Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [explicit-member-accessibility] refine report locations#8869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
fix(eslint-plugin): [explicit-member-accessibility] refine report locations#8869
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@kirkwaiblinger! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedApr 7, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedApr 7, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
suggestions: [ | ||
{ | ||
messageId: 'addExplicitAccessibility', | ||
data: { type: 'public' }, | ||
output: ` | ||
class Test { | ||
public constructor(public...x: any[]) {} | ||
public constructor(public x: any[]) {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
changed this since it's illegal syntax for a parameter property to be a rest element. Though the rule doesn't really care.
kirkwaiblingerApr 7, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
i audited everyinvalid
test case and put in the exact report range, since it wasvery helpful for development to do so. I realize, however, that that may be overkill for testing (and can make modifications to the rule or test cases unnecessarily unwieldy). If requested, I can remove some of the added report locations. But IMO they might as well stay now that they're there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Eventually we'll have#6994 and we can kill all of the line/col assertions.
@kirkwaiblinger If you don't want to auto-close that issue, you have to make sure your description doesn't contain the substring "fixes #xxx". You can say "fixes (partially) #xxx" (I usually do that) |
Confused by the CI failure, looking for advice on how to resolve it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
c9a8386
intotypescript-eslint:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
cc@developer-bandi
Overview
This PR makes it so that formissing accessibility modifiers, we report just the symbol name preceeded by however many keywords (
get
,abstract
, etc)and for
public
modifiers that shouldnot be present, weonly flag on thepublic
keyword itself