Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cultural Ecosystem Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The chapter provides the analysis and assessment ofthree cultural ES:C1, Recreation and Tourism: Physical Use of Nature and Landscape; C2, Landscape Aesthetics: Aesthetic Values; andC3, Natural and Cultural Heritage: Intellectual and Scientific Values. All ES are described in the unified structure: definition and brief characteristics, methods used for identification and assessment, main types of landscape and ecosystems providing given ES, the importance of ES in terms of nature and landscape protection and ES assessment for the territory of Slovakia. Spatial assessment is provided as a map of the landscape capacity for a given ES provision. For all ES, short conclusions and overview of input data for further assessment of the ES capacity, demand and flow are also given.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aplin, G. (2002).Heritage: Identification, conservation, and management. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barčáková, I. (2001). Prístupy k hodnoteniu estetickej (vizuálnej) kvality krajiny.Geografický časopis, 53, 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, J. N., Austen, M. C., Atkins, J. P., Burdon, D., Degraer, S., Dentinho, T. P., DErous, S., Holm, P., Horton, T., Van Ierland, E., Marboe, A. H., Starkey, D. J., Townsend, M., & Zarzycki, T. (2007). Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: Implications for the ecosystem approach.Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54(3), 253–265.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003.

    Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Jurado, G., Philipsen, C., & Kleeschulte, S. (2016).Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their Services in Luxembourg – Assessment results. Luxembourg: Le Gouvernment du Grand -Duché de Luxemburg.https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4924.5841.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units.Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (1994). Conceptualizing smoothness and density as landscape elements in visual resource management.Landscape and Urban Planning, 30(1–2), 49–58.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90066-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., & Müller, F. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification.Landscape Online, 34, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, L. H., & Dukes, S. J. (2007). Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services. In V. Nentwig (Ed.),Biological invasions (pp. 217–237). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czepczynski, M. (2008).Cultural landscapes of post-socialist cities: Representation of powers and needs. Aldershot-Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century.Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 267–281.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., Gret-regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R. G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J., & Von Der Dunk, A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812–8819.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109.

  • Drdoš, J. (1995). Krajinný obraz a jeho hodnotenie.Životné prostredie, 29(4), 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S., Costanza, R., Childers, D. L., Erickson, J., Gross, K., Grove, M., Hopkinson, C. S., Kahn, J., Pincetl, S., Troy, A., Warren, P., & Wilson, M. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management.BioScience, 56(2), 121–133.https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making.Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. V., & Lorencová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic.Ecosystem Services, 8, 110–117.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fűzyová, Ľ., Lániková, D., & Novorolský, M. (2009). Economic valuation of Tatras national park and regional environmental policy.Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 18(5), 811–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, W. (1993).The power of place: How our surroundings shape our thoughts, emotions, and actions. New York: Poseidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzner, M. (2009).Economic and cultural values related to protected areas. Part A: Valuation of ecosystem services in Tatra (PL) and Slovensky Raj (SK) national parks. Final report.http://www.minzp.sk/files/sekcia-ochranyprirodyakrajiny/ps-543/final-report-part-b-pl-sk_getzner_201003.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2019.

  • Giglio, S., Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., & Pantano, P. (2019). Using social media to identify tourism attractiveness in six Italian cities.Tourism Management, 72, 306–312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Koop, G. (2002). Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: Climbing in Scotland.Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(3), 449–466.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016077425039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hølleland, H., Skrede, J., & Holmgaard, B. S. (2017). Cultural heritage and ecosystem services: A literature review.Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 19(3), 210–237.https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2017.1342069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrnčiarová, T. (2004). Prírodné a kultúrne aspekty krajiny a jej potenciál.Životné Prostredie, 38(2), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrnčiarová, T., Kenderessy, P., Špulerová, J., Vlachovičová, M., Piscová, V., & Dobrovodská, M. (2018). Status and outlook of hiking trails in the central part of the low Tatra Mountains in Slovakia between 1980–1981 and 2013–2014.Journal of Mountain Science, 15, 1615–1632.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4690-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakab, I., & Petluš, P. (2013). The use of viewshed analysis in creation of maps of potential visual exposure. InGIS Ostrava 2013 – Geoinformatics for city transformation. Ostrava: VSB Technical University Ostrava, Faculty of mining and geology, Institute of Geoinformatics.http://gisak.vsb.cz/GIS_Ostrava/GIS_Ova_2013/proceedings/papers/gis2013508aaf204a6ff.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jančura, P., Bohálová, I., Slámová, M., & Mišíková, P. (2010). Method of identification and assessment of characteristic landscape appearance.Bulletin of the Ministry of Environment of Slovak Republic, 18(Part 1b), 2–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurko, A. (1990).Ekologické a socio-ekonomické hodnotenie vegetácie. Bratislava: Píroda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. R., & Michalk, D. L. (2007). Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management.The Journal of Agricultural Science, 145(6), 543–564.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859607007253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersel, M. M., & Luke, C. H. (2015). Civil societies? Heritage diplomacy and neo-imperialism. In L. Meskell (Ed.),Global heritage: A reader (p. 2015). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschke, L., Fuerst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning.Ecological Indicators, 21, 54–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, C. (1991). Die Praxis der Landschaftsbilderfassung am Beispiel StrassenBau, BFANL (Hrsg.).Landschaftsbild-Eingriff-Ausgleich, pp. 121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krnáčová, Z., Barančok, P., Pavlíčková, K., & Platková, A. (2013).The methodological approaches comparison of the landscape offer and ecosystems benefits evaluation for ecological tourism (ECOTOUR) development options (Bratislava IV example – cadastre Devín). In: Abstracts of RegioResources 21, University of Catania, Catania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kureková, I. (2016). Prírodné a kultúrne dedičstvo (nielen) Slovenska.Enviromagazín, 5, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankia, T., Kopperoinen, L., Pouta, E., & Neuvonen, M. (2015). Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland.Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 10, 14–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieskovský, J., Rusňák, T., Klimantová, A., Izsóff, M., & Gašparovičová, P. (2017). Appreciation of landscape aesthetic values in Slovakia assessed by social media photographs.Open Geosciences, 9(1).https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2017-0044.

  • Lotan, A., Kost, R., Mandelik, Y., Peled, Y., Chakuki, D., Shamir, S. Z., & Ram, Y. (2018). National scale mapping of ecosystem services in Israel – Genetic resources, pollination and cultural services.One Ecosystem, 3, e25494.https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005).Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research.Ecology and Society, 18(3), 44.https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mišíková, P. (2002).Vnímanie krajiny (príkladová štúdia v lokalite Sĺňava – Piešťany). Papet presented at the Nové trendy v krajinnej ekológii, Comenius University in Bratislava, Piešťany, 24–26 October 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahuelhual, L., Carmona, A., Lozada, P., Jaramillo, A., & Aguayo, M. (2013). Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile.Applied Geography, 40, 71–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohl, W. (1991). Konzeptionelle und methodische Hinweise auf landschaftsästhetische Bewertungskriterien für die Eingriffsbestimmung und die Festlegung des Ausgleichs.Landschaftsbild-Eingriff-Ausgleich, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťaheľ, J. (1999). Visual landscape perception: Landscape pattern and aesthetic assessment.Ekologia Bratislava, 18(1), 63–74.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299069946_Visual_landscape_perception_Landscape_pattern_and_aesthetic_assessment. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oťaheľ, J. (2003). Visual quality of the landscape: Approaches to analysis.Ekologia Bratislava, 22(2), 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman, J. (2015). Assessing scenic beauty of nature-based landscapes of Fraser’s Hill.Procedia Environmental Sciences, 30, 115–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OZ Pronatur. (2014).Hodnotenie ekosystémových služieb v NP Muránska planina.https://www.minzp.sk/files/oblasti/ochrana-prirody-a-krajiny/ekosystemove-sluzby/povazan_mp_pronatur.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

  • Palkechová, L., & Kozáková, J. (2015). Ekonomika agroturistických prevádzok vo vybraných agrosubjektoch SR.Ekonomika poľnohospodárstva, 15, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pásková, M. (2008). In Gaudeamus Univerzita Hradec Králové (Ed.),Udržitelnost rozvoje cestovního ruchu (p. 298).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovič, F. (2005).Vývoj krajiny v oblasti štálového osídlenia Pohronského Inovca a Tribeča. Bratislava: ÚKE SAV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piscová, V., Hrnčiarová, T., Hreško, J., Dobrovodská, M., Izakovičová, Z., Iszoff, M., Kalivoda, H., Kanka, R., Kenderessy, P., Považan, R., Roháč, J., Slabejová, M., Slivinský, J., Špulerová, J., Švajda, J., Tepercer, J., Vlachovičová, M., Brorvský, I., & Hurta, V. (2018).Využívanie vysokohorskej krajiny a jeho dôsledky na zmenu prostredia (na príklade Tatier a Nízkych Tatier). Bratislava: VEDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourová, M. (2000).Agroturistika, možnosti rozvoje a perspektiva v České republice. Praha: KUFR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Považan, R. (2013). Rekreačné hodnoty NP Veľká Fatra.Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii séria envirnomentálne manažérstvo, 15(1), 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Považan, R., Getzner, M., & Švajda, J. (2014a). Value of ecosystem services in mountain national park. Case study of Veľká Fatra National Park (Slovakia).In: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23(5), 1699–1710. ISSN 1230-1485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Považan, R., Getzner, M., & Kadlečík, J. (2014b). Hodnotenie ekosystémových služieb v chránených územiach Karpát so zameraním na Slovensko – Príručka pre rýchle hodnotenie.Quaestiones rerum naturalium, 1(2), 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Považan, R., Getzner, M., & Švajda, J. (2015). On the valuation of ecosystem services in Muránska Planina National Park (Slovakia).Eco. Mont. Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 7(2), 61–69.https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-7-2s61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard, E., & Coratza, P. (2016). The importance of mountain geomorphosites for environmental education. Examples from the Italian Dolomites and the Swiss Alps.Acta geographica Slovenica, 56(2), 91–303.https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, T., Nogueira, M., & Vasco, A. (2016). Recreational activities in urban parks: Spatial interactions among users.Journal Outdoor recreation and Tourism, 15, 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Walz, A., Jones, I., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). The sociocultural value of upland regions in the vicinity of cities in comparison with urban green spaces.Mountain Research and Development, 36(4), 465–474.https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00044.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke, U., Scolozzi, R., Da re, R., Masiero, M., Pellegrino, D., & Marino, D. (2018). Recreational ecosystem services in protected areas: A survey of visitors to Natura 2000 sites in Italy.Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 21, 39–50. ISSN 2213-0780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., & Baessler, C. (2019).Atlas of ecosystem services. Drivers, risks, and societal responses. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sottini, V. A., Bernetti, I., Pecchi, M., & Cipollaro, M. (2018). Visual perception of the rural landscape: A study case in Val di Chiana aretina, Tuscany (Italy).Aestimum, 72, 5–26.https://doi.org/10.13128/Aestimum-23967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špulerová, J., Dobrovodská, M., Štefunková, D., Bača, A., & Lieskovský, J. (2014).Biodiversity of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia and their threats. Biocultural Landscapes. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Špulerová, J., Štefunková, D., Dobrovodská, M., Izakovičová, Z., Kenderessy, P., Vlachovičová, M., Lieskovský, J., Piscová, V., Petrovič, F., Kanka, R., Bača, A., Barančoková, M., Bezák, P., Bezáková, M., Boltižiar, M., Mojses, M., Dubcová, M., Gajdoš, P., Gerhátová, K., Izsóff, M., Kalivoda, H., Miklósová, V., Drábová, M., Šatalová, B., Krištín, A., Dankaninová, L., Kalivodová, E., Majzlan, O., Mihál, I., Stašiov, S., Šolomeková, T., Ambros, M., Baláž, I., & Halabuk, A. (2017). Historické štruktúry poľnohospodárskej krajiny Slovenska. Bratislava: Veda. 144 s. ISBN 978-80-224-1570-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štefunková, D. (2004). Príklad hodnotenia vizuálnej kvality krajiny v prostredí geografických informačných systémov na vybranom modelovom území. In V. Herber (Ed.),Fyzicko-geografický sborník 2, Kulturní krajina. Brno: Masaryk University in Brno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štefunková, D., & Cebecauer, T. (2006). Visibility analysis as a part of landscape visual quality assessment.Ekológia (Bratislava), 25(1), 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes.Landscape Urban Planning, 84(2), 127–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supuka, J., & Vreštiak, P. (1984).Základy tvorby parkových lesov (a iných rekreačne využívaných lesov). Bratislava: Veda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švajda, J. (2009). Contribution for improvement of visitor monitoring in the Tatra National Park.Eco. Mont-Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research, 1, 13–18.https://doi.org/10.1553/ecomont2s13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Švajda, J., & Fenichel, E. P. (2011). Evaluation of integrated protected area Management in Slovakian National Parks.Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 20(4), 1053–1060.http://www.pjoes.com/Evaluation-of-Integrated-Protected-Area-r-nManagement-in-Slovakian-National-Parks,88651,0,2.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švajda, J., Masny, M., Korony, S., Mezei, A., Machar, I., & Taczanowska, K. (2018). Visitor profiling using characteristics of socio-demographic and spatial behavior as tools to support the management of protected mountain areas.Geografie, 123(4), 461–478.https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2018123040461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, K. (2010). Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: The Satoyama initiative.Ecological Research, 25, 891–897.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. (2013).Guidance manual for TEEB country studies. Version 1.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, A., & Therond, O. (2017).Evaluation des services écosystémiques rendus par les écosystèmes agricoles. Une contribution au programme EFESE. Synthèse du rapport d’étude. France. INRA Science and Impact.https://www.inrae.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/efese-services-ecosystemiques-rendus-par-les-ecosystemes-agricoles-synthese-2.pdf

  • UK NEA. (2011).The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vačkář, D., Frélichová, J., Lorencová, E., Pártl, A., Harmáčková, Z., & Loučková, B. (2014).Metodologický rámec integrovaného hodnocení ekosystémových služeb v České republice.http://www.ecosystemservices.cz/cs/metodologicky-ramec-integrovaneho-hodnoceni-ekosystemovych-sluzeb-v-ceske-republice. Accessed 13 Apr 2019.

  • Vandewalle, M., Sykes, M. T., Harrison, P. A., Luck, G. W., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Dawson, T. P., Feld, C. K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J. R., Hering, D., Jones, K. B., Jongamn, R., & Lavorel, S. (2009).Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. The Rubicode Project Rationalising Biodiversity Conservation in Dynamic Ecosystems.http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Review_on_Ecosystem_Services.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

  • Vološčuk, I., Sabo, P., Škodová, M., Švajda, J., & Lepeška, T. (2016).Dynamika krajinnej štruktúry a diverzita ekosystémov Krivánskej Fatry. Banská Bystrica: Matej Bel University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöbse, H. H. (1991). Landschaftsästhetik und ihre Operationalisierungsmoglichkeiten bei der Anwendung des § 8 Bundesnaturschutzgesetz.Landschaftsbild-Eingriff-Ausgleich, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žarnovičan, H., Pavličková, K., & Kollár, J. (2018). Ovocné sady ako fenomén kultúrnej krajiny novobanskej štálovej oblasti.Životné prostredie, 52(4), 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory.Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Zita Izakovičová, Dagmar Štefunková, Jana Špulerová, Barbora Šatalová & Ján Černecký

  2. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

    Dominika Kaisová, Gréta Vrbičanová, Peter Mederly, František Petrovič, Matej Močko, Martina Turanovičová, Simona Gusejnov, Tomáš Kováč & Ján Černecký

  3. State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

    Ján Černecký & Viktória Ďuricová

  4. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

    Viktória Ďuricová

Authors
  1. Zita Izakovičová
  2. Dagmar Štefunková
  3. Jana Špulerová
  4. Dominika Kaisová
  5. Gréta Vrbičanová
  6. Peter Mederly
  7. František Petrovič
  8. Matej Močko
  9. Martina Turanovičová
  10. Barbora Šatalová
  11. Simona Gusejnov
  12. Tomáš Kováč
  13. Ján Černecký
  14. Viktória Ďuricová

Corresponding author

Correspondence toZita Izakovičová.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

    Peter Mederly

  2. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia, State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia, Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

    Ján Černecký

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Izakovičová, Z.et al. (2020). Cultural Ecosystem Services. In: Mederly, P., Černecký, J. (eds) A Catalogue of Ecosystem Services in Slovakia . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46508-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp