Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

How Bias Distorts Evidence and Its Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series:St Antony's Series ((STANTS))

  • 1089Accesses

Abstract

Scientific policy advisers collect information and on its basis formulate alternative policy options for policy-makers to consider. Throughout the process, biases can cause systematically distorted perceptions of facts and opinions in virtue of which advisers fail to weigh evidence, assessments and points of view objectively. The chapter first develops a better understanding of unconscious biases, what they are and how they occur. It then introduces the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance, which explains why we are intrinsically biased. Next, it describes and illustrates some well-known and some lesser-known biases. Finally, the chapter proposes the bias wheel as a practical method of checking for bias and promoting bias-awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7435
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

References

  • Aronson, E., T. D. Wilson, R. M. Akert, and S. Sommers. 2018.Social Psychology. 9th ed., Global ed. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, D. 2015.EU Biofuels Policy Dealing with Indirect Land Use Change. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, D. 2017.Advanced Biofuels: Technologies and EU Policy. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowls. n.d. Lawn Bowling—A Complete Beginners’ Guide. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bowls.org.uk/flat-green. Accessed November 11, 2018.

  • Compernolle, T. 2014.BrainChains: Discover Your Brain and Unleash Its Full Potential in a Hyperconnected Multitasking World. London: Compublications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. 1998. “The Trajectory of a Ball in Lawn Bowls.”American Journal of Physics 66 (8): 735–738.https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19028.

  • Deer, B. 2009. MMR Doctor Andrew Wakefield Fixed Data on Autism.The Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mmr-doctor-andrew-wakefield-fixed-data-on-autism-mgj82qsk50g.

  • Deer, B. 2011. “How the Vaccine Crisis Was Meant to Make Money.”British Medical Journal 342 (7789).https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5258.

  • Demicheli, V., A. Rivetti, M. G. Debalini, and C. Di Pietrantonj. 2013. “Vaccines for Measles, Mumps and Rubella in Children.”Evidence‐Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal 8 (6): 2076–2238.https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1948.

  • Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the Promotion of the Use of Biofuels or Other Renewable Fuels for Transport L 123 C.F.R. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (EEA). 2008.Suspend 10 Percent Biofuels Target, Says EEA’s Scientific Advisory Body. 30 April 2008 ed. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, D. K. 2011. “The Vaccine-Autism Connection: A Public Health Crisis Caused by Unethical Medical Practices and Fraudulent Science.”Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45 (10): 1302–1304.https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1q318.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2008.The State of Food and Agriculture 2008. Biofuels: Prospects, Risks and Opportunities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godlee, F. 2011. “The Fraud Behind the MMR Scare.”British Medical Journal 342 (January 6).https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d22.

  • Goldacre, B. 2009.Bad Science. Paperback ed. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B. 2011.Cognitive Psychology. 3rd ed. Australia, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. 2004. “A Statement by the Editors of The Lancet.”The Lancet 363 (9411): 820–821.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15699-7.

  • Huff, D. 1954.How to Lie with Statistics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2012.Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keville, T. D. 1994. “The Invisible Woman: Gender Bias in Medical Research.”Women’s Rights Law Reporter 15: 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S. 2013. “Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research? An Inquiry into the ‘Funding Effect’ Hypothesis.”Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (4): 566–587.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912456271.

  • MacKenzie, D. 2012. “Study Linking GM Crops and Cancer Questioned.”New Scientist. Retrieved fromhttps://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22287-study-linking-gm-crops-and-cancer-questioned/.

  • McIntyre, P., and J. Leask. 2008. “Improving Uptake of MMR Vaccine.”British Medical Journal 336 (7647): 729.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39503.508484.80.

  • Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2017.The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1903.Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS. 2004.Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Edited by N. A. O. Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS. 2012.MMR the Facts. Edited by In D. O. H. P. NHS Immunisation Information. London, UK: National archives.gov.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010.Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. 1st U.S. ed. New York and London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepys, M. B. 2007. “Science and Serendipity.”Clinical Medicine (London, England) 7(6): 562.https://doi.org/10.3399/096016407782604776.

  • Pielke, R. A. 2007.The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E., D. Y. Lin, and L. Ross. 2002. “The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (3): 369–381.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008.

  • Reeve, I., J. Scott, D. Hine, and N. Bhullar. 2013. “‘This Is Not a Burning Issue for Me’: How Citizens Justify Their Use of Wood Heaters in a City with a Severe Air Pollution Problem.”Energy Policy 57: 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, J. A. 2016. “Of Natural Bodies and Antibodies: Parents’ Vaccine Refusal and the Dichotomies of Natural and Artificial.”Social Science & Medicine 157 (C): 103–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.001.

  • Semmens, E. O., C. W. Noonan, R. W. Allen, E. C. Weiler, and T. J. Ward. 2015. “Indoor Particulate Matter in Rural, Wood Stove Heated Homes.”Environmental Research 138: 93–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.005.

  • Séralini, G.-E., E. Clair, R. Mesnage, S. Gress, N. Defarge, M. Malatesta, D. Hennequin, and J. S. de Vendômois. 2012a. “Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize.”Food and Chemical Toxicology: An International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 50 (11): 4221.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005.

  • Séralini, G.-E., E. Clair, R. Mesnage, S. Gress, N. Defarge, M. Malatesta, D. Hennequin, and J. S. de Vendômois. 2012b. “RETRACTED: Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize.”Food and Chemical Toxicology 50 (11): 4221–4231.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005.

  • Séralini, G.-E., E. Clair, R. Mesnage, S. Gress, N. Defarge, M. Malatesta, D. Hennequin, and J. S. de Vendômois. 2014. “Republished Study: Long-Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize.”Environmental Sciences Europe 26 (1): 14.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0014-5.

  • Šimundić, A.-M. 2013. “Bias in Research.”Biochemia Medica 23 (1): 12–15.https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2013.003.

  • Skovmand, A., A. C. Damiao Gouveia, I. K. Koponen, P. Møller, S. Loft, and M. Roursgaard. 2017. “Lung Inflammation and Genotoxicity in Mice Lungs After Pulmonary Exposure to Candle Light Combustion Particles.”Toxicology Letters 276: 31–38.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.04.015.

  • Spencer, H. 1873.The Study of Sociology. London: Henry S. King. Consulted onhttp://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/spencer-the-study-of-sociology-1873.

  • Spiegelhalter, D. 2017. “Trust in Numbers.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 180 (4): 948–965.https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12302.

  • Tholen, B. 2017.Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. E., and A. R. Pratkanis. 1998. “Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73 (2–3): 105–115.https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2756.

  • Wakefield, A. J., S. H. Murch, A. Anthony, et al. 1998. “Ileal–Lymphoid–Nodular Hyperplasia, Non-specific Colitis, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder in Children.”Lancet 351: 637–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikisource Contributors. 2019. “1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Bowls.”Wikisource.https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Bowls&oldid=5459858. Accessed June 25, 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Foresight Unit, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, Belgium

    Lieve Van Woensel

Authors
  1. Lieve Van Woensel

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLieve Van Woensel.

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Woensel, L. (2020). How Bias Distorts Evidence and Its Assessment. In: A Bias Radar for Responsible Policy-Making. St Antony's Series. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32126-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 7435
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info
Hardcover Book
JPY 9294
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide -see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp