Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
feat(eslint-plugin-internal): add internal lint rule no-relative-paths-to-internal-packages#8596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@kirkwaiblinger! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedMar 5, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedMar 5, 2024 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
| import { createRule } from '../util'; | ||
| export const REPO_ROOT = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../../..'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
tried to import this from/packages/repo-tools/src/paths.mts but ts was upset about some module stuff that I didn't really understand.
088d69b toe73995dCompareCodecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #8596 +/- ##==========================================+ Coverage 87.12% 87.14% +0.01%========================================== Files 251 252 +1 Lines 12268 12287 +19 Branches 3868 3871 +3 ==========================================+ Hits 10689 10708 +19 Misses 1307 1307 Partials 272 272
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
kirkwaiblinger commentedMar 5, 2024
Not sure about the CI failure, but it appears to be failing on other recent PRs as well |
JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
JoshuaKGoldberg commentedMar 18, 2024
Yeah, the integration tests are unrelated. This is great - thanks! |


PR Checklist
Overview
Adds internal lint rule to look for flag relative imports that import code from other packages.
Found no existing violations! :)