76Accesses
Abstract
Modern science dethroned philosophy from answering the reality question; Enlightenment dethroned it from answering the meaning question. For Enlightenment declared the meaning question to exceed the powers of our reason. Morality or the norms of our behavior seemed to be left as the genuine subject of philosophy. Yet what is left of morality if we lack free will that makes us responsible?
We must still take account of the empirical fact that we do recognize principles that people agree are moral. Such is the double imperative, pointed to by Schopenhauer, that we should not harm anyone and help everyone, as far as we can. We can also show that some animals obey similar moral norms. Such demonstrations, though, belong to empirical science. There is still the non-empirical question of why we should go on obeying principles that we seem to have inherited from our animal ancestors. When we look for norms to justify obeying morality, we must distinguish, I argue, between moral and metaphysical norms, or morality and practical metaphysics. For if the grounds for obeying moral norms are again moral norms, we can repeat the question for the reasons to obeymoral norms.
Unlike moral norms, metaphysical norms refer to ideas of the meaning of the world. Though moral norms can be justified only by metaphysical ones, metaphysical norms cannot override moral ones. Moral norms invalidate metaphysical norms that contradict them because if the latter were valid, following them would end up in destroying the life that morality commands us to protect and that metaphysics and religion want to find a meaning for. Thus, we can understand philosophy’s interest in morality as a consequence of its basic meaning question; philosophy’s interest proves to be that of setting limits to metaphysical norms.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 4003
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 5004
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Habermas, Jürgen. “Genetische Sklavenherrschaft? Moralische Grenzen reproduktionsmedizinischer Fortschritte”.Die postnationale Konstellation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 243–247
Jonas, Hans. “Gnosis and Modern Nihilism”, Social Research 19.Das Prinzip Verantwortung—Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1979
Lehmann, Max.Preußen und die katholische Kirche seit 1640. 2. Theil 1740–1747. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1881
Pals, Daniel.Nine Theories of Religion, New York: Oxford UP 2015
Pargament, Kenneth.The Psychology of Religion and Coping. Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford Pr. 1997
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, tr. E.F.G. Payne, New York: Hafner.Preisschrift über die Grundlage der Moral (1841), inWerke in zehn Bänden, Band VI, Zürich 1977
Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg.,Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink 2003, 289–302
de Waal, Frans.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg (2013). Obtained July 30, 2023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Ulrich Steinvorth
- Ulrich Steinvorth
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toUlrich Steinvorth.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinvorth, U. (2024). Morality, or Schopenhauer. In: A Brief Presentation of Philosophy and Its History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72533-3_7
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-72532-6
Online ISBN:978-3-031-72533-3
eBook Packages:Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative