Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Advanced search

Browse Econ Literature

More features

IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jeurec/v22y2024i3p1407-1451..html
    My bibliography Save this article

Trade Disruption, Industrialisation, and the Setting Sun of British Colonial Rule in India

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Bonfatti
  • Björn Brey

Abstract

Colonial trade prompted the colonies to specialise in primary products. Did this eliminate industrialisation opportunities in the colonies, and did it make them more politically dependent on the coloniser? To answer these questions, we examine the impact of the World War I trade shock on industrial growth and support for the anti-colonial movement in India. We find that districts more exposed to a drop in imports experienced faster industrial growth in 1911–1921, thereafter remaining on a higher level of industrial employment. All evidence points to an increase in Indian productivities as the reason for this, suggesting that liberal trade policies may not have been optimal for colonial India. We also find that districts, which industrialised faster thanks to WWI were more likely to support the Indian National Congress. This is consistent with the view that specialisation in primary products made the colonies more politically dependent on the coloniser.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Bonfatti & Björn Brey, 2024."Trade Disruption, Industrialisation, and the Setting Sun of British Colonial Rule in India,"Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1407-1451.
  • Handle:RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:3:p:1407-1451.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvad054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by theCitEc Project, subscribe to itsRSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bo, Shiyu & Chen, Ting & Liu, Cong, 2022."Trade shocks, industrial growth, and electrification in early 20th-century China,"Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 732-749.
    3. Brey, Björn, 2024."The effect of recent technological change on US immigration policy,"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • N65 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle:RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:3:p:1407-1451.. Seegeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do ithere. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by usingthis form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in yourRePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider:https://academic.oup.com/jeea.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is aRePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2026 Movatter.jp