Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
chore(typescript-estree): fixed no-unnecessary-condition complaints#7835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Thanks for the PR,@JoshuaKGoldberg! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedOct 25, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site configuration. |
nx-cloudbot commentedOct 25, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
@@ -25,8 +25,7 @@ let warnedAboutTSVersion = false; | |||
export function warnAboutTSVersion(parseSettings: ParseSettings): void { | |||
if (!isRunningSupportedTypeScriptVersion && !warnedAboutTSVersion) { | |||
const isTTY = | |||
typeof process === 'undefined' ? false : process.stdout?.isTTY; | |||
const isTTY = typeof process === 'undefined' ? false : process.stdout.isTTY; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
IIRC this is actually necessary
#1619
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
🤔 I don't like adding support for something that's not possible per type definitions...process.stdout
is supposed to exist. If some bundler removes it then they're telling a lie to packages like us. Hmm.#7896
bradzacherNov 12, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
Yeah generally I'd say "I don't care" if someone's playing funny-buggers like that -- but the reason we accepted it was because it's prettier and they're one of our biggest consumers and we ❤️ them
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
I do ❤️ Prettier 😄
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
Overview
Makes progress on fixing existing
@typescript-eslint/no-unnecessary-condition
violations underpackages/typescript-estree
. Part of a series of PRs that split this up, as there are many of them.