Part of the book series:Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe ((MOMEIDSEE))
182Accesses
Abstract
This chapter provides a brief history of the genocide and the period up to the establishment of the Turkish Republic. It first discusses the status and conditions of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, and then focuses on the anti-Armenian actions and policies that led to the mass destructions, arrests and killings from 1915 to 1923.
The importance of Kurdish tribes or theHamidiye cavalry for today is explained, as Kurdish public figures, intelligentsia or politicians, have become significant actors in pushing Turkey to come to terms with its past.
This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime
Buy Now
- Chapter
- JPY 3498
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- eBook
- JPY 8579
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
- Hardcover Book
- JPY 10724
- Price includes VAT (Japan)
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
- 1.
According to research conducted by the University of Minnesota’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, there were 2,133,190 Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1914, declining to 387,800 by 1922. For detailed information on the non-Muslim population of the Ottoman Empire, see Braude and Lewis (1982) and Karpat (1982).
- 2.
The millet system was created by the Pact of Umar in the seventh century to organize and protect distinct religious communities in exchange for payment of a tax, orcizye. The millets communicated with Ottoman authorities through intermediaries but retained the ability to self-regulate internal matters. Though there were three main millets, Greek, Jewish and Armenian, these groups were internally diverse and incorporated smaller minorities. The millet system by the end of the nineteenth century included a ‘Greek’ Orthodox (Chalcedonian) millet, an Armenian Apostolic millet (non-Chaldean Christians), an Armenian Catholic millet, an Armenian Protestant millet and a Jewish millet, all representing what were increasingly understood as ethno-national entities. For more on the millet system, see Kemal Karpat (1982); Barkey and Gavrilis (2016).
- 3.
Some of them being: Nahapet Rusinian, Dr. Servichen, Dran Nazariantz, Nigogayos Balyan, Krikor Odian, Krikor Margosian
- 4.
On the gathering decline of the Ottomans, see J. J. Reid (1994)Crisis of the Ottoman Empire (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner); A. Palmer (1994)The Decline and Fall of the Ottoman Empire (New York, NY: M. Evans); H. Inalcik (2000)The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300–1600 (London: Phoenix) and D. Goffman (2002)The Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
- 5.
See E. J. Erickson (2013)Ottomans and Armenians (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan) for Armenian revolutionary movements between 1878 and 1915.
- 6.
Dashnak has been a full member of the Socialist International since 2003 and has affiliates in more than 20 countries.
- 7.
See Ely B. Soane’s travel notes on the massacres and vandalism in Diyarbakir in 1895 in E. B. Soane (1912)Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in Disguise: With historical notices of the Kurdish tribes and Chaldeans of Kurdistan (London: J. Murray).
- 8.
On the Hamidiye Cavalry, see Martin van Bruinessen (1992)Kurdish Society, Ethnicity, and Refugee Problems, in P. G. Kreyenboek and S. Sperl (eds)The Kurds: A Contemporary Overview (London: Routledge); J. Klein (2007)Kurdish Nationalists and Non-nationalist Kurdists: Rethinking Minority Nationalism and the Dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, 1908–1909,Nations and Nationalism 13(1): 135–153; S. Deringil (2009)The Armenian Question Is Finally Closed: Mass Conversions of Armenians in Anatolia During the Hamidian Massacres, 1895–1897,Comparative Studies in Society and History 51(2), 344–371.
- 9.
For more on the abandoned properties, see N. Onaran (2000)Emval-I Metruke Olayı: Osmanlı’da ve Cumhuriyette Ermeni ve Rum Mallarının Türkleştirilmesi [Abandoned Properties: The Turkification of Armenian and Greek Properties Under the Ottoman and Republican States], Istanbul: Belge.
- 10.
Taner Akcam, in his book titledA Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility, analyzes the discussion which took place in the parliament in 1918 and analyzes the details of the trials of crime suspects.
- 11.
‘Operation Nemesis’ was a covert operation and assassination campaign by the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaksutyun) carried out between 1920 and 1922. A number of former Ottoman political and military figures were assassinated for their roles in the Armenian Genocide. For more, see Eric Bogosian’sOperation Nemesis: The Assassination Plot that Avenged the Armenian Genocide (2015); Edward Alexander’sA Crime of Vengeance (2000).
- 12.
Ali Naci Karacan, Ali (1896–1955), a Turkish journalist and publisher who participated in the Treaty of Lausanne, was the Switzerland press attaché for a long time (1935–48), wrote a book titledLozan Konferansı ve İsmet pașa (1943) on the Conference of Lausanne and İsmet İnönü, second president of Turkey. Also see, ‘Ali Naci Karacan’in Gözüyle Lozan Konferansı ve İsmet Paşa’ (Conference of Lausanne and Ismet Pasha from the Eyes of Ali Naci Karacan) by Fatih Tuğluoğlu (2013),Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkilap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu dergisi, 53: 285–328.
- 13.
The coverage of non-Muslim minorities in the treaty was restricted to just Armenians, Jews and Orthodox Greeks, leaving out other non-Muslim groups, including Assyrians, Chaldeans, Catholics and Protestants. These groups’ rights and demands are either ignored or they consist of being allowed to practice their own religion without having been officially granted cultural, educational and religious institutions. See N. Kaya (2009)Forgotten or Assimilated? Minorities in the Education System of Turkey, London: Minority Rights Group.
Bibliography
Akçam, T. (2006).A shameful act: The Armenian genocide and the question of Turkish responsibility. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Aktar, A. (1998). Homogenizing the nation; Turkifying the economy. InConference on the compulsory exchange of populations between Greece and Turkey. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Arkun, A. (2005). Into the modern age 1800–1913. In E. Herzig & M. Kurkchiyan (Eds.),Armenians: Past and present in the making of national identity (pp. 65–88). London/New York: Routledge.
Astourian, S. H. (2011). The silence of the land: Agrarian relations, ethnicity, and power. In R. G. Suny et al. (Eds.),A question of genocide: Armenians and Turks at the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. 55–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barkey, K., & Gavrilis, G. (2016). The Ottoman millet system: Non-territorial autonomy and its contemporary legacy.Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 24–42.
Bloxham, D. (2011). The first world war and the development of the Armenian genocide. In R. G. Suny et al. (Eds.),A question of genocide: Armenians and Turks at the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. 260–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braude, B. (1982). Introduction. In B. Braude (Ed.),Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire (pp. 1–5). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Braude, B., & Lewis, B. (1982).Christian and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society. New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.
Dadrian, V. N. (1997).The history of the Armenian genocide: Ethnic conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. New York: Berghahn Books.
Derderian, K. (2005). Common fate, different experience: Gender-specific aspects of the Armenian genocide 1915–1917.Holocaust Genocide Studies, 19(1), 1–25.
Ekmekçioğlu, L. (2016).Recovering Armenia: The limits of belonging in post-genocide Turkey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gocek, F. M. (2011). Introduction: Leaving it to the historians. In R. G. Suny et al. (Eds.),A question of genocide: Armenians and Turks at the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karakoç, E. (2010). Osmanlı Hariciyesinde Bir Ermeni Nazır: Gabriyel Noradunkyan Efendi [An Armenian minister in Ottoman foreign relations: Gabriyel Noradunkyan].Uluslar Arası İlişkiler, VII(25), 157–177.
Karpat, K. H. (1982). Millets and nationality: The roots of the incongruity of nation and state in the post-Ottoman era. In B. Braude & B. Lewis (Eds.),Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire (pp. 142–169). New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.
Klein, J. (2011).The margins of empire: Kurdish militias in the Ottoman tribal zone. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lewis, B. (1968).The emergence of modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mann, M. (2005).The dark side of democracy: Explaining ethnic cleansing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marashlian, L. (1998). Finishing the genocide: Cleansing Turkey of Armenian survivors, 1920–1923. In R. Hovannisian (Ed.),Remembrance and denial: The case of the Armenian genocide (pp. 113–145). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Moses, A. D. (2008).Empire, colony, genocide: Conquest, occupation, and subaltern resistance in world history. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Naimark, N. N. (2002).Fires of hatred: Ethnic cleansing in twentieth-century Europe. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Naimark, N. M. (2011). Preface. In R. G. Suny et al. (Eds.),A question of genocide: Armenians and Turks at the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. xiii–xx). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pamukciyan, K. (2003).Ermeni Kaynaklarından Tarihe Katkılar [Contributions to history from Armenian sources]. Aras: Istanbul.
Panossian, R. (2002). The past as nation: Three dimensions of Armenian identity.Geopolitics, 7(2), 121–146.
Somer, M. (2010). Media values and democratization: What unites and what divides religious-conservative and pro-secular elites.Turkish Studies, 11(4), 555–577.
Suny, R. G. (2009). Truth in telling: Reconciling realities in the genocide of the Ottoman Armenians.American Historical Review, 114(4), 930–946.
Suny, R. G. (2011). Writing genocide: The fate of the Ottoman Armenians in Western historiographies. In R. G. Suny et al. (Eds.),A question of genocide: Armenians and Turks at the end of the Ottoman Empire (pp. 15–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tachjian, V. (2009). Gender, nationalism, exclusion: The reintegration process of female survivors of the Armenian genocide.Nations and Nationalism, 15(1), 60–80.
Van Bruinessen, M. (2000).Mullas, sufis and heretics: The role of religion in Kurdish society. Collected articles. Istanbul: The Isis Press.
Wiesenthal, A. (2017).The Sultan-Caliph and the Heroes of Liberty: Heroism, Revolution, and the contestation of public persona in the late Ottoman Empire, c. 1900–1918. Unpublished MA thesis. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
Yumul, A., & Bali, R. N. (2009). Ermeni ve Yahudi Cemaatlerinde Siyasal Düşünceler [Political thought in Armenian and Jewish societies].Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce, 362–366.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
The School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Özlem Belçim Galip
- Özlem Belçim Galip
Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toÖzlem Belçim Galip.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galip, Ö.B. (2020). Revisiting Armenians in the Ottoman Empire: Deportations and Atrocities. In: New Social Movements and the Armenian Question in Turkey. Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59400-8_2
Download citation
Published:
Publisher Name:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN:978-3-030-59399-5
Online ISBN:978-3-030-59400-8
eBook Packages:HistoryHistory (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative