79Accesses
Abstract
Physicalism was unable to disqualify belief in free will because we seem to be able to reject inclinations if we deliberate them. This reasoning was first used by Aristotle and the Stoics to claim that adults capable of deliberation are responsible for actions they might have deliberated. The Stoics distinguished between understanding a thought and approving or rejecting it, and claimed that by our power of saying yes or no to a thought theego becomes independent even of Zeus. Yet they shrank back from identifying this power with free will, as did Augustine. Descartes and Kant follow the same idea of judging as the Stoics, but Kant argues that the power of negation, which is the liberty of indifference, is not yet free will, claiming that we get the idea of free will only in our experience that there is a moral law demanding obedience that presupposes not only our power of negation but a power to positively obey morality.
This seems implausible. For when we learn as children to deny and defy the commands of our parents, we learn to positively make up our mind and to positively obey or disobey morality. Hence, we should recognize the power of negation or liberty of indifference as the free will that morality presupposes. It is empirical and fits in with our everyday use of the concept of free will.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 4003
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 5004
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Austin, John L.How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge/Mass. 1962
Bobzien, Susanne.Determinism, Freedom, and Moral Responsibility. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: OUP 2021
Bühler, Karl.Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes. Jena: Fischer 1918
Bühler, Karl. Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes. Jena: Fischer.Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer 1934
Chomsky, Noam. “A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior”.Language 35, 1959, pp. 26–58.
Descartes, René.Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies, Cambridge: Cambridge UP, tr. Cottingham, 1996
Epictetus, Discourses. Tr. George Long. New York: Appleton 1904
Frede, Michael. Essays in Ancient Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Ed. A. A. Long. Oakland: Univ. of California Pr. 2011
Frege, Gottlob. “Sinn und Bedeutung”. “Der Gedanke” (1919). InLogische Untersuchungen. Ed. G. Patzig. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck 1966, 30–53
Görler, Woldemar. “Asthenês synkatathesis: Zur stoischen Erkenntnistheorie”.Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, N.F. 3; 1977, 83–92. Reprint inKleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie; ed. C. Catrein, Philosophia antiqua 95, Leiden/Boston 2004: 1–15
Kant, Immanuel. n.d.Gesammelte Werke. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1900ff
Kant, Immanuel.Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and tr. Allen W. Wood, Yale UP, Wood 2002
Kant, Immanuel.The Metaphysics of Morals, tr. Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge UP 1991
Popper, Karl.Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon 1972,
Skinner, B.F.Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1957
Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg., Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink.A Secular Absolute. How Modern Philosophy Discovered Authenticity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Ulrich Steinvorth
- Ulrich Steinvorth
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toUlrich Steinvorth.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinvorth, U. (2024). Propositional Language and the Power of Negation, or Kant and Descartes. In: A Brief Presentation of Philosophy and Its History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72533-3_6
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-72532-6
Online ISBN:978-3-031-72533-3
eBook Packages:Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative