Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork2.8k
fix: correct handling of additionalProperties in object schemas#6939
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Adam Jones <domdomegg+git@gmail.com>
Thanks for the PR,@bradzacher! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
netlifybot commentedApr 20, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
✅ Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site settings. |
nx-cloudbot commentedApr 20, 2023 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## v6 #6939 +/- ##==========================================- Coverage 87.51% 87.50% -0.01%========================================== Files 376 376 Lines 12944 12936 -8 Branches 3821 3820 -1 ==========================================- Hits 11328 11320 -8 Misses 1231 1231 Partials 385 385
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.
good catch 👍
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
PR Checklist
Overview
@domdomegg's#6894 made me realise I'd incorrectly handled this case in the schema gen.
When it's missing/
undefined
it's the same as beingtrue
- but I treated it asfalse