Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Morality, or Schopenhauer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 76Accesses

Abstract

Modern science dethroned philosophy from answering the reality question; Enlightenment dethroned it from answering the meaning question. For Enlightenment declared the meaning question to exceed the powers of our reason. Morality or the norms of our behavior seemed to be left as the genuine subject of philosophy. Yet what is left of morality if we lack free will that makes us responsible?

We must still take account of the empirical fact that we do recognize principles that people agree are moral. Such is the double imperative, pointed to by Schopenhauer, that we should not harm anyone and help everyone, as far as we can. We can also show that some animals obey similar moral norms. Such demonstrations, though, belong to empirical science. There is still the non-empirical question of why we should go on obeying principles that we seem to have inherited from our animal ancestors. When we look for norms to justify obeying morality, we must distinguish, I argue, between moral and metaphysical norms, or morality and practical metaphysics. For if the grounds for obeying moral norms are again moral norms, we can repeat the question for the reasons to obeymoral norms.

Unlike moral norms, metaphysical norms refer to ideas of the meaning of the world. Though moral norms can be justified only by metaphysical ones, metaphysical norms cannot override moral ones. Moral norms invalidate metaphysical norms that contradict them because if the latter were valid, following them would end up in destroying the life that morality commands us to protect and that metaphysics and religion want to find a meaning for. Thus, we can understand philosophy’s interest in morality as a consequence of its basic meaning question; philosophy’s interest proves to be that of setting limits to metaphysical norms.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 4003
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 5004
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Literature

  • Habermas, Jürgen. “Genetische Sklavenherrschaft? Moralische Grenzen reproduktionsmedizinischer Fortschritte”.Die postnationale Konstellation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Hans. “Gnosis and Modern Nihilism”, Social Research 19.Das Prinzip VerantwortungVersuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Max.Preußen und die katholische Kirche seit 1640. 2. Theil 1740–1747. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1881

    Google Scholar 

  • Pals, Daniel.Nine Theories of Religion, New York: Oxford UP 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargament, Kenneth.The Psychology of Religion and Coping. Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford Pr. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, tr. E.F.G. Payne, New York: Hafner.Preisschrift über die Grundlage der Moral (1841), inWerke in zehn Bänden, Band VI, Zürich 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg.,Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink 2003, 289–302

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Frans.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg (2013). Obtained July 30, 2023

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Ulrich Steinvorth

Authors
  1. Ulrich Steinvorth

Corresponding author

Correspondence toUlrich Steinvorth.

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steinvorth, U. (2024). Morality, or Schopenhauer. In: A Brief Presentation of Philosophy and Its History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72533-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 4003
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 5004
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp