Mark Victor Tushnet (lahir 18 November 1945)[1] mengkhususkan diri dalamhukum dan teori konstitusi, termasuk hukum konstitusi komparatif, dan saat ini adalahProfesor Hukum William Nelson Cromwell diSekolah Hukum Harvard.[2] Tushnet diidentifikasi sebagai salah satu akademisi dalam gerakanstudi hukum kritis.[butuh rujukan]
Tushnet adalah pendukung utama gagasan bahwa pengujian norma harus dibatasi dan bahwa Konstitusi harus dikembalikan "kepada rakyat."[3] Pada tahun 2020, Tushnet menerbitkan sebuah buku yang membahas tentang proses pengujian norma, yang awalnya ia diskusikan dalam bukunya tahun 1999 tentang hal ini.[4]
Pada tahun 1967, Tushnet menerima gelar AB dariHarvard College.[5][6] Dia kemudian melanjutkan studi dan menerima gelar MA dalam sejarah dariUniversitas Yale dan JD dariSekolah Hukum Yale. Tushnet kemudian menjadi pengajar diUniversitas Wisconsin–Madison, dan dia mengajar selama bertahun-tahun di Pusat Hukum Universitas Georgetown.[7][8][9]
Tushnet juga merupakan asisten untukHakim AgungThurgood Marshall di Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat antara tahun 1972 dan 1973.[10] Dalam sidang kongres tahun 1996 tentang vetoPresiden Bill Clinton atas Undang-Undang Larangan Aborsi Sebagian-Kelahiran, Tushnet memberikan keterangan tentang keterlibatannya dalamRoe v.Wade, perkara tahun 1973 yang melanggar undang-undang negara bagian yang melarang aborsi. Selama interogasi, diduga bahwa memorandum yang ditulis oleh Tushnet kepada Marshall memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap hasil kasus tersebut.[11] Baru-baru ini, dia mengomentari kekuatan presiden untuk mengampuni dirinya sendiri, komposisi Pengadilan, dan pensiunnya HakimAnthony Kennedy .[12][13][14] Dia juga dikutip secara luas di media sebagai ahliAmandemen Pertama, hak untuk kebebasan berekspresi dan ruang lingkup kekuasaan presiden.[15][16][17] Pada tahun 2016, Tushnet terdaftar di antara sepuluh profesor hukum yang paling sering dikutip dalam karya ilmiah.[18]
Dia juga dianggap sebagai salah satu tokoh yang kontroversial dalam teori konstitusional, karena ia diidentifikasi dengan gerakan 'studi hukum kritis' dan pernah menyatakan dalam sebuah artikel bahwa, jika ia menjadi hakim dan diminta untuk memutuskan suatu perkara, ia akan berusaha untuk mencapai hasil yang akan "memajukan sosialisme".[19] Tushnet adalah pendukung utama gagasan bahwa pengujian norma harus dibatasi dan bahwa Konstitusi harus dikembalikan "kepada rakyat."[3] Tushnet, bersama Profesor Hukum Harvard,Vicki Jackson, adalah para penulis buku berjudulComparative Constitutional Law (Foundation Press, edisi ke-2 2006).
Tushnet adalah seorang Yahudi. Istrinya, Elizabeth Alexander, adalah seorangUnitarian,[20] dan sebelumnya mengarahkan Proyek Penjara Nasional dariAmerican Civil Liberties Union. Istrinya sekarang bekerja di bidang swasta. Putri merekaRebecca Tushnet juga seorang profesor hukum diHarvard Law School.[21][22] Putri mereka yang lain,Eve, adalah seorang penulis, blogger dan seorangKatolik Roma lesbian yang tidak kawin.[20][23]
- Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law, (Yale U. Press, 2020).
- In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court, (W. W. Norton & Company, 2013)ISBN0393073440.
- I Dissent: Great Opposing Opinions in Landmark Supreme Court Cases, (Malaysia: Beacon Press, pp. 256, 2008)
- Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, (Princeton University Press, 2007).
- A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law (W. W. Norton & Company, 2005)ISBN0393327574
- The New Constitutional Order (Princeton U. Press 2003).
- Slave Law in the American South: State v. Mannin History and Literature (University Press of Kansas 2003).
- The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies (Peter Cane & Mark V. Tushnet eds., Oxford University Press 2003).
- Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law (Vicki C. Jackson & Mark Tushnet eds., Praeger 2002).
- And L. Michael Seidman et al.,Constitutional Law (Little, Brown and Co. 4th ed. 2001).
- Et al.,Federal Courts in the 21st Century: Cases and Materials (LexisNexis 2001).
- Marshall, Thurgood (2001). Tushnet, Mark V., ed.Thurgood Marshall: His Speeches, Writings, Arguments, Opinions and Reminiscences. Kennedy, Randall (Foreword by). Chicago: Chicago Review Press, Incorporated – Lawrence Hill Books.ISBN 9781556523861. Parameter
|name-list-style= yang tidak diketahui akan diabaikan (bantuan) - Making Constitutional Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1961-1991 (Oxford University Press 1997).
- Brown v. Board of Education: The Battle for Integration (Franklin Watts 1995).
- The Warren Court in Historical and Political Perspective (Mark V. Tushnet ed., 1993).
- Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1956–1961 (1994).
- The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950 (1987).
- The American Law of Slavery, 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest (1981).
- And L. Michael Seidman et al.,Constitutional Law (Little, Brown and Co. Supp. 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 2d ed. 1991, Supp. 1992, 1995, 1996, 3d ed. 1996, Supp. 1998, 4th ed. 2001).
- And Vicki C. Jackson,Comparative Constitutional Law (Foundation Press 1999).
- Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts (Princeton University Press 1999), excerpted in Great Cases in Constitutional Law (Robert P. George ed., Princeton University Press, 2000) (reprinting chapter 1 in substance). Symposium of Commentaries on this book: 34 University of Richmond Law Review 359–566 (2000).
- And L. Michael Seidman et al.,Teacher's Manual to The First Amendment (Aspen Law & Business 1999).
- And Francisco Forrest Martin,The Rights International Companion to Constitutional Law: An International Human Rights Law Supplement (Kluwer Law International 1999).
- And L. Michael Seidman,Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues (Oxford University Press 1996).
- Constitutional Issues: The Death Penalty (Facts On File, Inc. 1994).
- Constitutional Law (International Library of Essays in Law & Legal Theory) (Mark V. Tushnet, ed.,New York University Press 1992).
- Comparative Constitutional Federalism: Europe and America (Mark V. Tushnet, ed.,Greenwood Press 1990).
- Central America and the Law: The Constitution, Civil Liberties, and the Courts (South End Press 1988).
- Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law (Harvard University Press 1988).
- Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle over Guns (Oxford University Press 2007).
- ^date & year of birth according to LCNAF Cataloging in Publication
- ^https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10906/Tushnet
- ^abMark Tushnet.Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts (Princeton University Press 1999), pp. 1–11.
- ^Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law, Yale U. Press, 2020.
- ^Karr, Mia C. (28 November 2016)."Law Professor Included on Conservative Nonprofit's 'Watchlist'".Harvard Crimson. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Pazzanes, Christina (27 July 2018)."Are there holes in the Constitution?".Harvard Law Today Magazine. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^"Faculty Notes".The Gargoyle-Alumni Magazine of the University of Wisconsin Law School.9 (1): 4. Autumn 1977. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^"Faculty Bio-Mark Tushnet". Georgetown Law Center. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Leiter, Brian (22 February 2006)."Harvard Makes Offer to Mark Tushnet". Blog: Brian Leiter's Law School Reports. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Mineo, Liz (29 September 2017)."Thurgood Marshall: The soundtrack of their lives Five former clerks of the Supreme Court justice and civil rights champion recall the man who became an icon".Harvard Law Today Magazine. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Origins & Scope of Roe v. Wade: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. DIANE Publishing. 1996. hlm. 119.ISBN 978-0-7881-4919-1.
- ^Mangin, Don; Higgins, Tucker (4 June 2018)."Here's what 12 experts say about whether President Trump can pardon himself".CNBC. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Lemieux, Scott (10 May 2018)."Democrats: Prepare to Pack the Supreme Court".The New Republic. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Miller, Brian (2 July 2018)."The Jurisprudence of Doubt".Forbes. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Whitley, David (23 May 2018)."Commentary: NFL did fans and players a favor with anthem rule".Orlando Sentinel. Diarsipkan dariversi asli tanggal 2018-11-14. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Blake, Aaron (27 January 2018)."Could lying about trying to fire Mueller put Trump in even more hot water?".Washington Post. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Illing, Sean (11 May 2017)."This Harvard law professor thinks Trump really could be impeached over Comey".Vox. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Adler, Jonathan H. (19 May 2016)."Most-cited law faculty, 2010–2014".Washington Post. Volokh Conspiracy Blog. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^"The Dilemmas of Liberal Constitutionalism," 42Ohio State Law Journal 411, 424 (1981).
- ^abOppenheimer, Mark (4 June 2010)."A Gay Catholic Voice Against Same-Sex Marriage".New York Times.
- ^Stohr, Greg (14 November 2017)."Free Speech Is Starting to Dominate the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda".Bloomberg. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^Paulson, Michael; Alter, Alexandra (23 March 2018)."We Asked 7 Lawyers to Untangle the Broadway Fight Over 'To Kill a Mockingbird'".New York Times. Diakses tanggal15 August 2018.
- ^"'Gay and Catholic': An Interview with Author Eve Tushnet". America Magazine. Diakses tanggal21 March 2015.
|
|---|
| Umum | |
|---|
| Perpustakaan nasional | |
|---|
| Basis data ilmiah | |
|---|
| Lain-lain | |
|---|
