Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


↓ Skip to main content

ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1When Compilers Are Mirrors
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2Extensibility for the Masses
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3Extensions during Software Evolution: Do Objects Meet Their Promise?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4PQL: A Purely-Declarative Java Extension for Parallel Programming
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5Is It Dangerous to Use Version Control Histories to Study Source Code Evolution?
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6Evaluating the Design of the R Language
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7McSAF: A Static Analysis Framework for MATLAB
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8Multiple Aggregate Entry Points for Ownership Types
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9Inference and Checking of Object Ownership
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10Object Initialization in X10
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11Structured Aliasing
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12Pause ’n’ Play: Formalizing Asynchronous C^\sharp
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13Lightweight Polymorphic Effects
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14Cloud Types for Eventual Consistency
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15Lock Inference in the Presence of Large Libraries
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16An Analysis of the Mozilla Jetpack Extension Framework
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17Smaller Footprint for Java Collections
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18Enhancing JavaScript with Transactions
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19JavaScript as an Embedded DSL
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20Correlation Tracking for Points-To Analysis of JavaScript
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21Soundness of Object-Oriented Languages with Coinductive Big-Step Semantics
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22Static Sessional Dataflow
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23Java Wildcards Meet Definition-Site Variance
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24Constraint-Based Refactoring with Foresight
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25Magda: A New Language for Modularity
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26Marco: Safe, Expressive Macros for Any Language
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27Practical Permissions for Race-Free Parallelism
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28Verification of Snapshot Isolation in Transactional Memory Java Programs
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29Scalable Flow-Sensitive Pointer Analysis for Java with Strong Updates
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30Application-Only Call Graph Construction
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31Program Sliding
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32Static Detection of Loop-Invariant Data Structures
Attention for Chapter 5:Is It Dangerous to Use Version Control Histories to Study Source Code Evolution?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Is It Dangerous to Use Version Control Histories to Study Source Code Evolution?
Chapter number5
Book title
ECOOP 2012 – Object-Oriented Programming
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, June 2012
DOI10.1007/978-3-642-31057-7_5
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-231056-0, 978-3-64-231057-7
Authors

Stas Negara, Mohsen Vakilian, Nicholas Chen, Ralph E. Johnson, Danny Dig, Negara, Stas, Vakilian, Mohsen, Chen, Nicholas, Johnson, Ralph E., Dig, Danny

Editors

James Noble

Timeline

Loginto access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account,click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for86 Mendeley readers of this research output.Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

CountryCountAs %
United States33%
Germany22%
United Kingdom22%
Chile11%
France11%
Canada11%
Unknown7688%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional statusCountAs %
Student > Ph. D. Student2630%
Student > Master2124%
Student > Bachelor89%
Researcher89%
Professor > Associate Professor56%
Other1214%
Unknown67%
Readers by disciplineCountAs %
Computer Science7183%
Engineering22%
Unspecified11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance11%
Social Sciences11%
Other11%
Unknown910%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has anAltmetric Attention Score of3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,446,639
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,535
of 8,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,529
of 173,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#21
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoringhigher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoringhigher than 51% of its contemporaries.

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp