• Basu, K. (1999). Child labor: Cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards.Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1083–1119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chowdhry, G., & Beeman, M. (2001). Challenging child labor: Transnational activism and India’s carpet industry.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 575, 158–175.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Evans, P., & Stephans, J. D. (1988). Studying development since the sixties – the emergence of a new comparative political-economy.Theory and Society, 17, 713–745.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kacker, L., Varadan, S., & Kumar, P. (2007).Study on child abuse: India 2007. Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India. Retrieved fromhttp://www.violencestudy.org/IMG/pdf/childabuseIndia2007.pdf

• Kambhampati, U. S., & Rajan, R. (2006). Economic growth: A panacea for child labor?World Development, 34, 426–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kapadia, K. (2002). Translocal modernities and transformations. In K. Kapadia (Ed.),The violence of development: The politics of identity, gender, and social inequality in India (pp. 142–179). New Delhi: Kali for women.

  Google Scholar 

• Kinnaird, V., & Momsen, J. (1993).Different places, different voices: Gender and development in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Krishnan, M., Skandan, K., & Kochher, J. S. (2007).Report of the committee investigating into allegations of large scale sexual abuse, rape and murder of children in Nithari village of NOIDA (UP). Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India. Retrieved fromhttp://wcd.nic.in/nitharireport.pdf

• Lal, N. (2007).Hidden darkness: Child sexual abuse in India. Retrieved fromhttp://www.asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=476&Itemid=34

• Makman, L. H. (2002). Child crusaders: The literature of global childhood.The Lion and the Unicorn, 26, 287–304.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reddock, R. (2002). Why gender? Why development? In P. C. J. Parpart & V. U. Barritreau (Eds.),Theoretical perspectives on gender and development (pp. 23–50). Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Center.

  Google Scholar 

• Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: Good governance in the best interests of the child.Environment and Urbanization, 14, 45–58.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, W. I. (1998). Beyond nation-state paradigms: Globalization, sociology, and the challenge of transnational studies.Sociological Forum, 13, 561–594.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, W. I. (2001). Transnational processes, development studies and changing social hierarchies in the world system: A Central American case study.Third World Quarterly, 22, 529–563.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Segal, U. A. (1999). Children are abused in Eastern countries: A look at India.International Social Work, 42, 39–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smolin, D. M. (2000). Strategic choices in the international campaign against child labor.Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 942–987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Swaminathan, M. (1998). Economic growth and the persistence of child labor: Evidence from an Indian city.World Development, 26, 1513–1528.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• UNICEF.Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved fromhttp://www.unicef.org/crc/

Download references