PMC Veterans is an elusive, well-equipped and highly combat-effective military formation. Its loyalty to the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Russian state is demonstrated through its distinct image and assault infantry role. Despite being visible to outsiders, the exact details of Veterans’ organisational ties and capabilities remain opaque.
As an organisation, Veterans utilises an array of imagery that venerates the Russian state, the Russian military andVladimir Putin. Identifying the imagery Veterans utilises helps identify it on the battlefield and provides insights into its association with Russian organisations, and combat elements. It also shows how it wishes to present itself to outside observers
PMC Veteran’s motto appears to be ‘We are Russia, Putin is power’ (Мы Россия Путин Сила in Russian). This motto plays into the broader veneration of President Putin and Russia by PMC Veteran. (Source) (Source)
Most symbols utilised by PMC Veteran are not uniquely distinctive from the ones used by traditional Russian elements. PMC Veteran’s social media accounts commonly utilise Russian Orthodox, pro-invasion, pro-Putin and military imagery.
Notably, unlike other volunteer units that try to establish a brand that is distinct from the Russian state and army, Veteran uses symbols to associate itself with both.
The exception to this is the Veterans Putin patch. It is unique to PMC Veterans and is also used as a watermark in some of their pictures and videos. (Source) (Source) (Source) (Source)
Picture of PMC Veterans personnel watermarked with a tactical variant of the semi-state security formation’s patch. (Source)
Examining the patches of a combat unit always provide crucial information about them. In the case of PMC Veterans, they not only help identify their personnel on the battlefield but also indicate ties they have to other organisations. They even help gain potential insights into the ideology of their combatants too.
PMC Veteran personnel sport an array of patches. The patches that distinguish their personnel from any other fighting on the Russian side are distinctive ‘Veterans’ Putin patches, which are also used as watermarks on images posted by their social media accounts.
Based on pictures of their personnel on Telegram, there are numerous tactical and non-tactical versions of this patch. All of them have an image of Putin in their centre, are shield-shaped and include the word ‘Veterans’ but differ in colour.
They can also include additional writing, which either includes PMC Veteran’s motto or the specific units that personnel are assigned to. (Source) (Source) (Source) (Source)
Veteran personnel can also be found with patches which have been obtained through past service in other military branches and PMCs. Equally, they may have never served in them and wear them for aesthetic reasons.
One such example is shown by a picture of a PMC Veterans fighter with the ISIS Hunters patch. ISIS Hunters is a cross-Russian-Syrian semi-state security formation trained, supervised and armed by the Wagner Group. (Source) (Source)
It is not uncommon to see PMC Veterans personnel without the unit’s patches. Various footage of captured Veterans personnel with no Veterans Putin patches on their uniform. This could be for the following reasons:
A zoomed-in picture of various tactical and non-tactical PMC Veterans patches. The tactical patches on the 2nd row include specific unit names in white lettering, just under ‘Veterans’ written in red.(Source)
Veterans have a murky association with the MoD, a political organisation and PMCRedut. Additionally, certain details on its key figures, resources and utilisation of mobilisation personnel are hard to find. That said, existing information does enable some assessments to be made around Veterans as an organisation.
It is possible PMC Veterans is subordinate to the Russian MoD but is not an official unit of it. Some reporting suggests that recruits sign a contract with Veterans through a company connected to the Veterans Of Russia All-Russian Social Movement rather than the MoD.
The website of the Veterans Of Russia All-Russian Social Movement (hereinafter referred to as Veterans of Russia Movement) includes a section on how to join the ‘Veterans Battalion’. (Source)(Source) (Source)
Some footage indicates that Veterans may be a fully-fledged separate airborne assault brigade of the MoD. In a Russian State TV Report, both a commander of Veterans and reporters refer to Veterans as an MoD unit. (Source).
Additionally, a video was filmed in response to an appeal put out by the relatives of mobilised personnel in Veterans. The video features Veterans personnel stating that their unit is a ‘full-fledged brigade of the Ministry of Defence’. (Source)
Other information makes it conceivable that Veterans may also be managed – or even a part of – PMC Redut. Redut may be supported and commanded by key individuals within the Russian Defence Ministry.
Investigative journalists claim that Redut recruits personnel for Veterans. They also suggest Redut is used to pass payments from the Russian Defence Ministry to Veterans.
A Redut detachment called Veterans that has no relation to PMC Veterans at all may also exist. (Source) (Source) (Source)
The difficulty in determining where PMC Veterans is positioned within the Russian military nexus could be by design. Conflicting reports and limited evidence allow Veterans to keep details about its association with the MoD opaque.
Furthermore, it makes it Russian public inquire into its activities within Ukraine and how its personnel are treated.
Given the difficulty of identifying where exactly Veterans is placed within the Russian military nexus, multiple assessments about its financing can be made.
PMC Veterans’ financing would depend on the position it has within the Russian military nexus. If Veterans is subordinate to the MoD but is not an official unit of it, it could be receiving resources from both the Russian state and from commercial entities associated with the Veterans of Russia Movement.
Personnel signing a contract with the official unit would likely be paid through a commercial business associated with the Veterans of Russia movement and even receiving certain equipment from the inventory of the Russian MoD, just as other semi-state security formations do.
If PMC Veterans is related to PMC Redut, it may be financed through Russian state resources and contributions from elites involved in Redut. Since Redut is believed to be controlled by the MoD, it is plausible that under this scenario Veterans could be acquiring funding and equipment from the MoD.
Additionally, institutions connected to PMC Redut could be moving much of that funding from the MoD to Veterans to allow it to cover operating costs such as personnel pay. Elites who are connected to Redut could also be providing contributions in the way of paying for equipment or additional funding too.
Conflicting accounts where Veterans is positioned within the Russian military nexus and the sort of organisations that money needed to sustain the formation is moved through. This makes assessing its financing difficult. This could be done by design to hide the involvement of the Russian MoD from both the Russian public and rival state actors.
Based on conflict reports, it is probable that money and resources that sustain PMC Veterans are moved through commercial entities connected to PMC Redut, the ‘All-Russian Public Movement Veterans of Russia’ or public institutions like the Russian MoD.
The difficulty of finding information on Veterans’ connections to any commercial entities connected to PMC Redut, the MoD or the ‘All-Russian Public Movement Veterans of Russia’ makes it challenging to assess its business structure.
An examination of who the key figures in PMC Veterans are provides important details on their commanders, such as their experience and skills. Additionally, their association with other Russian combat units can identify the relationship between Veterans and other organisations.
Little details can be found about Commander Dmitri with the Callsign ‘Mouse’ (Мышa), not even his second name. Information from a documentary on ‘Stormtroopers’ released by Russian state TV outlet ‘First Channel’ (Первый Канал) indicates that Dmitri has a senior command role within Veterans. (Source)
Given clips from this documentary and other sources showing Dmitri in combat, it appears he acts as a sort of field commander who fights alongside other Veterans personnel. (Source)
How Dmitri earned his Callsign ‘Mouse’ is also explained within the documentary. Supposedly, Dmitri earned a reputation from moving in and out of positions on the battlefield like a ‘mouse’ during his involvement in combat operations within the lower-intensity invasion of the Donbas since 2014.
This, alongside other information provided in the documentary, could indicate that Dmitri has experience working within assault brigades or diversionary reconnaissance groups, which would explain why he leads Veterans as an assault unit on the ground.
A post made on the news section of the All-Russian Public Movement Veterans of Russia may be the only piece of evidence that indicates Aleksandr’s full name and birthday. According to it, Aleksandr’s birthday is April 16th, though the year he was born could not be found.
The post could so be the only available information to indicate that ‘Marine’ might have the full name of Aleksandr Nikolayevich. A lack of supporting evidence of this makes it possible that Nikolayevich could also be his middle name or not his real surname at all. (Source)
Aleksandar ‘Marine’ Nikolayevich appears to be the highest-ranking commander within Veterans that can be identified based on existing information. In an interview with Aleksandr, he claims to be one of the commanders central to the formation of units that were established to fight against Ukrainian forces within the Donbas in 2014.
He also claims to have worked with commanders such as the infamous Arsen ‘Motorola’ Pavlov (who died in 2016) as part of this effort post-2014. (Source) (Source) (Source)
Aleksandr was likely involved in a broader strategy by the aforementioned commanders to create formations which would participate in the widened invasion of Ukraine. Aleksandar has claimed that Veterans is the first of five companies that were formed in tandem with these commanders who led units in the Donbas since 2014, with the others being the following:
Eduard ‘Count’ Baitsaev was likely a deputy commander within Veterans, though information about his combat experience and role within the formation is limited. Some information appears to indicate that Eduard was from North Ossetia, which is something he also claimed numerous times in a Russian state TV report.
Eduard was likely killed in action during May of this year whilst fighting against Ukrainian forces in Vuhledar orAvdiivka. (Source) (Source) (Source)
PMC Veterans relies on social media and a website page for it to recruit new personnel into its ranks. Veterans use two accounts with the same name on Telegram proactively to draw attention to the unit and increase interest in prospective recruits to join.
Veterans has also benefited from the favourable coverage it has received from Russian state TV, which has aided in its representation of the unit as a motivated, well-equipped and assault-capable formation. (Source) (Source) (Source) (Source)
Based on a poster uploaded to one of Veteran’s Telegram channels and other open sources, it appears the sort of personnel that Veterans most want within their ranks are those with military experience:
Whilst those with military experience are preferred by Veterans, it does not appear to be essential to have any military experience when joining as a recruit. The following are essential though:
The terms of a contract with Veterans are also made clear. Contracts can be signed for either 6 months or 12 months of service. Payment starts from roughly 230,000 rubles a month (Roughly £2150 a month) with that going up depending on experience, combat performance and rank.
There is no evidence to indicate whether actual pay matches this stated figure or not.
Other benefits attached to a contract involve:
Recruits in personnel are promised at least two weeks of training. More than two weeks of training is promised by Veterans to personnel who are not deemed to be combat-ready by instructors. Foundational training or additional training is promised for recruits in the following areas:
PMC Veterans has possibly engaged in the coercive recruitment of Russian mobilised personnel. Some evidence points to the fact that Veterans has bought mobilised personnel from local authorities and coerced them into fighting on the frontline.
It is reported to have done this by taking away the documents, taking away telephones, threatening to revoke the vacation rights of personnel and forcibly transferring them to the frontline. Some individuals appear to have been bought for 25,000 rubles per head. (Source) (Source)
Veterans may also be using mobilised personnel as first-echelon assault troops and making them follow attacking orders through the threat of violence. It is plausible that Veterans forced mobilised personnel to conduct unsupported assaults against Ukrainian positions with the threat of knee-capping and other acts of violence.
Reporting has highlighted one incident in May 2023 where mobilised personnel were made to conduct an assault against Ukrainian tanks in Bakhmut without any artillery support, military communications or any other weaponry than assault rifles. (Source) (Source)
The equipment utilised by Veterans personnel appears to vary depending on their experience, rank, status (mobilised or volunteer) and specialism within the formation. Whilst accounting for how Veterans may try to over-represent or under-represent how well-armed it is, some insights into the equipment their personnel utilise on the battlefield can be made using open sources.
PMC Veterans combatant deploying a DJI Mavic 3 civilian UAV. (Source)
Sparse tactical-operational information about PMC Veterans and their involvement in the invasion of Ukraine exists. A comprehensive assessment of openly available information can provide some insight into how Veterans operates on the battlefield.
A few of PMC Veterans’ areas of operations can be identified based on existing information. They include the following:
PMC Veterans has an array of purposes. Veterans generates manpower for the widened Russian invasion by coercively enlisting mobilised individuals and recruiting motivated volunteers through enticing contracts.
This enables the formation to balance the creation of motivated assault infantry elements with swiftly generating disposable manpower to meet Russian operational demand in its invasion of Ukraine.
Veterans also aids the Russian state in the recruitment of military specialists who bolster Russian invasion force capabilities. Veterans’ recruitment drive for specialists through repeated calls for the enlistment of specialists and the offer of higher pay in contract to them is indicative of this.
By taking these steps, Veterans increases the amount of UAV operators, sappers, artillery specialists and other specialists that are at the disposal of the Russian military leadership.
Veterans combatants uses various tactics, many of which are not unique to its as a combat unit when compared to other Russian units.
One of the tactics that PMC Veterans appears to utilise is the deployment of UAVs in an intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance (ISTAR) capacity whilst using automatic grenade launchers, mortars and artillery systems.
Footage shows that some of these drones are fitted with thermal optics which allow Veterans personnel to engage in stand-off strikes and the correction of those strikes against Ukrainian personnel at night (Source) (Source) (Source).
PMC Veterans may also be using coercively mobilised personnel to conduct assault operations against Ukrainian forces to soften them up before more elite Veterans personnel engage them.
Reporting on the use of mobilised personnel being made to conduct unsupported assaults against Ukrainian forces by Veterans personnel indicates a potential use of disposable manpower being employed to mitigate the loss of more elite detachments when they conduct attacks themselves.
A similar tactic has been employed by the Wagner Group in Ukraine. (Source)
A confidential source has provided some additional insights into Veterans’ combat effectiveness. The source described Veterans personnel as far better equipped than most Russian personnel within Ukraine, possessing weaponry, optics and kit that stood out in their quality.
They also noted that their training appeared to be superior to those of regular Russian army units and that their performance on the battlefield indicated a significant combat experience. This included an ability to efficiently operate and coordinate with other Russian units.
Reliable information regarding Veterans’ personnel size is sparse. Some estimates put the size of the group at around 2000 personnel. However, it is hard to know whether this figure accounts for coercively mobilised personnel like the 501 of whom were reported to have been transferred to the so-called Lugansk People’s Republic territory in late May of this year.
An absence of detailed figures on Veterans’ manpower may be indicative of the effective utilisation of informational security and operational security by it. (Source)
Difficulties in obtaining detailed information on Veterans’ tactics, organisational structure, capabilities and operations despite its high social media visibility show its robust operational and informational security. This adherence to operational and informational security is shown in the following ways:
PMC Veterans’ future is contingent on developments within Russia and Ukraine soon. In the event of a successful Ukrainian counter-offensive operation Veterans may experience losses that will degrade its ability to continually perform its core role as an assault unit.
Alteratively, If such an operation fails for Ukraine, PMC Veterans personnel may continue operating in existing areas of operations in a renewed offensive capacity.
Veterans may also lose military resources, financial resources and access to manpower from the Russian MoD and other critical stakeholders if instability within Russia reaches significant levels.
PMC Veterans can be identified as a well-equipped, well-resourced formation managed by capable leadership that shows proficiency in maintaining operational and information security. Nonetheless, a lack of available information does constrain the extent of analysis which can be made around how Veterans conducts operations in Ukraine.
Veterans serves as an illustration of the opaqueness of self-described volunteer units when it comes to their support from the Russian state and other key stakeholders. Identifying its features on an organisation and tactical-operational level may be instrumental in assessing the impact of Veterans on the frontline.
Weapons IDing support by@WarNoir
Related Content
Grey Dynamics is an Intelligence firm based out of London with a network of analysts, researchers, and investigators worldwide.
Log in
"*" indicates required fields