Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] combine template literal check withconst
variable check#8820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@abrahamguo! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedApr 2, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedApr 2, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
codecovbot commentedApr 2, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #8820 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 88.02% 87.37% -0.65%========================================== Files 405 255 -150 Lines 14089 12510 -1579 Branches 4125 3927 -198 ==========================================- Hits 12402 10931 -1471+ Misses 1382 1304 -78+ Partials 305 275 -30
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
LGTM, thanks! Leaving in1 approval
in case anyone else has time to review.
0d2e7ea
intotypescript-eslint:mainUh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
Overview
In#8740, new logic was added for template literals. This logic was wrongly added as a precondition, when it needs to be combined with the existing
const
variable declaration logic.valid
tests added infix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] avoid remove const casting on template literals with expressions inside #8740 are actually unnecessary (but are too complex to be detected by the current logic). Changedconst
tolet
, so that the type assertions are truly necessary.isLiteralVariableDeclarationChangingTypeWithConst
toisImplicitlyNarrowedConstDeclaration
.