• Bardach, Eugene, and Eric M. Patashnik. 2016.A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Boucher, Philip. 2018.Assistive Technologies for People with Disabilities. Brussels: STOA—European Parliamentary Research Service.

  Google Scholar 

• Compernolle, Theo. 2014.Brain Chains: Discover Your Brain and Unleash Its Full Potential in a Hyperconnected Multitasking World. Brussels: Compublications.

  Google Scholar 

• Druckman, James N., and Arthur Lupia. 2017. “Using Frames to Make Scientific Communication More Effective.” InThe Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication, edited by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan, and Dietram Scheufele. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Elliott, Alex, Angela McLean, Charles Godfray, Colin Muirhead, David Mackay, Dudley Goodhead, Elisabeth Cardis, et al. 2017. “‘Oxford Martin Restatement 5’: A Restatement of the Natural Science Evidence Base Concerning the Health Effects of Low-Level Ionizing Radiation.” Oxford Martin School.https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/view/2583. Accessed January 20, 2019.

• European Parliamentary Research Service. 2018. “Circular Economy.” YouTube Video.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7AgYY6ui54.

• Funk, Cary, and Brian Kennedy. 2019. “Public Confidence in Scientists Has Remained Stable for Decades.”https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/03/22/public-confidence-in-scientists-has-remained-stable-for-decades/. Accessed March 22, 2019.

• Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-normal Age.”Futures 25 (7): 739–755.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-l.

• Government Office for Science. 2011.Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees. London: UK Government Office for Science.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/278498/11-1382-code-of-practice-scientific-advisory-committees.pdf.

• Kahan, Dan M. 2017. “On the Sources of Ordinary Science Knowledge and Extraordinary Science Ignorance.” InThe Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication, edited by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan, and Dietram Scheufele, 35–49. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kahneman, Daniel. 2012.Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.

  Google Scholar 

• Makri, Anita 2013. “Science and NGO Practice: Facts and Figures.”Sci Dev Net.https://www.scidev.net/global/capacity-building/feature/science-and-ngo-practice-facts-and-figures.html. Accessed January 21, 2019.

• McGann, James G. 2018.2017 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report: Vol. 13,TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports.https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=think_tanks.

• Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001.Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  Google Scholar 

• O’Neill, Onora. 2002.A Question of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010.Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Oxford Martin School. “Oxford Martin Restatements.”https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/policy/restatements/. Accessed January 21, 2019.

• Parr, Ben. 2016.Captivology: The Science of Capturing People’s Attention. New York: HarperOne.

  Google Scholar 

• Ravetz, Jerome R. 1971.Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ravetz, Jerome R., Andrea Saltelli, Silvio Funtowicz, Mario Giampietro, Roger Strand, Ângela Guimarães Pereira, Jeroen van der Sluijs, and Alice Benessia. 2006.The No-Nonsense Guide to Science. Oxford: New Internationalist.

  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, Warren, Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jergen Randers, and William W. Behrens. 1973.The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe.

  Google Scholar 

• Skinner, Gideon, and Michael Clemence. 2018. “Advertising Execs Rank Below Politicians as Britain’s Least-Trusted Profession.”Ipsos MORI.https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/advertising-execs-rank-below-politicians-britains-least-trusted-profession.

• Stephens, Andrea, Andrew Johnson, Angela McLean, Charles Godfray, Charles Tyler, John Sumpter, Paul Jepson, Peter Matthiessen, and Susan Jobling. 2019. “Oxford Martin Restatement 6: A Restatement of the Natural Science Evidence Base on the Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals on Wildlife.” Oxford Martin School.https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/view/2834.

• STOA. 2013. “Food Eco-Foot Print.” Edited by Science and Technology Options Assessment: STOA.

  Google Scholar 

• Sunstein, Cass R. 2017.#Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• UK Cabinet Office. 2012. “A Strategic Framework for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage).” Edited by UK Cabinet Office.

  Google Scholar 

• Unknown. 1969. “Smoking and Health Proposal—Tobacco Industry Influence in Public Policy.” InMinnesota Documents, edited by Brown & Williamson Records.

  Google Scholar 

Download references