Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
feat(eslint-plugin): [no-array-delete] add new rule#8067
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
feat(eslint-plugin): [no-array-delete] add new rule#8067
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@StyleShit! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedDec 14, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Getting there! A blocking request on thefix
/suggestion
difference. And some more testing I thought of just now. Thanks!~
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
not sure why the CI is failing. doesn't seem to be related to this PR 🤷 |
Yeah the CI failures are fixed on |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Progress!
if (node.argument.type !== AST_NODE_TYPES.MemberExpression) { | ||
return null; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
[Cleanup] I can see why this code helps -node.argument
loses its type refinement (narrowing) inside this closure. But it's a duplicate statement that shouldn't be necessary.
I think a cleaner approach would be to storenode.argument
in a variable. Then we wouldn't have to worry about its type being misunderstood by TypeScript later on.
const{ argument}=node;if(argument.type!==AST_NODE_TYPES.MemberExpression){return;}
if(node.argument.type!==AST_NODE_TYPES.MemberExpression){ | |
returnnull; | |
} |
Aside: I haven't looked deeply intomicrosoft/TypeScript#56908 to see whether it would apply to a property of a parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I actually tried it and it didn't work for some reason. now it works 😅
TS is afraid of you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Closes#4432