Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
feat: require-array-sort-compare + toSorted#8052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@Zamiell! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedDec 12, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
return { | ||
"CallExpression[arguments.length=0] > MemberExpression[property.name='sort'][computed=false]": | ||
checkSortArgument, | ||
"CallExpression[arguments.length=0] > MemberExpression[property.name='toSorted'][computed=false]": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
[Non-Actionable] Aside: I'm glad you didn't increase the complexity of this selector 😂 I think it's at the maximum reasonable level to still be readable as-is...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
lol, that was because i simply do not know the selector syntax well enough to even try
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Love it, super straightforward and clean. Thanks! ✨
CI failures are unrelated. |
SHOOT meant to rename the PR to |
@Zamiell@JoshuaKGoldberg There's a test failure with this PR because the doc description wasn't updated. One of you want to follow-up? |
can you direct me to the file (or preferably, the line) that you want me to update? |
Josh-Cena commentedDec 13, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This isthe error: Summary of all failing tests FAIL tests/docs.test.ts (195 MB heap size) ● Validating rule docs › require-array-sort-compare.md › require-array-sort-compare.md must start with frontmatter description expect(received).toMatchObject(expected) - Expected - 1 + Received + 1 Object { "depth": 2, - "text": "description: 'Require `Array#sort` and `Array#toSorted` calls to always provide a `compareFunction`.'", + "text": "description: 'Require `Array#sort` calls to always provide a `compareFunction`.'", "type": "heading", } So, you would edit the |
Huh, brain fart on my end missing this. Thanks for the catch! |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
Overview
A simple PR that just expands the rule to check for both
sort
andtoSorted
(instead of just checking forsort
).For context, when the rule was originally created,
toSorted
didn't exist, as this is a new array method.