Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Security, Legitimacy, and State-Building in Contemporary Iraq: International and Regional Intervention in the Case of Sinjar (Shingal)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the interplay between security, legitimacy, and state-building in contemporary Iraq, emphasising the dual nature of intervention by international and regional state and non-state actors. Focusing on the post-2003 Iraq War period, it explores how international actors, particularly the United States, and regional actors, like Iran and Turkey, have shaped Iraq’s political and security dynamics. Initially viewed as opportunities for state-building by the Shi’a and the Kurds, these interventions shifted to consensus and also transitioned from direct interference to strategic alignments with local actors, further complicating governance. Central to the analysis are Iraq’s disputed territories, such as Sinjar (Shingal), which serve as arenas where state sovereignty and legitimacy are intensely contested. On the regional level, non-state actors like the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) also operate within these territories, undermining Iraq’s state-building efforts. The PMF’s alignment with Iranian strategies and the PKK’s ambitions to control border territories reflect broader trends of external/regional players exploiting local grievances to project influence. These dynamics challenge Iraq’s fragile sovereignty and highlight the importance of the army cohesion as a vital institution for Iraq's state-building process. The chapter’s core argument is that Iraq’s challenges are not solely the result of external interventions but also deeply rooted in regional interferences by both state and non-state actors affected, in turn, by internal divisions among Shi’a, Sunni, and the Kurds. The inability to forge a cohesive state identity has perpetuated fragmentation, enabling external powers to exploit these divisions. This study, building on the book's core argument, critiques the liberal state-building approach, which prioritises institutional frameworks without addressing socio-political disunity. Concluding, the chapter calls for a rethinking of Iraq’s state-building strategies, emphasising the need for internal consensus and inclusive governance as prerequisites for stability. It argues that Iraq’s future hinges on addressing its internal fragmentation while mitigating the destabilising effects of international and regional interference. Ongoing issues of legitimacy—as these are reflected in the current constitution—continue to shape Iraq’s main challenges and demonstrate the lack of continuity today, more than the intervention in itself.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Normally non state actors such as military companies are often acquired a status that scholarly work has described as hybrid sovereignty. However, this is more related in the case of Iraq for instance to the absence of law than necessarily to the claim of sovereignty” (Srivatava,2022: 2).

References

  • Ahmed, Z. (2024).The Foundation of Regional and International Relations of the KRI [] Al-Tafseer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaaldin, R. (2018). “How Will Iraq Contain Iran’s Proxies?”.The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Araji, Q. (2024). “Iraqi PM Advisor: Al-Sudani’s Visit to US will Establish New Era of Relations Between the Two Countries”.Shafaq News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hakim, A. (2023). “A Policy Debate with Ammar Al-Hakim on State-Building in Iraq”.MERI.https://www.meri-k.org/publication/the-political-system-and-state-building-in-iraq-a/.

  • Al-Rahim, R. (2023). “A Year of Mixed Results for Iraq’s Sudani”.Arab Center Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L, and D. S. Zawity. (2024). “The Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) as Foreign Policy (Non-State) Actor in Iraq,” inNon-State Actors and Foreign Policy Agency: Insights from Area Studies, ed. M. Charountaki, C. Kourterlis and D. Irrera. Springer, pp. 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, A. (2012).Foreign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barzani, N. (2023). “Institutionalisation of Federal-Regional Relations: A Process Long Overdue”.MERI.https://www.meri-k.org/multimedia/institutionalisation-of-federal-regional-relations-a-process-long-overdue/.

  • Bruce W. Jentleson and Larry Berman (eds) (1995):Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted Conflict , NewYork, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charountaki, M. (2011) The Kurds and US foreign policy:International Relations in the Middle East since 1945.Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charountaki, M. (2018). “The Kurdish Referendum.”Harvard International Review.https://hir.harvard.edu/the-kurdishreferendum-the-aftermath-and-historic-connotations/

  • Charountaki, M. (2023). “Discontinuities in Greece’s Middle Eastern Foreign Policy Practice”.International Politics, vol. 60, 1071–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2018). “The Kurdish Referendum”.Harvard International Review.https://hir.harvard.edu/the-kurdish-referendum-the-aftermath-and-historic-connotations/.

  • Clive, N. (1995). “Book Review: The Politics of Intervenor and Client, Foreign Military Intervention: The Dynamics of Protracted Conflict”.Government and Opposition, vol. 30, no. 4, 563–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirates Policy Center. (2024). “Turkish-Iraqi Agreement: Security in Exchange for Trade, Water”.Turkey Studies Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, E., and D. Ollivant. (2020). “U.S.–Iran Proxy Competition in Iraq”.New America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, H. and K. Khaddour. (2021). “The Making of the Kurdish Frontier: Power, Conflict, and Governance in the Iraqi-Syrian Borderlands”.Carnegie Middle East Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, B. (2010).The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, S. (2011). “The Coming Turkish-Iranian Competition in Iraq”.United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaválek, T. (2017). “Competing Interests in Shingal District: Examining the PKK-Linked Structures, Defusing Tensions”.Middle East Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurda, D. (2024). “Energy Issues Center of Discussions During Sudani Visit to Washington: US Official”.Rudaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2016).The Statebuilder’s Dilemma: On the Limits of Foreign Intervention. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, F. Stephen and Alireza Nader. (2013).Turkish-Iranian Relations in a Changing Middle East. RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. P. (December 2002). “Economic Priorities of the National Security Strategy”.US Foreign Policy Agenda, vol. 7, no. 4,https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA431751.pdf.

  • Lindenstrauss, G. (2018). “Turkey and Iran: Two Regional Powers and the Relations Pendulum,” inIran in a Changing Strategic Environment, ed. M. Litvak, E. B. Landau, and E. Kam. Institute for National Security Studies, pp. 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macron, E. (2024). “Europe in Mortal Danger: An Interview with Emmanuel Macron”.The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeary, P. (2018). “America Quietly Starts Nation-Building in Parts of Syria”. The Atlantic Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylroie, L. (2024). “U.S. Encourages Better Ties Between Baghdad and Erbil, including Resumption of KRG Oil Exports”.Kurdistan 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompeo, M. R. (2018). “On Sanctioning Those Involved in Killing Protestors and Corruption in Iraq”.US State Department.https://2017-2021.state.gov/on-sanctioning-those-involved-in-killing-protestors-and-corruption-in-iraq/.

  • Powell, C. L. (13 June 2004). “Interview on NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert”.US Department of State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rached, K. (2022). “Financing of Non-State Armed Groups in the Middle East: Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) as a Case Study”.Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, [online], 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggio, B. (2017). “Iraqi Troops, Iranian-Backed Militias Eject Islamic State from Hawija”.Long War Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudaw. (2024). “Turkey to ‘Secure’ Iraq Border in the Summer, says Erdogan”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitka, T. (2016).International Intervention, Identity and Conflict Transformation: Bridges and Walls between Groups. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. (2022).Hybrid Sovereignty in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Talabani, Q., Erbil, December 2017. Interview by M.Charountaki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicher, H. and G. R. Teicher. (1993).Twin Pillars to Desert Storm: America’s Flawed Vision in the Middle East from Nixon to Bush. Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wali, Z. Z. (2020). “PM Kadhimi Calls PMF a ‘Force of the Homeland’ amid Paramilitary Network’s Internal Schisms”.Rudaw.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Al-Matrouhi, S. K., Commander of Popular Mobilisation Forces operations in Nineveh. Mosul, May 2023. Interview by D. Zawity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. [high level Security Forces Officer of the KRG]. Shingal (Duhok) November 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzani, M., Former KRI President. Erbil, December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, H., Military Advisor KRI Presidency. Erbil, December 2021. Interview by M. Charountaki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalın, İ., Chief Counselor to the President of Türkiye. Ankara, April 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohajerani, Ata’ollah., Former Iranian Minister. London, October 2013. Interview by M. Charountaki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, J. S., Deputy KRI President. Erbil, May 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, N. A., Major General, Commander of Unit 80. Erbil, May 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––––. Erbil, December 2017. Interview by M. Charountaki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talabani, Q., Deputy KRG PM. Erbil, November 2022. Interview by D. Zawity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––––. Erbil, December 2017. Interview by M.Charountaki.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Marianna Charountaki

  2. American University of Kurdistan-Duhok (AUK), Duhok, Iraq

    Dirwar Sadiq Zawity

Authors
  1. Marianna Charountaki
  2. Dirwar Sadiq Zawity

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMarianna Charountaki.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lincoln, UK

    Marianna Charountaki

  2. Leicester, UK

    James R. Moore

  3. Dayton, OH, USA

    Liam Anderson

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Charountaki, M., Zawity, D.S. (2025). Security, Legitimacy, and State-Building in Contemporary Iraq: International and Regional Intervention in the Case of Sinjar (Shingal). In: Charountaki, M., R. Moore, J., Anderson, L. (eds) A Century of State-Making in Iraq. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76029-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp