Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] combine template literal check withconst variable check#8820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Conversation

abrahamguo
Copy link
Contributor

@abrahamguoabrahamguo commentedApr 2, 2024
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

In#8740, new logic was added for template literals. This logic was wrongly added as a precondition, when it needs to be combined with the existingconst variable declaration logic.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@abrahamguo!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlifyNetlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedApr 2, 2024
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commitd8f2fe7
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/660b661027b6d80008511550
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-8820--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 92 (🟢 up 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration.

@nx-cloudNx Cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedApr 2, 2024
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commitd8f2fe7. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 31 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

@abrahamguoabrahamguo marked this pull request as draftApril 2, 2024 01:29
@abrahamguoabrahamguo marked this pull request as ready for reviewApril 2, 2024 01:34
@codecovCodecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedApr 2, 2024
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.37%. Comparing base(a14ba9d) to head(d8f2fe7).
Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@##             main    #8820      +/-   ##==========================================- Coverage   88.02%   87.37%   -0.65%==========================================  Files         405      255     -150       Lines       14089    12510    -1579       Branches     4125     3927     -198     ==========================================- Hits        12402    10931    -1471+ Misses       1382     1304      -78+ Partials      305      275      -30
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest87.37% <100.00%> (-0.65%)⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

FilesCoverage Δ
...-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.ts97.53% <100.00%> (-0.04%)⬇️

... and150 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Leaving in1 approval in case anyone else has time to review.

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge labelMay 26, 2024
@bradzacherbradzacher merged commit0d2e7ea intotypescript-eslint:mainMay 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsJun 10, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1 approval>=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] (regression) false positives on template literals with no expressions
3 participants
@abrahamguo@JoshuaKGoldberg@bradzacher

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp