Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

On the History and Technology of the Atomic Bomb. The Commitment of the Scientists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series:History of Mechanism and Machine Science ((HMMS,volume 27))

  • 1603Accesses

Abstract

The development of the atomic bomb in the first half of the twentieth century marked a turning point in the history of nuclear science because it revealed the close relationships that exist among science, technology and society. In this paper the main discoveries that led to the scientific and technological development of the atomic bomb are presented together with the commitment of scientists who tried to avoid possible harmful uses of the results of their researches.

In this work a deep examination of the writings of some of these scientists is introduced, some of which are still unpublished, although already quoted by several authors, with the purpose to highlight the relevance of their position against the bomb to the present day. In this sense the content of the paper may appear as a novelty within the history of science and technology; even if it cannot be a unique story.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    1Rutherford won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1908 “for his investigations into the disintegration of the elements and the chemistry of radioactive substances”, although the chemist of the team was Soddy. He gained due recognition only with the Nobel Prize in 1921 “for his contributions to our knowledge of the chemistry of radioactive substances and his investigations into the origin and nature of isotopes”. In 1913, in fact, he had found that certain elements exist in two or more forms with different atomic weights but they are chemically indistinguishable. Between 1911 and 1913, he had also formulated the Law of radioactive displacement, which refers to the fact that the emission of an α particle by an element moves it back two places in the periodic table, while the emission of a β particle situates it in one position forward. His naming to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences was proposed by Rutherford (and supported by Thomson), as if to repay the debt contract with Soddy on the occasion of the Nobel Prize in 1908.

  2. 2.

    In March 1903, Pierre Curie (1859–1906) and Albert Laborde (1878–1968) had measured the heat developed in a Bunsen ice calorimeter from a known amount of radio in a defined time. They found enormous values of the order of 100 calories per hour for a single gram of radium (Curie and Laborde1903). These authors, however, did not consider it possible that this heat was developed at the expense of the internal energy of the radium but they thought that it came from a source outside the atom, of unknown nature (on this topic see Soddy1904b, Chap. XI entitled “The energy of radio-active change”, pp. 165–170).

  3. 3.

    Soddy (1953, f 282, 2, line 6).

  4. 4.

    In this science fiction novel, H. G. Wells predicts, about 20 years in advance, the discovery of artificial radioactivity, the industrial use of atomic energy and a global conflict resulting from the use of “atomic bombs”, with the devastation of the main cities of the planet (Wells1914).

  5. 5.

    See the 6th paragraph and Cioci (2008).

  6. 6.

    Soddy (1915, p. 13, line 19).

  7. 7.

    The Sydney Morning Herald (1935, f 124, line 43).

  8. 8.

    Soddy (1949, p. 128, column 1, line 52). For the significant contribution made by Soddy to economics, linked to his commitment to the prevention of war, see Cioci (2009a).

  9. 9.

    Heavy water was considered to be slow motion par excellence because deuterium has a light nucleus, suitable to subtract kinetic energy from neutrons, and being already formed by a neutron and a proton it was believed to be not “inclined” to absorb neutrons. The research started eventually in Montreal after the war with construction of the atomic pile ZEEP, the origin of the CANDU reactors.

  10. 10.

    F. Rasetti (1958–1968, p. 11, line 2). Information about this document can be found in Amaldi (1990, p. 175, footnote 15). The document was widely quoted by Battimelli and De Maria in the “Preface” of Amaldi (1997) and by Maltese (2003).

  11. 11.

    Ivi, line 4.

  12. 12.

    Battimelli (2002), Maltese (2003). These authors reported Edoardo Amaldi’s assessments; he considered the decision to work in the Manhattan Project as a necessary assumption of responsibility by scientists to prevent the world being conquered by the Nazis using nuclear weapons: “If I had found myself there (in front of this dramatic dilemma), after deep and painful considerations on which it was my moral duty of man asked to decide whether cooperate in the defense of democracies … or lock myself in my private life, doing nothing to fight the dictatorship, I would have eventually opted for the first solution” (Amaldi1997, p. 98, line 32).

  13. 13.

    Amaldi (1979, p. 199, column 2, line 13).

  14. 14.

    Associated Press (1933, p. 1, line 18). A summary of the presentation at the British Association is published in the Times of September 12, 1933, p. 7 and of Nature, no. 132, pp. 432–433 (16 September 1933).

  15. 15.

    Szilard (1972, pp. 729–732; 1978, pp. 45–46).

  16. 16.

    E. Amaldi (1984, p. 160, line 27).

  17. 17.

    The exact critical mass for uranium 235 is 52 kg. The critical mass for plutonium 239 is 10 Kg.

  18. 18.

    Frisch and Peierls (1940b, p. 86, line 15).

  19. 19.

    United States Atomic Energy Commission (1971, p. 12, line 4).

  20. 20.

    Weisskopf (1967, p. 40, column 1, line 19; 42, column 1, line 11).

  21. 21.

    Smyth (1945, p. 254, line 16).

  22. 22.

    Rotblat (1985, p. 18, line 22).

  23. 23.

    Committee on Social and Political Implications (1946, p. 3, column 3, line 34).

  24. 24.

    Oppenheimer (1948, p. 66, line 45).

  25. 25.

    The account of A. K. Smith is entitled “A peril and a Hope” by a famous expression of Oppenheimer according to which nuclear weapons would constitute a danger and a hope for humanity because given the power of these terrible means of destruction humankind would have to give up war to settle international disputes and would have to create a united world under the law and humanity.

  26. 26.

    Smith and Weiner (1980).

  27. 27.

    Oppenheimer (1966, line 20).

  28. 28.

    Lilienthal et al. (1946, p. 24, line 15).

  29. 29.

    For further arguments in favour of this conclusion see Cioci (2004).

  30. 30.

    General Advisory Committee (1949, p. 155, line 39).

  31. 31.

    Ivi, line 21.

  32. 32.

    Ibidem, 156, line 6.

  33. 33.

    See Capuozzo and Cioci (2010).

  34. 34.

    E.g. see: Teller (1950).

References

  • Amaldi E (1979) Gli anni della ricostruzione (The years of reconstruction). Giornale di Fisica 20(3):186–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaldi E (1984) From the discovery of the neutron to the discovery of nuclear fission. Physics Reports 111(Sept):1–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaldi E (1990) The case of physics (Il caso della fisica. Le conseguenze culturali delle leggi razziali. Atti dei convegni lincei, Roma 84: 107–133). In: Battimelli G, Paoloni G (eds) 20th century physics: essays and recollections. A selection of historical writings by Edoardo Amaldi (1998). World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaldi E (1997) Da via Panisperna all’America (From via Panisperna to America). Editori Riuniti, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson HL, Fermi E, Hanstein HB (1939) Production of neutrons in uranium bombarded by neutrons. Physical Review 55:797–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (September 1933) Atom-powered world absurd, scientists told. New York Herald Tribune, pp 1, 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Battimelli G (2002) Era un ragazzo di via Panisperna (He was a boy from via Panisperna). Lett Matematica 42:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N (1936) Neutron capture and nuclear constitution. Nature 137:344–348, 351

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N (1939) Disintegration of heavy. Nuclei. Nature 143:330.

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N, Kalckar F (1937) On the transmutation of atomic nuclei by impact of material particles. I. General theoretical remarks. Mat-Fys Medd Dan Vidensk Selsk 14(10):1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N, Wheeler JA (1939) The mechanism of nuclear fission. Physical Review 56:426–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A (2012) Keeper of the nuclear conscience. The life and works of Joseph Rotblat. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher SI (2005) The origins of the Russell-Einstein Manifesto. Pugwash History Series 1:3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Capuozzo L, Cioci V (2010) La Fisica, le origini della biologia molecolare e dell’Ingegneria genetica: il caso della conferenza di asilomar (Physics, the origins of molecular biology and genetic engineering: the case of the Asilomar Conference). In: Giannetto E, Giannini G, Toscano M (eds) Relatività, quanti, chaos e altre rivoluzioni della fisica (Proceedings of the XXVII SISFA Congress). Guaraldi, Rimini, pp 357–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioci V (2004) Una rivisitazione del caso Oppenheimer (A review of Oppenheimer case). In: Tucci P, Garuccio A, Nigro M (eds) Proceedings of the XXIII SISFA Congress. Progedit, Bari, pp 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioci V (2007) Storia e confronto di tre diverse posizioni di fisici contro la bomba atomica (History and comparison of three different positions of physicists against the atomic bomb). In: Leone M, Preziosi B, Robotti N (eds) L’eredità di Fermi Majorana e altri temi. Atti del XXIV Congresso della Società Italiana degli Storici della Fisica e dell’Astronomia. Proceedings of the XXIV SISFA Congress. Bibliopolis, Naples, pp 211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioci V (2008) Science fiction e realtà: La liberazione del mondo di H. G. Wells e il suo influsso sugli scienziati atomici. (Science fiction and reality: The world set free by HG Wells and his influence on the atomic scientists). In: Pitrelli N, Ramani D, Sturloni G (eds) Proceedings of the VI Italian national conference on science communication. Polimetrica, Monza, pp 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioci V (2009a) Frederick Soddy, un chimico alle frontiere della conoscenza, fra Fisica, Economia, Matematica ed Ecologia (Frederick Soddy, a chemist at the frontiers of knowledge, among physics, economics, mathematics and ecology). In: Calascibetta F (ed) Proceedings of the XIII National Congress of History and Fundamentals of Chemistry, Excerpt from vol 127, Memoirs of Physical and Natural Sciences, Proceedings of the Italian National Academy of Sciences called Academy of Forty, ser. 5, vol 33, part II, vol II, pp 319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioci V (2009b) Edoardo Amaldi e il rifiuto delle applicazioni militari della fisica nucleare (Edoardo Amaldi and the refusal of the military applications of nuclear physics). Proceedings of the XLVII AIF Congress, Supplement to LNFS 42(3): 50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Social and Political Implications (1946) A report to the secretary of war (Frank report). Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 1(10):2–4, 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie P, Laborde A (1903) Sur la chaleur dégagée spontanément par les sels de radium. Comptes Rendus 136(sem.1):673–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A (1905) Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content? (Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seimen Eneirgieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik, ser. 4, 18:639–641). In: Einstein A (1989) Collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 172–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A (1907) On the relativity principle and the conclusion drawn from it (Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität 4:411–62; 5:98–99). In: Einstein A (1989) Collected papers of Albert Einstein, vol 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 252–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A (1910) Principe de relativité et ses conséquences dans la physique moderne. Archives des sciences physiques et naturelles (Series 4), 29:5–28,125–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein A (1989) Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol 2. The Swiss years: writings, 1900–1909. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (English translation supplement. Beck A (tr), Havas P (con), Buchwald DK (g ed))

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermi E (1934) Possible production of elements of atomic number higher than 92. Nature 133:898–899

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fermi E, Amaldi E, D’Agostino O, Rasetti F, Segré E (1934) Artificial radioactivity produced by neutron bombardment—I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 146(857):483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch O (1939) Physical evidence for the division of heavy nuclei under neutron bombardment. Nature 143:276

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch O, Peierls R (1940a) Memorandum on the properties of a radioactive “superbomb”. In: Serber R (ed) The Los Alamos primer. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 80–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch O, Peierls R (1940b) On the construction of a “super-bomb”; based on a nuclear chain reaction in uranium. In: Serber R (ed) The Los Alamos primer. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • General Advisory Committee (1949) Report of GAC to the U. S. atomic energy commission, October 30. In: York HF (ed) The advisors. Oppheneimer, teller and the superbomb (1976). Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 150–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn O, Strassmann F (1939) Concerning the existence of alkaline earth metals resulting from neutron irradiation of uranium (Über den Nachweis und das Verhalten der bei der Bestrahlung des Urans mittels Neutronen entstehenden Erdalkalimetalle. Die Naturwissenschaften 27:11–15). Am J Phys 32:9–15 (English Translation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw VGJ (1949) Einstein’s social philosophy. In: Schilpp AP (ed) Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist. Volume VII in the Library of Living Philosophers, MJF Books, New York, pp 649–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age (Das Prinzip Verantwortung, Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1979) (trans: H Jonas, D Herr). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1997) Tecnica medicina ed etica. Prassi del principio responsabilità. (Technik, Medizin und Ethik: Zur Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung. Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1985) (trans: P Becchi, A Benussi). Einaudi, Torino. (Not translated into English yet)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones VC (1985) Manhattan: the army and the atomic bomb. United States Army, Washington (Center of military history)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipphardt H (1964) In the matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer; a play freely adapted on the basis of the documents. Hill & Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienthal DE (Chairman), Barnard CI, Oppenheimer JR, Thomas CA, Winne HA (1946) A report on the international control of atomic energy prepared for the secretary of state’s committee on atomic energy (Acheson-Lilienthal report). U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltese G (2003) Enrico Fermi in America. Una biografia scientifica: 1938–1954 (Enrico Fermi in America. A scientific biography: 1938–1954). Zanichelli, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Meitner L, Frisch OR (1939) Disintegration of uranium by neutrons: a new type of nuclear reaction. Nature 143:239–40

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer JR (1948) Physics in the contemporary world. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 4(3):65–68, 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer JR (1966) Draft letter to David Bohm, 2 December Library of congress. Manuscript division, Papers of J. R. Oppenheimer, box 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais A (1982) Subtle is the lord. The science and the life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peierls R (1974) Oppenheimer J. Robert. In: Gillispie CC (ed) Dictionary of scientific biography, vol X. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, pp 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay W, Soddy F, (1904) Further experiments on the production of helium from radium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 73:346–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasetti F (1955) Fermi. Science 121(1344):449–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasetti F (1958–1968) Biographical notes and scientific work of Franco Rasetti, unpublished typescript preserved in the Amaldi Archives, Department of Physics, Rome University “La Sapienza”, sc. 1E, fasc. 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasetti F (1968) Enrico Fermi e la fisica italiana (Enrico Fermi and the Italian physics). In: Celebrazioni Lincee in ricordo di Enrico Fermi. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma, pp 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R (1986) The making of atomic bomb. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotblat J (1985) Leaving the bomb project. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 41(7):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell BAW, Einstein A (1955) Texts of scientists’ appeal for abolition of war. The New York Times, 10 July, p 25. (The Russell-Einstein Manifesto). Issued in London, 9 July 1955, and signed also by Born M, Bridgman PW, Infeld AL, Joliot-Curie F, Muller HJ, Pauling L, Powell CF, Rotblat J, Yukawa H. Reprinted in: Bone AG (ed) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol 28. Man’s Peril, 1954–1955. Routledge, London and New York, pp 259–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E, Soddy F (1902a) The cause and nature of radioactivity, parts I and II. Philosophical Magazine (Series 6) 4:370–396, 569–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E, Soddy F (1902b) The radioactivity of thorium compounds, parts I and II. Transactions of Journal of the Chemical Society 81:837–860, 837–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford E, Soddy F (1903) Radioactive change. Philosophical Magazine (Series 6) 5:576–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AK (1971) A peril and a hope. The scientists’ movement in America 1945–47. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AK, Weiner C (eds) (1980) Robert Oppenheimer. Letters and recollections. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth HD (1945) Atomic energy for military purposes. The official report on the development of the atomic bomb under the auspices of the United States Government, 1940–1945. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (Reprinted by Maple Press, York, Pennsylvania)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1903a) Some recent advances in radioactivity. Contemporary Review 83(May):708–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1903b) Possible future applications of radium. Times Literature Supplement 17:225–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1904a) Radium. Professional Papers of the Royal Corps of Engineers 29:237–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1904b) Radio-activity: an elementary treatise from the standpoint of the disintegration theory. The electrician, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1906) The internal energy of elements. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers 37:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1909) The interpretation of radium. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1915) The social effect of recent advances in physical sciences. In: Professor Frederick Soddy Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS Eng Misc b179, ff. 542–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1926) Wealth, virtual wealth and debt. The solution of the economic paradox. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1934) Suggestion to the ordinary fellows of the royal society for a reform group to uphold their rights. In: Professor Frederick Soddy Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS. Eng. misc. b170, f 147

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F ( 1945) The moving finger writes […] Cavalcade, August 18, pp 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1949) The story of atomic energy. Nova Atlantis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soddy F (1953) Correspondence with Sir Harold Hartley. In: Professor Frederick Soddy Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS Eng Misc b189, ff 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilard L (1972) The collected works of Leo Szilard: scientific papers. Edited by Feld BT, Weiss Szilard G. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilard L (1978) His Version of the Facts. Selected Recollections and Correspondence. Edited by Weart SR, Weiss Szilard G. The Mit Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Szilard L, Zinn WH (1939) Instantaneous emission of fast neutrons in the interaction of slow neutrons with uranium. Physical Review 55:799–800

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Teller E (1950) Back to the laboratories. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 6(3):71

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sydney Morning Herald (1935) Royal society. Demand for Reform., December 23, N.S.W., Australia. In: Professor Frederick Soddy Papers, Bodleian Library, Oxford, MS. Eng. misc. b170, f 124

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Atomic Energy Commission (1971) In the matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Transcript of hearing before personnel security board and texts of principal documents and letters. Foreword by Stern PM. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • von Halban H, Joliot F, Kowarski L (1939) Liberation of neutrons in the nuclear explosion of uranium. Nature 143:470–471

    Article MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Weart S (1982) The road to Los Alamos. Journal De Physique (Colloque C8, suppl au n 12) 43:301–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskopf V (1967) The Los Alamos years. In: A memorial to Oppenheimer. Physics Today 20(10):39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells HG (1914) The world set free. A story of mankind. Macmillan and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Professor Giovanni Battimelli, Referent for Documents and Sources for the History of Physics, Department of Physics, University “La Sapienza” of Rome, who helped me in the consultation of the Edoardo Amaldi Archives.

My special thanks is addressed to Colin Harris, Superintendent of the Special Collections Reading Rooms, for his help in finding the unpublished writings of Frederick Soddy , to Dr. Chris Fletcher, Keeper of Special Collections, and to the Bodleian Library, Oxford University, which owns them, for permission given on the basis of ‘non-exclusive rights’ to quote and to paraphrase them.

I am grateful to Bonnie Coles for helping me in the examination and retrieval of the writings of Robert Oppenheimer at the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress (USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for the Theory and History of Science, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic

    Vincenzo Cioci

  2. Research Group on Physics Education and History of Physics, University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy

    Vincenzo Cioci

Authors
  1. Vincenzo Cioci

Corresponding author

Correspondence toVincenzo Cioci.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Lille 1 University Science and Technology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France

    Raffaele Pisano

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cioci, V. (2015). On the History and Technology of the Atomic Bomb. The Commitment of the Scientists. In: Pisano, R. (eds) A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9645-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp