Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-import-type-side-effects] correctly ignore zero-specifier imports#6444

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Merged
bradzacher merged 1 commit intomainfrom6431-jfc-im-an-idoit
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

bradzacher
Copy link
Member

@bradzacherbradzacher commentedFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

PR Checklist

Overview

@bradzacherbradzacher added the bugSomething isn't working labelFeb 9, 2023
@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR,@bradzacher!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently onhttps://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloudbot commentedFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commitf0dc4a6. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 47 targets

Sent with 💌 fromNxCloud.

@netlify
Copy link

netlifybot commentedFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview fortypescript-eslint ready!

NameLink
🔨 Latest commitf0dc4a6
🔍 Latest deploy loghttps://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/63e4cfe83b29fa000828508f
😎 Deploy Previewhttps://deploy-preview-6444--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to yourNetlify site settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecovbot commentedFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging#6444 (f0dc4a6) intomain (a9cb860) willincrease coverage by0.00%.
The diff coverage is100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@##             main    #6444   +/-   ##=======================================  Coverage   91.53%   91.53%           =======================================  Files         371      371             Lines       12662    12664    +2       Branches     3721     3722    +1     =======================================+ Hits        11590    11592    +2  Misses        754      754             Partials      318      318
FlagCoverage Δ
unittest91.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown.Click here to find out more.

Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
...nt-plugin/src/rules/no-import-type-side-effects.ts100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀

Comment on lines 29 to +34
'ImportDeclaration[importKind!="type"]'(
node: TSESTree.ImportDeclaration,
): void {
if (node.specifiers.length === 0) {
return;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Per our recent conversation somewhere, if you wanted to, ESQuery can reduce this code count a bit 😄

Suggested change
'ImportDeclaration[importKind!="type"]'(
node:TSESTree.ImportDeclaration,
):void{
if(node.specifiers.length===0){
return;
}
'ImportDeclaration[importKind!="type"][specifiers.0]'(
node:TSESTree.ImportDeclaration,
):void{

bradzacher reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link
MemberAuthor

@bradzacherbradzacherFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

back in the day I was all in on esquery selectors. I thought it was great to dump everything into a selector and keep the code logic about processing the node.

now a days though I tend to feel that leaning too heavily into the custom DSL makes code less accessible and harder to understand / debug.
[specifiers.0] is one of those parts of the DSL that's super unclear as to what it's doing, IMO.

I think leveraging super clear parts of the DSL (prop existence, parents) are great and easy to understand, but for anything more complex it's better to write the clearer logic.


also as an interesting aside just because...
I figured out that selectors actually hide performance cost of rules! ESLint only tracks (1) time spent increate and (2) time spent in selector functions for a rule.

so time spent compiling and evaluation selector strings is perf cost in ESLint land - not for the rule.

Which is funny for rules like those ineslint-plugin-unicorn which heavily (ab)use selectors over logic, because they'll look like they're faster than other rules!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Ooh I wonder if we should have a lint rule for selectors. And maybe put it ineslint-plugin-eslint-plugin...

Copy link
MemberAuthor

@bradzacherbradzacherFeb 9, 2023
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Separately I've also envisioned a lint rule that enforces the type annotation on the function arg matches the selector to improve safety.

EG

// bad'ImportDeclaration[importKind != "type"]'(node: TSESTree.Literal)'BlockStatement > *'(node: TSESTree.Literal)// good'ImportDeclaration[importKind != "type"]'(node: TSESTree.ImportDeclaration)'ImportDeclaration[importKind != "type"]'(node: TSESTree.ImportDeclaration & {importKind: 'type'})'BlockStatement > *'(node: TSESTree.Node)

but such a rule would be unnecessary if we build template literal types... hmmmm

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

@bradzacherbradzacher merged commitd5a6688 intomainFeb 9, 2023
@bradzacherbradzacher deleted the 6431-jfc-im-an-idoit branchFebruary 9, 2023 22:42
crapStone pushed a commit to Calciumdibromid/CaBr2 that referenced this pull requestFeb 14, 2023
This PR contains the following updates:| Package | Type | Update | Change ||---|---|---|---|| [@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.51.0` -> `5.52.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2feslint-plugin/5.51.0/5.52.0) || [@typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint) | devDependencies | minor | [`5.51.0` -> `5.52.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/@typescript-eslint%2fparser/5.51.0/5.52.0) |---### Release Notes<details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)</summary>### [`v5.52.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5520-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5510v5520-2023-02-13)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.51.0...v5.52.0)##### Bug Fixes-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-import-type-side-effects] correctly ignore zero-specifier imports ([#&#8203;6444](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6444)) ([d5a6688](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d5a6688))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] account for optional chaining on potentially void values ([#&#8203;6432](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6432)) ([e1d9c67](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@e1d9c67)), closes [#&#8203;5255](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#5255)-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] fix false positive when checking indexed access types ([#&#8203;6452](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6452)) ([d569924](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@d569924))-   **eslint-plugin:** fix key-spacing when type starts on next line ([#&#8203;6412](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6412)) ([3eb2eed](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@3eb2eed))##### Features-   **eslint-plugin:** \[block-spacing] extending base rule for TS related blocks ([#&#8203;6195](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6195)) ([b2db3f5](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@b2db3f5))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[explicit-function-return-type] add allowFunctionsWithoutTypeParameters option ([#&#8203;6105](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6105)) ([113640e](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@113640e))-   **eslint-plugin:** \[explicit-function-return-type] add allowIIFEs option ([#&#8203;6237](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6237)) ([a1b3f7b](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@a1b3f7b))</details><details><summary>typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser)</summary>### [`v5.52.0`](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;5520-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5510v5520-2023-02-13)[Compare Source](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint@v5.51.0...v5.52.0)**Note:** Version bump only for package [@&#8203;typescript-eslint/parser](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/parser)</details>---### Configuration📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.--- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box---This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xMzMuMCIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjEzNi4wIn0=-->Co-authored-by: cabr2-bot <cabr2.help@gmail.com>Reviewed-on:https://codeberg.org/Calciumdibromid/CaBr2/pulls/1784Reviewed-by: Epsilon_02 <epsilon_02@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-authored-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>Co-committed-by: Calciumdibromid Bot <cabr2_bot@noreply.codeberg.org>
@github-actionsgithub-actionsbot locked asresolvedand limited conversation to collaboratorsFeb 18, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in.
Reviewers

@JoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldbergJoshuaKGoldberg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bugSomething isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-import-type-side-effects] doesn't allow side effects only imports
2 participants
@bradzacher@JoshuaKGoldberg

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp