• Albert, C., Bonn, A., Burkhard, B., Daube, S., Dietrich, K., Engels, B., Frommeri, J., Goetzl, M., Gret-Regamey, A., Job-Hoben, B., Koellner, T., Marzelli, S., Moning, C., Mueller, F., Rabe, S.-E., Ring, I., SChwaiger, E., Schweppe-kraft, B., & Wuestemann, H. (2016). Towards a national set of ecosystem service indicators: Insights from Germany.Ecological Indicators, 61, 38–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.050.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ali-toudert, F., & Mayer, H. (2007). Effects of asymmetry, galleries, overhanging façades and vegetation on thermal comfort in urban street canyons.Solar Energy, 81, 742–754.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Altieri, M. A. (1999). The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74(1–3), 19–31.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6.

• Altieri, M. A. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(1), 35–42.https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0035:leatfi]2.0.co;2.

• Andow, D. (1991). Yield loss to arthropods in vegetationally diverse agroecosystems.Environmental Entomology, 20(5), 1228–1235.https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/20.5.1228.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Antal, J. (2005).Protierózna ochrana pôdy. Slovakia: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.

  Google Scholar 

• Barančok, P., & Barančoková, M. (2015). Distribution of the traditional agricultural landscape types reflecting geological substrate and slope processes in the Kysuce Region.Ekologia Bratislava, 34(4), 339–355.https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0031.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barka, I., & Rybár, R. (2003). Identification of snow avalanche trigger areas using GIS.Ecology, 22(2), 182–194.

  Google Scholar 

• Bebi, P., Kulakowski, D., & Rixen, C. (2009). Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems—State of research and implications for management.Forest Ecology Management, 257, 1883–1892.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.050.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Becerra-Jurado, G., Philipsen, C., & Kleeschulte, S. (2016).Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services in Luxembourg – Assessment results. Luxembourg: Le Gouvernment du Grand -Duché de Luxemburg.https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4924.5841.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Benelli, G., Benvenuti, S., Scaramozzino, P. L., & Canale, A. (2017). Food for honeybees? Pollinators and seed set of Anthyllis barba-jovis L. (Fabaceae) in arid coastal areas of the Mediterranean basin.Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 24(5), 1056–1060.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.018.

  Article PubMed PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Berry, R., Livesley, S. J., & Ayeb, L. (2013). Tree canopy shade impacts on solar irradiance received by building walls and their surface temperature.Building and Environment, 69, 91–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.009.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bezák, P., & Bezáková, M. (2014). Landscape capacity for ecosystem services provision based on expert knowledge and public perception (case study from the North West Slovakia).Ekologia Bratislava, 33(4), 344–353.https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2014-0031.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• BISE. (2019).The Biodiversity Information System for Europe.https://biodiversity.europa.eu/topics/ecosystem-services. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

• Bond, C. A., Hoag, D. L., & Kipperberg, G. (2011). Agricultural producers and the environment: A stated preference analysis of Colorado corn producers.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(1), 127–144.

  Google Scholar 

• Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units.Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services.The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 6.1–6.32.

  Google Scholar 

• Brodová, M. (2008).Ekonomické hodnotenie mimoprodukčných funkcií poľnohospodárstva v podmienkach. Dissertation, Slovak Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004). Hydrological functions of tropical forests: Not seeing the soil for the trees?Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 104, 185–228.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bujnovský, R. (2018). Estimation of benefits from the actual use of inland water ecosystem services in the Slovak Republic.Ekológia, 37(3), 201–218.https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2018-0017.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burkhard, B., & Maes, J. (Eds.). (2017).Mapping ecosystem services. Bulgaria. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets.Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., & Müller, F. (2014). Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification.Landscape Online, 34(1), 1–32.https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Čaboun, V., Tutka, J., Moravčík, M., Kovalčík, M., Sarvašová, Z., Schwarz, M., & Zemko, M. (2010).Uplatňovanie funkcií lesa v krajine. Zvolen: National Forest Centre.

  Google Scholar 

• Capotorti, G., Ortí, M. M. A., Anzellotti, I., Azzella, M. M., Copiz, R., Mollo, B., & Zavattero, L. (2015). The MAES process in Italy: Contribution of vegetation science to implementation of European Biodiversity Strategy to 2020.Plant Biosystems – An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 149(6), 949–953.https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2015.1095253.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Černecký, J., Gajdoš, P., Špulerová, J., Halada, Ľ., Mederly, P., Ulrych, L., Ďuricová, V., Švajda, J., Černecká, Ľ., Andráš, P., & Rybanič, R. (2020). Ecosystems in Slovakia.Journal of Maps, 16, 28–35.https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1689858.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Černý, J. (2012).Modelování povodňové vlny při destrukci vybrané vodní nádrže. Olomouc: Palacký University Olomouc.

  Google Scholar 

• Coates, D., Pert, P. L., Barron, J., Muthuri, C., Nguyen-Khoa, S., Boelee, E., & Jarvis, D. I. (2013). Water-related ecosystem services and food provision. In E. Boelee (Ed.),Managing water and agroecosystems for food provision (pp. 29–41). Wallingford: CABI.http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/CABI_Publications/CA_CABI_Series/Managing_Water_and_Agroecosystems/chapter_3-water-related_ecosystem_services_and_food_security.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.

  Google Scholar 

• Collins, K. L., Wilcox, A., Chaney, K., & Boatman, N. D. (1996). Relationships between polyphagous predator density and overwintering habitat within arable field margins and beetle banks. In:British crop protection conference: Pests and diseases, Brighton, UK, 18–21 November 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J., & Hanley, N. (2006). Analysing the social benefits of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods.Ecological Economics, 58, 850–861.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.010.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Czúcz, B., Arany, I., Potschin-Young, M., Bereczki, K., Kertész, M., Kiss, M., Aszalós, R., & Haines-Young, R. (2018). Where concepts meet the real world: A systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES.Ecosystem Services, 29, 145–157.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.018.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Groot, R. S. (1992).Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.

  Google Scholar 

• De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services.Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7.

• Dominati, E., Patterson, M., & Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils.Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1858–1868.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dudley, N., & Stolton, S. (2003).Running pure: The importance of forest protected areas to drinking water. Washington, DC/Gland: World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.

  Google Scholar 

• Dudley, N., Schlaepfer, R., Jackson, W., Jeanrenaud, J.-P., Stolton, S., Schlaepfer, R., Jackson, W., Jeanrenaud, J.-P., & Stolton, S. (2012).Forest quality: Assessing forests at a landscape scale. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• ENVIROPORTÁL. (2018).Indikátory stavu a ochrany biodiverzity.https://www.enviroportal.sk/indicator/301?langversion=sk. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.

• European Commission. (2012).A blueprint to safeguard Europe’s water resources.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0673&from=EN. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.

• European Commission. (2014a).System of environmental-economic accounting 2012 experimental ecosystem accounting. New York: European Commission Organisation for Economic Co-operation.

  Google Scholar 

• European Commission. (2014b).Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020.http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/knowledge/ecosystem_assessment/pdf/2ndMAESWorkingPaper.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2019.

• Farber, S., Costanza, R., Childers, D. L., Erickson, J., Gross, K., Grove, M., Hopkinson, C. S., Kahn, J., Pincetl, S., Troy, A., Warren, P., & Wilson, M. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management.BioScience, 56(2), 121–133.https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fernando, S. M., Montes, C., López, M. B., González, A. J., Aguado, M., Benayas, J., Piñeiro, C., Navacerrada, J., Zorrilla, P., Llorente, M. G., Iniesta, I., Oteros, E., Palomo, I., Santiago, C. S., Alcorlo, P., Vidal, R., & Suárez, L. (2013).Ecosystems and biodiversity for human wellbeing. Synthesis of the key findings. Madrid: Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischer, A., Fischer, H. S., & Lehnert, U. (2012). Avalanche creating high structural and floristic diversity in mountain mixed forests in the Alps.Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 643–654.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0204-z.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making.Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fowler, D., Pilegaard, K., Sutton, M. A., Ambus, P., et al. (2009). Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems-atmosphere interactions.Atmospheric Environment, 43, 5193–5267.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.068.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. V., & Lorencová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic.Ecosystem Services, 8, 110–117.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.

• Gallay, I. (2010). Využitie modelovania povrchového odtoku pri hodnotení zraniteľnosti krajiny vo vzťahu k vybraným prírodným hrozbám.Geografický časopis, 62(2), 109–125.

  Google Scholar 

• Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kremen, C., Morales, J. M., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S. A., Carvalheiro, L. G., Chacoff, N. P., Dudenhoeffer, J. H., Greenleaf, S. S., Holzschuh, A., Isaacs, R., Krewenka, K., Mandelik, Y., Mayfield, M. M., Morandin, L. A., Potts, S. G., Ricketts, T. H., Szentgyoergyi, H., Viana, B. F., Westphal, C., Winfree, R., & Klein, A. M. (2011). Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits.Ecology Letters, 14(10), 1062–1072.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x.

  Article PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Georgi, J. N., & Dimitriou, D. (2010). The contribution of urban green spaces to the improvement of environment in cities: Case study of Chania, Greece.Building and Environment, 45(6), 1401–1414.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.003.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Giarratano, M. C., et al. (2018).Comitato Capitale Naturale. Secondo Rapporto sullo Stato del Capitale Naturale in Italia. Roma.https://www.minambiente.it/comunicati/il-secondo-rapporto-sullo-stato-del-capitale-naturale-italia. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

• Granec, M., Šurina, B., et al. (1999).Atlas pôd SR. Bratislava: Soil Science and Conservation research Institute.

  Google Scholar 

• Grešová, L. (2010).Modelovanie veternej erózie v k.ú. Šaľa a Kráľová n. Váhom. Dissertation, Slovak Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., & Reynaud, A. (2015).Cook-book for water ecosystem service assessment and valuation (JRC Science and Policy Report). Luxembourg: European Commission.https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/science-update/cook-book-water-ecosystem-service-assessment-and-valuation. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

  Google Scholar 

• Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management.Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 194–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grunewald, K., Herold, H., Marzelli, S., Meinel, G., Richter, B., Syrbe, R.-U., & Walz, U. (2016). Concept of national indicators for ecosystem services in Germany further development, types of classes and sheet of indicators.Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 48, 141–152.https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haberl, H., Erb, K. H., Krausmann, F., Gaube, V., Bondeau, A., Plutzar, C., Gingrich, S., Lucht, W., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2007). Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(31), 12942–12947.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704243104.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2013).CICES V4.3-revised report prepared following consultation on CICES Version 4, August – December 2012. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham.https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf. Accessed 6.

• Halada, Ľ., Halabuk, A., & Gajdoš, P. (2011). Poľnohospodárska krajina s vysokými prírodnými hodnotami.Životné prostredie, 45(1), 12–16.

  Google Scholar 

• Hanley, N., Breeze, T. D., Ellis, C., & Goulson, D. (2015). Measuring the economic value of pollination services: Principles, evidence and knowledge gaps.Ecosystem Services, 14, 124–132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.013.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hreško, J. (1998). Avalanche hazard of the Tatra high mountain landscape.Folia Geographica, 2, 348–352.

  Google Scholar 

• Hreško, J., Bugár, G. (1999). Súčasný vývoj lavínových morfosystémov Belianskych Tatier. Paper presented at Prínos a perspektívy tatranského národného parku v ochrane prírodného dedičstva Karpát, Štátne lesy TANAPu, Stará Lesná, 25–28 Nov. 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• Hunter, B. A., Livesley, S., & Williams, N. S. G. (2012).Responding to the urban heat island: A review of the potential of green infrastructure.Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research.http://www.vcccar.org.au/sites/default/files/publications/VCCCAR%20Urban%20Heat%20Island%20-WEB.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2019.

• Janák, M., Černecký, J., & Saxa, A. (Eds.). (2015).Monitoring of animal species of community interest in the Slovak Republic. Results and assessment in the period of 2013–2015. Banská Bystrica: State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic.

  Google Scholar 

• Jäppinen, J. P., Heliölä, J. (Eds.). (2015). Towards a sustainable and genuinely green economy. The value and social significance of ecosystem Services in Finland (TEEB for Finland). InSynthesis and roadmap. Helsinki: The Finnish Ministry of Environment. Helsinki.

  Google Scholar 

• Jeníček, M. (2009).Modelování pruběhu extrémních povodní v kontextu krajinních změn a integrované protipovodňové ochrany. Prague: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science.

  Google Scholar 

• Jurko, A. (1990).Ekologické a socio-ekonomické hodnotenie vegetácie. Bratislava: Píroda.

  Google Scholar 

• Kadlec, V. (2010).Využitie zrážkovo-odtokových modelov v bystrinných povodiach. Disertation, Technical University of Zvolen.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaletová, T., & Šinka, K. (2012). Simulácia odtoku vody z extrémneho dažďa pomocou prostredia GIS a CN-metódy.Acta hydrologica Slovaca, 13(2), 324–333.

  Google Scholar 

• Keeler, B. L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K. A., Johnson, K. A., Finlay, J. C., O’Neill, A., Kovacs, K., & Dalzell, B. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(45), 18619–18624.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215991109.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keenleyside, C., & Tucker, G. (2010).Farmland abandonment in the EU: An assessment of trends and prospects: Report prepared for WWF. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.

  Google Scholar 

• Kizeková, M., Čunderlík, J., Dugátová, Z., Makovníková, J., Kanianska, R., Jaďuďová, J., Jančová, Ľ., & Pálka, B. (2016).Agroekosystémové služby a súčasný stav trávnych porastov v Slovenskej republike. Banská Bystrica: NPPC VÚTPHP Banská Bystrica, NPPC SSCRI Bratislava, UMB Banská Bystrica.

  Google Scholar 

• Kleeschulte, S., & Ruf, K. (2016).Mapping and assessing ecosystems and their services in Luxembourg – Amendment to final synthesis report. Luxembourg.

  Google Scholar 

• Kobza, J., Barančíková, G., Makovníková, J., Styk, J., Širáň, M., & Vojtáš, J. (2005).Návrh regulačných pôdoochranných opatrení z výsledkov monitoringu pôd SR. Bratislava: Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute.

  Google Scholar 

• Konarska, J., Lindberg, F., Larsson, A., Thorsson, S., & Holmer, B. (2013). Transmissivity of solar radiation through crowns of single urban trees—Application for outdoor thermal comfort modelling.Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 117, 363–376.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1000-3.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Konôpka, J. (2012). Manažment hydrických funkcií lesov.Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 58(2), 129–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Kontriš, J. (1978). Fyziognomicko-ekologická typizácia lesov a krovín a ich funkcia v krajine.Problémy ekológie krajiny, 23, 81–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P., & Niemelä, J. (2014). Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: An insight into a new place-based methodology.Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1361–1375.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kumar, P. (Ed.). (2010).The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations. London: UNEP/Earthprint.

  Google Scholar 

• Kunca, A., Galko, J., & Zúbrik, M. (2014). Aké významné kalamity v posledných rokoch postihli naše lesy?Letokruhy.http://www.lesmedium.sk/casopis-letokruhy/2014/letokruhy-2014-07/ake-vyznamne-kalamity-v-poslednych-rokoch-postihli-nase-lesy. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

• Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food provision.Science, 304(5677), 1623–1627.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., & Seppelt, R. (2011). Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data.Ecological Indicators, 11(2), 676–687.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lavelle, P., Tedaens, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Mergerie, P., Mora, P., & Rossi, J.-P. (2006). Siol invertebrates and ecosystem services.European Jounal of Siol Biology, 42(1), S3–S15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lavorel, S., Grigulis, K., Lamarque, P., Colace, M.-P., Garden, D., Girel, J., Pellet, G., & Douzet, R. (2011). Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services.Journal of Ecology, 99(1), 135.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, S. H., & Park, S. U. (2008). A vegetated urban canopy model for meteorological and environmental modelling.Bound-Lay Meteorol, 126(1), 73–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9221-6.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, H., Holst, J., & Mayer, H. (2013). Modification of human-biometeorologically significant radiant flux densities by shading as local method to mitigate heat stress in summer within urban street canyons.Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/312572.

• Lieskovský, J., Bezák, P., Špulerová, J., Lieskovský, T., Koleda, P., Dobrovodská, M., Buergi, M., & Gimmi, U. (2015). The abandonment of traditional agricultural landscape in Slovakia – Analysis of extent and driving forces.Journal of Rural Studies, 37, 75–84.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Loh, J., & Harmon, D. (2005). A global index of biocultural diversity.Ecological Indicators, 5(3), 231–241.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.02.005.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lotan, A., Kost, R., Mandelik, Y., Peled, Y., Chakuki, D., Shamir, S. Z., & Ram, Y. (2018). National scale mapping of ecosystem services in Israel – Genetic resources, pollination and cultural services.One Ecosystem, 3, e25494.https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e25494.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Luyssaert, S., Inglima, I., & Jung, M. (2007). CO₂ balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database.Global Change Biology, 13(12), 2509–2537.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maes, J., Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M. B., & Alkemade, R. (2012). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe.Biological Conservation, 155, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, C., Santos, F., Paracchini. M.L., Keune, H., Wittmer, H., Hauck, J., Fiala, I., Verburg, P.H., Condé, S., Schägner, J.P., San Miguel, J., EstreguiL, C., Ostermann, O., Barredo, J.I., Pereira, H.M., Stott, A., Laporte, V., Meiner, A., Olah, B., Royo Gelabert, E., Spyropoulou, R., Petersen, J.E., Maguire, C., Zal, N., AchilleoS, E., Rubin, A., Ledoux, L., Brown, C., Raes, C., Jacobs, S., Vandewalle, M., Connor, D., Bidoglio, G. (2013). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.

  Google Scholar 

• Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Murphy, P., Paracchini, M. L., Barredo, J. I., Grizzetti, B., Cardoso, A., Somma, F., Petersen, J.-E., Meine, R. A., Gelabert, E. R., Zal, N., Kristensen, P., Bastrup-Birk, A., Biala, K., Romao, C., Piroddi, C. H., Egoh, B., Fiorina, C. H., Santo, F., Naruševičius, V., Verboven, J., Pereira, H., Bengtsson, J., Gocheva, K., Marta-Pedroso, C., Snäll, T., Estreguil, C. H., San Miguel, J., Braat, L., Grêt-Regamey, A., Perez-Soba, M., Degeorges, P., Beaufaron, G., Lillebø, A., Abdul Malak, D., Liquete, C., Condé, S., Moen, J., Östergård, H., Czúcz, B., Drakou, E. G., Zulian, G., & Lavalle, C. (2014).Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES). Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 2nd Report – Final. European Union.

  Google Scholar 

• Maes, J., Fabrega, N., Zulian, G., Barbosa, A., Vizcaino, P., Ivits, E., Polce, C. H., Vandecasteele, I., Rivero, I. M., Guerra, C., Castillo, P. C., Vallecillo, S., Baranzelli, C., Barranco, R., Silva, B. F., CrisonI, C. H. J., & Trombetti, M. (2015).Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  Google Scholar 

• Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Grizzetti, B., Barredo, J. I., Paracchini, M. L., Condé, S., Somma, F., Orgiazzi, A., Jones, A., Zulian, A., Petersen, J. E., Marquardt, D., Kovacevic, V., Abdul Malak, D., Marin, A. I., Czúcz, B., Mauri, A., Loffler, P., Bastrup-Birk, A., Biala, K., Christiansen, T., & Werner, B. (2018).Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: An analytical framework for ecosystem condition. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.

  Google Scholar 

• Markov, B., & Nedkov, S. (2016). Mapping of erosion regulation ecosyste services. In Bandrova T., & Konečny, M. (Eds.),Proceedings 6th international conference on cartography and GIS, Albena, Bulgaria, 13–17 June 2011.

  Google Scholar 

• Matero, J., & Saastamoinen, O. (2007). In search of marginal environmental valuations – Ecosystem services in Finnish forest accounting.Ecological Economics, 61(1), 101–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.006.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005).Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

  Google Scholar 

• Mederly, P., Bezák, P., Lieskovský, J., Halabuk, A., Izakovičová, Z., & Dobrucká, A. (2017). Vybrané metódy hodnotenia ekosystémových služieb – projekt OpenNESS a prípadová štúdia Trnava.Životné Prostredie, 51, 205–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Melathopoulos, A. P., Cutler, G. C., & Tyedmers, P. (2015). Where is the value in valuing pollination ecosystem services to agriculture?Ecological Economics, 109, 59–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.007.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Minár, J., & Tremboš, P. (1994). Prírodné hazardy – hrozby, niektoré postupy ich hodnotenia. Acta Facultatis rerum naturalium Universitatis Comenianae.Geographica, 35, 173–194.

  Google Scholar 

• MoE SR. (2017).Envirorezort sa pripojil k iniciatíve za záchranu opeľovačov – Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky.http://www.minzp.sk/tlacovy-servis/tlacove-spravy/tlacove-spravy-2017/tlacove-spravy-marec-2017/envirorezort-pripojil-k-iniciative-za-zachranu-opelovacov.html. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

• Mooney, H., Larigauderie, A., Cesario, M., Elmqvist, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Lavorel, S., Mace, G. M., Palmer, M., Scholes, R., & Yahara, T. (2009). Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 46–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.006.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• MPSR NLC. (2018).Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v Slovenskej republike za rok 2017 – Zelená správa.http://www.mpsr.sk/index.php?navID=123&id=13656. Accessed 4 Apr 2019.

• Muth, M. K., & Thurman, W. N. (1995). Why support the price of honey?Choices, 10(2), 19–22.https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.131245.

• Mwebaze, P., Marris, G. C., Budge, G. E., Brown, M., Potts, S. G., Breeze, T. D., & Macleod, A. 2010.Quantifying the value of ecosystem services: A case study of honeybee pollination in the UK. Paper presented at 12th annual BIOECON conference “from the wealth of nations to the wealth of nature: Rethinking economic growth”, Venice, Centro Culturale Don Orione Artigianelli, 27–28 September 2010.

  Google Scholar 

• Nakaohkubo, K., & Hoyano, A. (2011).Development of passive design tool using 3D-Cad compatible thermal simulation – Prediction of indoor radiation environment considering solar shaving by surrounding trees and buildings. Paper presented at proceedings of building simulation 2011: 12th conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 14–16 November 2011.

  Google Scholar 

• National Council of the Slovak Republic – NR SR (2002).Zákon NR SR 543/2002 Z. z. o ochrane prírody a krajiny v znení neskorších predpisov.

  Google Scholar 

• Neher, D. A., Weicht, T. R., & Barbercheck, M. E. (2012). Linking invertebrate communities to decomposition rate and nitrogen availability in pine forest soils.Applied Soil Ecology, 54, 14–23.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.12.001.

• NEPA. (2017).Assessment of ecosystems and ecosystem services in Romania. Romania: NEPA, NINA, ROSA, WWF Romania.

  Google Scholar 

• Offenberg, J. (2015). REVIEW: Ants as tools in sustainable agriculture.Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(5).https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12496.

• Olschewski, R., Tscharntke, T., Benítez, P., Schwarze, S., & Klein, A.-M. (2006). Economic evaluation of pollination services comparing coffee landscapes in Ecuador and Indonesia.Ecology and Society, 11(1), 7.https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01629-110107.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Palm, C. H., Blanco-Canqui, H., Declerckc, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014). (2014). Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview.Agriculture.Ecosystems and Environment, 187, 87–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Papánek, F. (1978).Teória a prax funkčne integrovaného lesného hospodárstva. Bratislava: Príroda.

  Google Scholar 

• Parker, N., Naumann, E.-K., Medcalf, K., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Kretsch, C., Parker, J., & Burkhard, B. (2016).Irish wildlife manuals, national ecosystem and ecosystem service mapping pilot for a suite of prioritised services – appendices. Ireland: National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage, Regional, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.

  Google Scholar 

• Pavlík, M., Lukáčik, I., & Šulek, J. (2015). Rozklad odpadovej dendromasy drevokaznými hubami na modelových plochách v Arboréte Borová hora. InAbstracts of Dendroflora of Central Europe – utilization of knowledge in research, education and practice. Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, 10–11 June, 2015.

  Google Scholar 

• Pechoušková, V. (2006).Modelování mělkých sesuvu a eroze v prostředí GIS GRASS. Dissertation, Palacký University Olomouc.

  Google Scholar 

• Pérez-Soba, M., Harrison, P. A., Smith, A. C., Simpson, G., Uiterwijk, M., Miguel Ayala, L, Archaux, F., Erős, T., Fabrega Domenech, N., György, Á. I., Haines-Young, R., Li, S., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Mononen, L., Stange, E., Turkelboom, F., Veerkamp, C., & Wyllie De Echeverria, V. (2015).Database and operational classification system of ecosystem service – natural capital relationships. EU FP7 OpenNESS Project Deliverable 3.1. European Commission.http://www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/OpenNESS_D3.1_Final.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2019.

• Perni, Á., Martínez-Paz, J., & Martínez-Carrasco, F. (2012). Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: The Segura River, Spain.Water and Environment Journal, 26(2).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00286.x.

• Pielou, E. C. (1975).Ecological diversity. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Potts, S. G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H. T., Aizen, M. A., Biesmeijer, J. C., Breeze, T. D., Dicks, L. V., Garibaldi, L. A., Hill, R., Settele, J., & Vanbergen, A. J. (2016). Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being.Nature, 540, 220–229.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20588.

  Article CAS PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Považan, R., Getzner, M., & Kadlečík, J. (2014a). Hodnotenie ekosystémových služieb v chránených územiach Karpát so zameraním na Slovensko – Príručka pre rýchle hodnotenie.Quaestiones Rerum Naturalium, 1(2), 7–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Považan, R., Getzner, M., & Švajda, J. (2014b). Value of ecosystem services in mountain national park. Case study of Veľká Fatra National Park (Slovakia).Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23(5), 1699–1710.

  Google Scholar 

• Preston, S. M., & Raudsepp-Hearne, C. (2017).Ecosystem service toolkit: Completing and using ecosystem service assessment for decision-making: An interdisciplinary toolkit for managers and analysts. Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Governments of Canada, Ottawa. Ottawa: Environment and Climate Change Canada Enquiry Centre.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabe, S.-E., Koellner, T., Marzelli, S., Schumacher, P., & Gret-Regamey, A. (2016). National ecosystem services mapping at multiple scales – the German exemplar.Ecological Indicators, 70, 357–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.043.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(11), 5242–5247.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ricketts, T. H., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Michener, C. D. (2004). Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(34), 12579–12582.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405147101.

  Article CAS  Google Scholar 

• Ricketts, T. H., Regetz, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., Bogdanski, A., Gemmill-Herren, B., Greenleaf, S. S., Klein, A. M., Mayfield, M. M., Morandin, L. A., Ochieng, A., & Viana, B. F. (2008). Landscape effects on crop pollination services: Are there general patterns?Ecology Letters, 57(4), 499.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rodríguez, J. P., Beard, T. D., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services.Ecology and Society, 11(1), 28.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/.

  Google Scholar 

• ROTAP. (2012).Review of transboundary air pollution: Acidification, eutrophication, ground level ozone and heavy metals in the UK.http://www.rotap.ceh.ac.uk/files/RoTAP%20Summary%20report_0.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2019.

• Royal Society. (2008).Ground level ozone in the 21st century: Future trends, impacts and policy implications (Science Policy report 15/18). London: The Royal Society.https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/publications/2008/7925.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.

  Google Scholar 

• Rusch, A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Gardiner, M. M., Hawro, V., Holland, J., Landis, D., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T., Weisser, W. W., Winqvist, C., Woltz, M., & Bommarco, R. (2016). Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: A quantitative synthesis.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 221(1), 198–204.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.039.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Šabo, M., Minár, J., Holec, J., & Žiak, M. (2012). Syntetické hodnotenie vybraných prírodných hrozieb v oblasti Západných Karpát – prvé priblíženie.Geografický časopis, 64(4), 335–355.

  Google Scholar 

• Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., & Cullen, R. (2010). The role of supporting ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable farmland.Ecological Complexity, 7, 302–310.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.006.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Santos, T., Nogueira, M., & Vasco, A. (2016). Recreational activities in urban parks: Spatial interactions among users.Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 15, 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2016.06.001.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., & Baessler, C. (2019).Atlas of ecosystem services. Drivers, risks, and societal responses. Cham: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Šefferová Stanová, V., & Galvánková, J. (Eds.). (2015).Monitoring of plants and habitats of Community interest in the Slovak Republic. Results and assessment in the period of 2013–2015. Banská Bystrica: State nature conservancy of the Slovak Republic.

  Google Scholar 

• Seják, J., & Dejmal, I. (2003).Hodnocení a oceňování biotopů České republiky. Praha: Český ekologický ústav.

  Google Scholar 

• Seják, J., Cudlín, P., Pokorný, J., Zapletal, M., Petříček, V., Guth, J., Chuman, T., Romportl, D., Skořepová, I., Vacek, V., Vyskot, I., Černý, K., Hesslerová, P., Burešová, R., Prokopová, M., Plch, R., Engstová, B., & Stará, L. (2010).Hodnocení funkcí a služeb ekosystémů České republiky. Ústí nad Labem: Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem.

  Google Scholar 

• Shashua-Bar, L., Potcher, O., Bitan, A., Boltansky, D., & Yaakov, Y. (2010). Microclimate modelling of street tree species effects within the varied urban morphology in the Mediterranean city of Tel Aviv, Israel.International Journal of Climatology, 30(1), 44–57.https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1869.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Šinka, K., Muchová, Z., & Konc, Ľ. (2013).Aplikácie geografických informačných systémov v pozemkových úpravách. Nitra: Slovak Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Skalský, R., Pavledna, P., Barančíková, G., Koco, Š., Barka, I., Tarasovičová, Z., & Makovníková, J. (2017).Odhad zásob organického uhlíka v povrchovej vrstve pôd Slovenska. Bratislava: Research Institute of Soil Science and Soil Protection.

  Google Scholar 

• Sláviková, D. (1987).Ochrana rozptýlenej zelene v krajine. Metodicko-námetová príručka. Bratislava: SZOPK.

  Google Scholar 

• Smelík, L. (2016). Analýza změn odtokových poměrů pro Českou republiku.Vodohospodářské technicko-ekonomické informace, 58(4), 7–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, P., et al. (2011). Regulating services. In L. Davies et al. (Eds.),UK National ecosystem assessment. Understanding nature’s value to society (Technical Report) (pp. 535–596). Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, P., Ashmore, M. R., Black, H. I., Burgess, P. J., Evans, C. D., Quine, T. A., Thomson, A. M., Hicks, K., & Harriet, G. (2012). The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality.Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 812–829.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12016.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Solín, Ľ. (2003). Koncepcia regionálnej hydrogeografie Slovenska.Geografický časopis, 55(2), 125–139.

  Google Scholar 

• Solín, Ľ. (2011). Regionálna variabilita povodňovej hrozby malých povodí na Slovensku.Geografický časopis, 63(1), 29–52.

  Google Scholar 

• Solín, Ľ. (2017). Flood Hazard in a mountainous region of Slovakia. In A. M. Negm & M. Zeleňáková (Eds.),Water resources in Slovakia: Part II – Climate change, drought and floods (Vol. 70, pp. 147–172). Cham: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_172.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Solín, Ľ., Skubinčan, P., & Madajová, M. (2016). A preliminary flood-risk assessment of municipalities located in headwater basins of Slovakia based on an integrated approach. In C. A. Brebbia (Ed.),WIT transactions on information and communication technologies (Vol. 47, pp. 61–72). Southampton: WIT Press.https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK140061.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Špulerová, J. (2007). Nelesná vegetácia a jej hodnotenie pre potreby ochrany prírody. InAbstracts of zo 4. Študentskej vedeckej konferencie: Ekológia a Environmentalistika. Technical University in Zvolen.

  Google Scholar 

• Špulerová, J., Dobrovodská, M., Štefunková, D., Bača, A., & Lieskovský, J. (2014).Biodiversity of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia and their threats. Biocultural landscapes. Dordrecht: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Špulerová, J., Štefunková, D., Dobrovodská, M., et al. (2017).Historické štruktúry poľnohospodárskej krajiny Slovenska. Bratislava: VEDA.

  Google Scholar 

• Špulerová, J., Petrovič, F., Mederly, P., Mojses, M., & Izakovičová, Z. (2018). Contribution of traditional farming to ecosystem services provision: Case studies from Slovakia.Land, 7(2), 74.https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020074.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanová, V., Valachovič, M. (2002). Katalóg Biotopov Slovenska. Bratislava: DAPHNE – Inštitút aplikovanej ekológie.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, M., Demolder, H., Jacobs, S., Michels, H., Schneiders, A., Simoens, I., Spanhove, T., Van Gossum, P., Van Reeth, W., & Peymen, J. (2015).Flanders regional ecosystem assessment – State and trends synthesis report.https://pureportal.inbo.be/portal/files/9004761/Stevens_etal_2015_FlandersRegionalEcosystemAssessment_State_Trends.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

• Streďanský, J., Dobák, D., Sollár, M., & Kliment, M. (2005). Súčasné spôsoby určovania intenzity veternej erózie v SR. In J. Rožnovský & T. Litschmann (Eds.),Bioklimatologie současnosti a budoucnostipp. Křtiny: Sborník abstraktů.

  Google Scholar 

• Supuka, J. (1998). Vegetačné formácie ako nástroj tvorby krajiny.Životné prostredie, 32(5), 229–232.

  Google Scholar 

• Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W., Billen, G., Bleeker, A., Grennfelt, P., & Grinsven, B. (2011).The European nitrogen assessment: Sources, effects and policy perspectives.http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/06126/frontmatter/9781107006126_frontmatter.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

• Takács, Á., Kiss, M., & Gulyás, Á. (2014). Some aspects of indicator development for mapping microclimate regulation ecosystem service of urban tree stands.Acta Climatologica et Chorologica, 47–48, 99–108.

  Google Scholar 

• Tallis, H. T., Ricketts, T. H., Guerry, A. D., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., & Bernhardt, J. (2011).InVEST 2.0 beta user’s guide. Stanford: The Natural Capital Project.

  Google Scholar 

• Termansen, M., Konrad, M., Levin, G., Hasler, B., Thorsen, B. J., Aslam, U., BOjesen, M., Hedemark Lundhede, T., Panduro, T. E., Estrup Andersen, H., & Strange, N. (2017).Udvikling og afprøvning af metode til modellering af økosystemtjenester og biodiversitetsindikatorer – med henblik på kortlægning af synergier og konfl ikter ved arealtiltag. Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi.

  Google Scholar 

• Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005). Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – Ecosystem service management.Ecology Letters, 8(8), 857.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• UK NEA. (2011).The UK national ecosystem assessment. Understanding nature’s value to society (Technical Report). Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.

  Google Scholar 

• UNEP WCMC. (2011).Approach for reporting on ecosystem services – UNEP-WCMC.https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/approach-for-reporting-on-ecosystem-services.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

• Vačkář, D., Frélichová, J., Lorencová, E., Pártl, A., Harmáčková, Z., & Loučková, B. (2014).Metodologický rámec integrovaného hodnocení ekosystémových služeb v České republice.http://www.ecosystemservices.cz/cs/metodologicky-ramec-integrovaneho-hodnoceni-ekosystemovych-sluzeb-v-ceske-republice. Accessed 13 Apr 2019.

• Vanbergen, A. J., Baude, M., Biesmeijer, J. C., Britton, N. F., Brown, M. J. F., Brown, M., Bryden, J., Budge, G. E., Bull, J. C., Carvell, C., Challinor, A. J., Connolly, C. N., Evans, D. J., Feil, E. J., Garratt, M. P., Greco, M. K., Heard, M. S., Jansen, V. A. A., Keeling, M. J., Kunis, W. E., Marris, G. C., Memmott, J., Murray, J. T., Nicolson, S. W., Osborne, J. L., Paxton, R. J., Pirk, C. W. W., Polce, C., Potts, S. G., Priest, N. K., Raine, N. E., Roberts, S., Ryabov, E. V., Shafir, S., Shirley, M. D. F., Simpson, S. J., Stevenson, P. C., Stone, G. N., Termansen, M., & Wright, G. A. (2013). Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 251.https://doi.org/10.1890/120126.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vihervaara, P., Kumpula, T., Tanskanen, A., & Burkhard, B. (2010). Ecosystem services – A tool for sustainable management of human–environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland.Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 410–420.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vihervaara, P., Kumpula, T., Ruokolainen, A., Tanskanen, A., & Burkhard, B. (2012). The use of detailed biotope data for linking biodiversity with ecosystem services in Finland.International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 8(1–2), 169–185.https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.686120.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vilček, J. (2014). Mapovanie a hodnotenie environmentálnych funkcií poľnohospodárskych pôd Slovenska.Geografický časopis, 66(3), 287–304.

  Google Scholar 

• Vranic, P., Zhiyanski, M., & Milutinovic, S. (2016). A conceptual framework for linking urban green lands ecosystem services with planning and design tools for amelioration of micro-climate.Journal of Integrative Environmental Science, 13(2–4), 129–143.https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2016.1201516.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Žiak, M. (2012).Lavínová hrozba, bilancia energie a hmoty vo vysokohorskom prostredí. Dissertation, Comenius University in Bratislava.

  Google Scholar 

• Zulian, G., et al. (2013).ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale. Brussel: Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

  Google Scholar 

Download references