraisal (RESPA). Ecosyst Serv 28:311–319

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Roberts P (2002) The evaluation, definition and purposes of urban regeneration. In: Roberts P, Sykes H (eds) Urban regeneration. a handbook. SAGE, London, pp 9–36

  Google Scholar 

• Rosenhead J, Mingers J (2001) A new paradigma of analysis. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, Second edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–19

  Google Scholar 

• Roy B (1990) Decision aid and decision making. In: Bana e Costa CA (ed) Readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–35

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Sager T (2001) Planning styles and agency properties. Environ Plan A 33:509–532

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salet W, Savini F (2015) The political governance of urban peripheries. Environ Plann 33:448–456

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salone C (2018) Contested urban regeneration in ‘deprived’ inner areas. In: Baron N, Romero J (eds) Practices and policies in Barriera di Milano, Turin (Italy). Cultura territorial e innovacion social Publicacions Universitat de Valencia, Valencia

  Google Scholar 

• Sassen S (1991) The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  Google Scholar 

• Sassen S (2005) The global city: introducing a concept, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  Google Scholar 

• Savini F, Majoor S, Salet W (2015) Urban peripheries: reflecting on politics and projects in Amsterdam, Milan, and Paris. Environ Plan 33(3):457–474.https://doi.org/10.1068/c13132

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Secchi B (1989) Un progetto per l’urbanistica. Einaudi, Torino

  Google Scholar 

• Smith N (1979) Toward a theory of gentrification a Back to the City movement by capital, not people. J Am Plann Assoc 45(4):538–548

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stake R (1995) The art of case study research. SAGE, London

  Google Scholar 

• Swyngedouw E, Moulaert F, Rodriguez A (2002) Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34:542–577

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Swyngedouw E, Kaika M (2014) Urban political ecology. Great promises, deadlock... and new beginnings?. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica 60(3):459–481

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor PJ, Lang RE (2004) The shock of the new: 100 concepts describing recent urban change. Environ Plan A 36:951–958.https://doi.org/10.1068/a375

• Tsoukias A, Montibeller G, Lucertini G, Belton V (2013) Policy analytics: an agenda for research and practice. EURO J Decis Process 1:115–134

  Google Scholar 

• UN-Habitat (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of cities. Routledge

  Google Scholar 

• Wagner M, de Vries WT (2019) Comparative review of methods supporting decision-making in urban development and land management. Landarzt 8:123

  Google Scholar 

• Waitt GR (2005) Doing discourse analysis. In: Hay I (ed) Qualitative research methods in human geography. Oxford University Press, London, pp 163–191

  Google Scholar 

• Watson V (2016) Shifting approaches to planning theory: global north and south. Urban Plan 1:4

  Google Scholar 

• Wilkinson C (2012) Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plan Theory 11:148–169

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yin R (2018) Case study research. SAGE, Los Angeles

  Google Scholar 

Download references