Part of the book series:History of Mechanism and Machine Science ((HMMS,volume 27))
1443Accesses
2Citations
Abstract
Karl K. Darrow was a central actor in the reception of quantum theory in the Bell Telephone Laboratories. He was the first industrial physicist to dedicate his entire working time to the dissemination of novel concepts and theoretical tools by means of long review papers. The present paper analyzes the evolution of Darrow’s narratives of quantum theory and shows that Darrow’s reviews aimed at substantiating the view that physics was an evolutionary process. The paper argues that this view was connected to Darrow’s peculiar activity at the Bell Labs as well as to the contemporaneous attempts of leading American scientists to build an ideology of national science.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 17159
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Softcover Book
- JPY 21449
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 21449
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The present paper covers a period from the late 1910s to late 1930s. The AT&T Bell Telephone Laboratories were created only in 1925. Before that date, the personnel that would merge into the Bell Telephone Laboratories worked in the Engineering Department of the Western Electric Co., which was one of the member companies of the Bell System. For the sake of brevity, I will use the termBell Labs to refer to all the laboratories of the Bell System during the period under consideration.
- 2.
Unless otherwise reported, the biographical information contained in this section is taken from this interview.
- 3.
This expression was used by the interviewer W. J. King.
- 4.
The list of the topics of the first season clearly shows that the principal aim of the Colloquium was to engage with the development of quantum theory (“Meeting of the Colloquium”).
- 5.
Cartwright1987, p. 425.
- 6.
My interpretation of Darrow’s writings as a quest for the methodological unity of physics is analogous to the analysis philosopher of science Jordi Cat (1998) made of the debate between emergence and reductionism in physics as implicitly referring to two different models of unification.
- 7.
Dempster1926.
- 8.
Historian of science Mara Beller has convincingly argued that the success of Schrödinger’s approach was widespread and not limited to “the conservative quarterlies of the physics community” (Beller1983, p. 470).
- 9.
Van Vleck1929a, p. 485.
- 10.
Darrow’s description shares common elements with the idealized framework the historian of science John Pickstone (2000) has created about the ways in which scientists know nature and make artifacts.
References
Assmus A (1992a) The molecular tradition in early quantum theory. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Studies 22:209–231
Assmus A (1992b) The Americanization of molecular physics. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Studies 23:1–34
Beller M (1983) Matrix theory before Schrödinger: philosophy, problems, consequences. Isis 74:469–491
Beller M (1990) Born’s probabilistic interpretation: a case study of ‘Concepts in Flux’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21:563–588
Beller M (1997) ‘Against the stream’—Schrödinger’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28:421–432
Bitbol M (1996) Schrödinger’s philosophy of quantum mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Camilleri K (2009) Heisenberg and the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the physicist as philosopher. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cartwright N (1987) Philosophical problems of quantum theory: the response of American physicists. In: Krüger L, Gigerenzer G, Morgan M (eds) The probabilistic revolution, vol. 2: ideas in the sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 417–435
Cat J (1998) The physicists’ debates on unification in physics at the end of the 20th century. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28:253–300
Chang H (1995) The quantum counter-revolution: internal conflicts in scientific change. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26:121–136
Coben S (1971) The scientific establishment and the transmission of quantum mechanics to the United States, 1919–32. American Historical Review 76:442–460
Darrow KK (1917a) (Diary 1917) in: KDP (Box 6, Folder 14)
Darrow KK (1917b) (Letter to father and mother, 15 September). In: KDP (Box 2, Folder 25)
Darrow KK (1920a) (Letter to G. S. Gorton, 15 March). In: LHP (Box 2, Folder 30)
Darrow KK (1920b) (Letter to F. B. Jewett, 15 March). In: LHP (Box 2, Folder 30)
Darrow KK (1923) Contemporary advances in physics. Bell System Technical Journal 2:101–115
Darrow KK (1925) Contemporary advances in physics—VII waves and quanta. Bell System Technical Journal 4:280–326
Darrow KK (1926) Introduction to contemporary physics, 1st edn. Van Nostrand, New York
Darrow KK (1927) Contemporary advances in physics—XIV introduction of wave mechanics. BSTJ 6:653–701
Darrow KK (1930) Contemporary advances in physics—XIX fusion of wave and corpuscle theories. Bell System Technical Journal 9:163–188
Darrow KK (1934) Elementary notions of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 6:23–68
Darrow KK (1936) The renaissance of physics. MacMIllan, New York
Darrow KK (1964). Oral history interview by Henry Barton and W. J. King. AIP.http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4567_1.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2012
De Regt H (1997) Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and quantum theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28:461–481
Dempster AJ (1926) (Letter to K. K. Darrow, 27 July). In: KDP (Box 12, Folder 8)
First meeting of the Colloquium, season 1919–1920 on 20 October 1919. In: LHP (Box 2, Folder 30)
Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gertner J (2012) The idea factory: Bell Labs and the great age of American innovation. Penguin, New York
Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hacking I (1996) The disunities of the sciences. In: Galison P, Stump DJ (eds) The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 37–74
Harré R (1992) Bohr and Schrödinger. In Bitbol M, Darrigol O (eds) Erwin Schrödinger: philosophy and birth of quantum mechanics. Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, pp 143–50
Hoddeson L (1980) The entry of the quantum theory of solids into the Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1925–1940: a case-study of the industrial application of fundamental science. Minerva 38:422–447
Hoddeson L, Braun E, Teichmann J, Weart S (eds) (1992) Out of the crystal maze: chapters from the history of solid-state physics. Oxford University Press, New York
Holton G (1988) On the hesitant rise of quantum physics research in the United States. In: Holton G (ed) Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 147–187
Jähnert M, Lehner C (2015) The early debates about the interpretation of quantum mechanics. (In press)
Jammer M (1966) The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Jammer M (1974) The philosophy of quantum mechanics. Wiley, New York
Joas C, Lehner C (2009) The classical roots of wave mechanics: Schrödinger’s transformations of the optical-mechanical analogy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40:338–351
Kaiser D (2012) Booms, busts, and the world of ideas: enrollment pressures and the challenge of specialization. Osiris 27:276–302
Karl Darrow’s a genius: seven-year-old boy is a marvel of learning—he is writing a monster novel on the world’s fair. (1898 ca.). (Newspaper clip). In: KDP (Box 1, Folder 3)
KDP [Archival Collection Karl K. Darrow Papers], American Institute of Physics (AIP). Center for History of Physics. One Physics Ellipse College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
Kevles DJ (1971 [1995]) The physicists: the history of a scientific community in modern America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lalli R (2014) A new scientific journal takes the scene: the birth of Reviews of Modern Physics. Annalen der Physik 526:A83–A87
LHP [Archival Collection Lillian Hoddeson Papers], American Institute of Physics (AIP). Center for History of Physics. One Physics Ellipse College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
MacKinnon E (1980) The rise and fall of the Schrödinger interpretation. In Suppes P (ed) Studies in the foundations of quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing, pp 1–57
Meeting of the Colloquium during its first season 1919–1920. Attached to (Darrow 1920b)
Mehra J, Rechenberg H (1987) The historical development of quantum theory, vol 5, part 2, the creation of wave mechanics: early response and applications 1925–1926. Springer, Berlin
Miller AI (1984) Imagery and scientific thought: creating 20th-century physics. Birkhäuser, Boston
Millikan RA (1917) (Letter to K. K. Darrow, 6 September). In: KDP (Box 12, Folder 2)
Millman S (ed) (1983) History of engineering and science in the bell system. vol 4: physical sciences (1925–1980) Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill
Modern physical theories—time table. In: LHP (Box 2, Folder 30)
NBA [Niels Bohr Library & Archives], American Institute of Physics (AIP). Center for History of Physics. One Physics Ellipse College Park, Maryland 20740, USA
Pickstone JV (2000) Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Renn J (2013) Schrödinger and the genesis of wave mechanics. In Reiter WL, Yngvason J (eds) Erwin Schrödinger—50 years after. ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, European Mathematical Society Publishing House, Zürich.http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P437.PDF. Accessed 20 March 2013
Schrödinger E (1928) Collected papers on wave mechanics. Blackie & Son, London
Schweber SS (1986) The empiricist temper regnant: theoretical physics in the United States 1920–1950. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Science 17:55–98
Schweber SS (1990) The young John Clarke Slater and the development of quantum chemistry. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Science 20:339–406
Servos JW (1986) Mathematics and physical sciences in America, 1880–1930. Isis 77:611–629
Shapin S (2008) The scientific life: a moral history of a late modern vocation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sopka K (1988) Quantum physics in America: the years through 1935. American Institute of Physics, New York
Tobey R (1971) The American ideology of natural science, 1919–1930. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
Van Vleck JH (1929a) The new quantum mechanics. Chemical Review 5:467–507
Van Vleck JH (1929b) The statistical interpretation of various formulation of quantum mechanics. Journal of the Franklin Institute 207:475–498
Van Vleck JH (1967) Karl Kelchner Darrow—writer, councillor and secretary. Physics Today 20:23–26
Weart SR (1992) The solid community. In: Hoddeson L, Braun E, Teichmann J, Weart S (eds) Out of the crystal maze: chapters from the history of solid-state physics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 617–669
Weiner C (1973) How the transistor emerged. IEEE Spectrum 10:24–33
Wessels L (1983) Erwin Schrödinger and the descriptive tradition. In: Aris R, Davis HT, Stuewer RH (eds) Springs of scientific creativity: essay on founders of the modern science. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 254–278
White A (1976) Interview by L. Hoddeson. AIP.http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4960.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2013
Wooldridge D (1976). Interview by L. Hoddeson.http://www.aip.org/history/ohilist/4981.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2013
Acknowledgments
The archival research was supported by a grant-in-aid from the friends of the Center for the History of Physics, American Institute of Physics. I gratefully thank Marie Burks and Max Levis for the English revision of the paper and Cristopher Lehner for the useful discussions on Darrow’s interpretation of wave mechanics. I am also grateful to Peter Galison, Michael Gordin, Gerald Holton and the other participants of the Phunday 2013 workshop where I presented a previous version of the paper. I especially thank David Kaiser, Skúli Sigurdsson and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany
Roberto Lalli
- Roberto Lalli
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toRoberto Lalli.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Department of Physics, Lille 1 University Science and Technology, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
Raffaele Pisano
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lalli, R. (2015). ‘The Renaissance of Physics’: Karl K. Darrow (1891–1982) and the Dissemination of Quantum Theory at the Bell Telephone Laboratories. In: Pisano, R. (eds) A Bridge between Conceptual Frameworks. History of Mechanism and Machine Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9645-3_14
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN:978-94-017-9644-6
Online ISBN:978-94-017-9645-3
eBook Packages:EngineeringEngineering (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative