76Accesses
Abstract
Plotinus’ theology anticipates Darwin’s theory of evolution, though it reverses Darwin’s development from the simple to the complex. Doesn’t it anticipate modern science? It does presuppose a divine origin but that doesn’t make it unscientific. For though modern science contributed to the disenchantment of the world, it wouldn’t have arisen without Plato conceiving being as perfect and divine. Nor is it unscientific because Plotinusvalues evolution, preferring the complex. Modern biologists, too, consider the complex higher than the primitive, though Darwin forbad himself to think of the more complex as higher.
The reason we cannot accept Plotinus’ theory as science is not that he finds meaning in nature but that he understands meaning as something imposed by a (divine) mind on meaningless facts. He doesn’t allow things and facts to beimmanently meaningful. But a sunset, say, may be meaningful without implying that behind it there is a mind that intends us to understand the meaning of the event. True, sometimes there is a mind behind something meaningful for us, say someone who wants us to understand a smile as the sign of happiness. But such an intention is possible only because certain movements and gestures have meaning for us regardless of someone’s intention.
Science understands the meaning that it does discover, such as the natural evolution, like a sunset or an unintended smile. It takes any meaning it finds in nature for immanent, not for transcendent and a proof of the existence of a creator god who imposed his meaning on the world, as did Plotinus. Science doesn’t deny that we might look for a transcendent meaning, but distinguishes itself from such an enterprise, which we may call theology, by limiting itself to immanent meaning. It is important to stick to immanent meaning. Otherwise, science would be theology.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 4003
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 5004
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Camus, Albert.L’homme révolté. Paris: Gallimard 1951
Chadwick, Henry.Augustine: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford UP 1986/2001.
Dawkins, Richard.Science in the Soul: Selected Writing of a Passionate Rationalist. London: Bantam 2017
Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar. “Leibniz, Plato, Plotinus.” In Karfík, Filip and Euree Song, eds.,Plato Revived. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge and Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1748). New York: Hafner 1948
Lovejoy, Arthur Oncken.The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge: Harvard UP 1936
Mayr, Ernst.The Growth of Biological Thought. Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge/MA: Harvard UP 1982
Mayr, Ernst. The Growth of Biological Thought. Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge/MA: Harvard UP.One Long Argument. Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge/MA: Harvard UP 1991
Moore, G.E.Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge UP (1903), 1962
Smart, J.J.C., and Haldane, John.Atheism and Theism, Oxford: Blackwell 2003
Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg., Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink.The Metaphysics of Modernity, Milwaukee: Marquette UP 2013
Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg., Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink.A Secular Absolute. How Modern Philosophy Discovered Authenticity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2020
Summerell, O. F. “Self-Causality from Plotinus to Eckhart and from Descartes to Kant”.Quaestio 2, 2002, 493–518
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. In Schriften. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1933, ed. A. Ambrose. Oxford: Blackwell 1979
Wladika, Michael. “Aspects of Hegel’s Interpretation of Plotinus”.Hegel-Jahrbuch 2015, 124–131
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Ulrich Steinvorth
- Ulrich Steinvorth
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toUlrich Steinvorth.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinvorth, U. (2024). Plotinus, or the Meaning of the Meaning Question. In: A Brief Presentation of Philosophy and Its History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72533-3_4
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-72532-6
Online ISBN:978-3-031-72533-3
eBook Packages:Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative