81Accesses
Abstract
Max Weber, one of the founders of sociology, is known for his ban on evaluation from the social sciences. I argue that despite or even because of his ban, Weber finds a way for sociology to evaluate the development of civilizations. He does so by investigating technical progress, which must be purely descriptive, and by using the fact that technical progress can be “entangled” with progress in a normative sense, or with increased value, to state that there is progress in a normative sense. As I understand Weber, although he doesn’t say so himself, technical progress entangles increase of value if it is pursued by actions loved for their own sake. For Weber assumes, as I think most people do, that if we do something for its own sake orautotelically, then there is value in the action.
Thus, Weber provides an acceptance condition for claims on the meaning of the world: that it requires technical progress in value spheres that must be produced by autotelic actions. Yet it seems he must use two criteria to evaluate societies: how many value spheres there are in a society, and how much autonomy a value sphere has in pursuing its values.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 4003
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 5004
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature
Durkheim, Emile.De la division du travail social. Paris: Alcan, 1893
Kipling, Rudyard. “The White Man’s Burden”. London Times, 4.2.1899,New York Tribune undThe Sun 5.2. 1899
Steinvorth, Ulrich. “Zur Legitimität des Klonens.” In Ludger Schwarte, Hg., Körper und Recht: anthropologische Dimensionen der Rechtsphilosophie. München: Fink.Unterdrückung durch Beglückung. Eine liberale Revision der politischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner 2023
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. (1905). Translated by Parsons in 1930. Reedited by Routledge, London 2001;https://selforganizedseminar.wordpress.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/07/weber_protestant_ethic.pdf
Weber, Max. Economic Ethics of World Religions (1920), ed. G. Roth and C. Wittich: University of California Pr 1978
Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1922). Tübingen: Mohr 1980 (abbr. WG)
Weber, Max. Economy and Society, ed. and tr. Keith Tribe, Cambridge/MA: Harvard UP 2019 (abbr. ES)
Weber, Max. Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences, tr. and ed. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe/Ill.: Free Press 1949
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Ulrich Steinvorth
- Ulrich Steinvorth
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toUlrich Steinvorth.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinvorth, U. (2024). Progress, or Weber. In: A Brief Presentation of Philosophy and Its History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72533-3_10
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-031-72532-6
Online ISBN:978-3-031-72533-3
eBook Packages:Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative