Binaries are not compatible with Alpine since it is using a different libc. You can compile your own binaries if you insist on using this particular embedded dist.

View full answer

Replies: 5 comments 5 replies

Comment options

dalisoft
Jun 5, 2019
Author

I will track this issuehere and will add solution on README

You must be logged in to vote

0 replies

Comment options

ghost
Dec 21, 2020

Binaries are not compatible with Alpine since it is using a different libc. You can compile your own binaries if you insist on using this particular embedded dist.

You must be logged in to vote

1 reply

Comment options

dalisoft Dec 21, 2020
Author

Sorry@alexhultman, you here wrong, binaries supports Alpine and even CentOS, see my answer below and if you think my answer helpful, you can mark as Answer.

Answer selected

Comment options

dalisoft
Dec 21, 2020
Author

If anyone also gets this issue, you can try

RUN ln -s /lib/libc.musl-x86_64.so.1 /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 command.
It worked for me.
uWebSockets.js is amazing, even binaries works with this command.

If you need solutions for Docker/Linux issues, look athere as my library works on top of uWebSockets.js

You must be logged in to vote

2 replies

Comment options

theoephraim Nov 20, 2024

same solution but for multiple architectures
RUN ln -s "/lib/libc.musl-$(uname -m).so.1" "/lib/ld-linux-$(uname -m).so.1"

Comment options

kolserdav Apr 25, 2025

uname -m in Dockerfile always shows$BUILDPLATFORM not$TARGETPLATFORM

Comment options

kroscek
May 28, 2021

I can run uwebsocket.js inside Docker with additional: RUN apk add --no-cache gcompat

You must be logged in to vote

1 reply

Comment options

kodmanyagha Dec 5, 2023

Bro, you saved my 3 days. I want to write a poetry for this answer.

Sometimes I feel that my brain is going to blow.
Searching engines and scrolling to below.
Neither google nor chatgpt nor stackoverflow,
Thanks to all github bros who opens window.