• Barwise, J.: 1978, ‘Monotone Quantifiers and Admissible Sets.’ InGeneralized Recursion Theory II, North-Holland, pp. 1–38.

• Barwise, J.: 1979, ‘On Branching Quantifiers in English.’J. Phil. Logic8, pp. 47–80.

  Google Scholar 

• Barwise, Jon: 1980, ‘Scenes and Other Situations.’ Stanford preprint.

• Chomsky, Noam: 1980, ‘On Binding.’Linguistic Inquiry,11.1, pp. 1–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, H. H.: 1976,Semantics and Comprehension, Mouton.

• Cooper, Robin: 1978, ‘A Fragment of English with Questions and Relative Clauses.’ University of Wisconsin, Madison.

  Google Scholar 

• Dowty, David: 1979,Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.

  Google Scholar 

• Fenstad, J-E.: 1978, ‘Models for Natural Languages’, inEssays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen), Dordrecht.

• Gazdar, Gerald: 1979, ‘English as a Context-Free Language.’ University of Sussex xerox.

• Grice, Paul: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation.’ InSyntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (ed. by PeterCole and JerryMorgan), New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jenkins, Lyle: 1975,The English Existential. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Horn, Laurence: 1976,On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club.

• Kamp, J. A. W.: 1975, ‘Two Theories About Adjectives.’ InFormal Semantics of Natural Language: Papers from a colloquium sponsored by the King's College Research Centre, Cambridge (ed. by EdwardKeenan). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaplan, D.: 1966, ‘Rescher's Plurality-Quantification' and Generalized Plurality Quantification,’ abstracts,J. Symbolic Logic31, p. 153–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions.’Linguistics and Philosophy, Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 3–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Keisler, H. J.: 1969, ‘Logic with the Quantifier ‘There Exist Uncountably Many’’,Ann. Math. Logic1, pp. 1–93.

  Google Scholar 

• Kleene, S. C.: 1952,Introduction to Metamathematics, North-Holland.

• Ladusaw, William: 1979,Polarity Sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.

• Lindstrom, P.: 1966, ‘First-Order Logic and Generalized Quantifiers.’Theoria32, pp. 187–195.

  Google Scholar 

• Milsark, Gary: 1977, ‘Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English.’Linguistic Analysis, Vol.3, No. 1, pp. 1–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Montague, Richard: 1974,Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers. Ed. and with an introduction by Richmond H.Thomason. New Haven. Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Mostowski, A.: 1957. ‘On a Generalization of Quantifiers,’Fund. Math. Vol.44, pp. 12–36.

  Google Scholar 

• Partee, Barbara: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogies Between Tenses and Pronouns in English.’The Journal of Philosophy, Vol.LXX, no. 18, pp. 601–609.

  Google Scholar 

• Peacocke, C.: 1979, ‘Game-Theoretic Semantics, Quantifiers and Truth: Comments on Professor Hintikka's paper,’Game-Theoretical Semantics (ed. by E. Saarinen), Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 119–134.

• Rescher, N.: 1962, ‘Plurality Quantification,’ abstract,J. Symbolic Logic,27, 373–374.

  Google Scholar 

• Sgro, J.: 1977, ‘Completeness Theorems for Topological Models,’Annals Math. Logic, Vol.11, pp. 173–193.

  Google Scholar 

Download references